From kuijken at strw.leidenuniv.nl  Wed Aug  5 20:34:39 2015
From: kuijken at strw.leidenuniv.nl (Konrad Kuijken)
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:34:39 +0200
Subject: [Comm2011] Fwd: PPRS-044520-Closed-VST-OPTICS & SUPPORT-IQ
	degradation on VST/OmegaCAM - !!! MASTER TICKET !!!-Electronic
Message-ID: <8654610B-1D81-4DCE-ADB8-CE74C4155CD5@strw.leidenuniv.nl>



Begin forwarded message:

> From: Paranal_AREmail <esoarspl at eso.org>
> Subject: PPRS-044520-Closed-VST-OPTICS & SUPPORT-IQ degradation on VST/OmegaCAM - !!! MASTER TICKET !!!-Electronic
> Date: August 4, 2015 1:05:43 CEST
> To: kuijken at strw.leidenuniv.nl
> Reply-To: Paranal_AREmail <esoarspl at eso.org>
> 
> Ticket PPRS-044520 in the Paranal PRS has now been closed.
> A description of the problem, including its resolution, is listed below.
> 
> 
> Problem Number ?: PPRS-044520
> 
> Creation Date ??: 03/26/12 08:25:24 ?by Carlos La Fuente ?(clafuent at eso.org)
> Type ???????????: Problem
> Keywords ???????: IQ degradation on VST/OmegaCAM - !!! MASTER TICKET !!!
> Priority ???????: Critical
> Deadline ???????: 
> Status ?????????: Closed
> 
> ----- ?Minor Change Section ---------------------
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> 
> Location ????????????: VST
> Area/Instrument Type : TELESCOPE
> System/Instrument ???: OPTICS & SUPPORT
> Sub-system ??????????: 
> 
> Assigned to Group ???: Electronic
> Assigned to Person ??: rhuerta
> CC List ?????????????:
> steam at eso.org
> Vst_Omega_Notification 
> uweilenm at eso.org 
> msterzik at eso.org 
> vst at eso.org
> par-vst at eso.org 
> acarlier at eso.org 
> akaufer at eso.org
> pietro.schipani at oacn.inaf.it
> tszeifer at eso.org
> gvaldes at eso.org
> par-tios at eso.org 
> par-optics at eso.org
> kuijken at strw.leidenuniv.nl
> 
> jspyromi at eso.orgVst_all 
> mboccas at eso.org 
> aleiva at eso.org
> 
> Telescope Downtime ??: 15:00
> Workload (hrs.) ?????: 27
> Detailed Description :
> Hi, 
> Since 2012-03-22 night the IQ degradation has become more recurring.
> It happends in a random way and in many different positions.
> With or without guiding and/or with or without doing active optics.
> 
> As far as I know, the only thing that changed duirng this week is that guideprobe was enable on March 22th 2012. 
> 
> The following are some examples of 2 different OBs
> 
> 
> This was without guiding and AO loop was closed only in OB 639814 and 639838 
> ================================================================================================================================================================
> 2012-03-26T05:14:57 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78",14 ?0.82",14 ?0.77",16 ?0.91",10 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ?????3.2 ??- ???14.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:16:24 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????0.65", 4 ?0.63", 6 ?0.55", 4 ?0.86",13 ????1 ???0.73" 0.77" ??39.8 21.5 ???9.0 11.6 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.77 ?21.5 ?11.6 ?OT=0.80
> 2012-03-26T05:23:45 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????0.69", 6 ?0.63",13 ?0.67",15 ?1.03",16 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????30.2 ??- ???13.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:25:15 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????0.52", 9 ?0.51", 7 ?0.48", 3 ?1.02",16 ????1 ???0.70" 0.73" ??58.8 44.5 ???9.5 11.3 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?33.0 ?11.4 ?OT=0.76
> 2012-03-26T05:27:21 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 5 ?0.63",10 ?0.61",10 ?0.93",15 ????0 ???0.71" ?-- ????23.5 ??- ????9.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:28:46 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.77", 6 ?0.62",10 ?0.58",12 ?0.96",14 ????0 ???0.74" 0.72" ??39.6 31.6 ??10.7 10.1 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?32.5 ?11.0 ?OT=0.75
> 2012-03-26T05:30:46 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84",10 ?0.80",14 ?0.74",17 ?0.81",14 ????1 ???0.79" ?-- ?????3.8 ??- ???13.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> 2012-03-26T05:32:12 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.76", 8 ?0.68",16 ?0.66",12 ?0.93",17 ????0 ???0.75" 0.77" ??18.9 11.3 ??12.4 12.9 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?27.2 ?11.5 ?OT=0.80
> 2012-03-26T05:34:15 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.71", 6 ?0.61", 9 ?0.62", 7 ?1.07",20 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ????33.4 ??- ????9.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:35:44 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.66", 6 ?0.58",10 ?0.58", 6 ?0.99",20 ????0 ???0.71" 0.72" ??35.7 34.5 ???9.9 ?9.7 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?28.7 ?11.1 ?OT=0.75
> 2012-03-26T05:37:47 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????0.71", 6 ?0.61",11 ?0.56", 9 ?0.77",14 ????0 ???0.69" ?-- ????29.9 ??- ???10.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:39:15 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????0.68", 4 ?0.57", 8 ?0.57", 6 ?1.00",22 ????1 ???0.71" 0.70" ??40.2 35.1 ???9.5 10.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?29.7 ?10.9 ?OT=0.73
> 2012-03-26T05:41:21 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 8 ?0.70",14 ?0.65", 9 ?0.92",19 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ????18.5 ??- ???11.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:42:49 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.70",11 ?0.63", 8 ?0.80",13 ????0 ???0.72" 0.73" ??18.7 18.6 ??10.1 10.8 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?28.2 ?10.9 ?OT=0.76
> 2012-03-26T05:44:52 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 6 ?0.56", 9 ?0.56", 8 ?0.88",16 ????0 ???0.66" ?-- ????34.3 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:46:21 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.63", 6 ?0.53",10 ?0.51", 7 ?0.90",20 ????1 ???0.65" 0.66" ??40.0 37.2 ???9.5 ?9.6 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.73 ?29.3 ?10.7 ?OT=0.68
> 2012-03-26T05:52:44 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73",14 ?0.74",17 ?0.60",11 ?0.68", 9 ????0 ???0.71" ?-- ????14.2 ??- ???13.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:54:13 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????0.59", 5 ?0.51", 7 ?0.47", 6 ?0.92",18 ????1 ???0.65" 0.68" ??50.5 32.4 ???9.3 11.2 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?29.6 ?10.8 ?OT=0.70
> 2012-03-26T05:56:23 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 7 ?0.65",12 ?0.56", 6 ?0.82",12 ????0 ???0.70" ?-- ????23.8 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:57:53 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 8 ?0.66",13 ?0.59", 8 ?0.82",11 ????0 ???0.70" 0.70" ??23.1 23.4 ??10.5 10.1 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?29.0 ?10.7 ?OT=0.73
> 2012-03-26T05:59:55 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 4 ?0.54", 8 ?0.51", 6 ?0.86",16 ????0 ???0.66" ?-- ????39.5 ??- ????8.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:01:20 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????0.65", 4 ?0.55", 8 ?0.50", 8 ?0.92",15 ????1 ???0.68" 0.67" ??45.1 42.3 ???9.4 ?9.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?30.2 ?10.6 ?OT=0.69
> 2012-03-26T06:03:28 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????0.62", 9 ?0.64",10 ?0.60", 9 ?0.89",10 ????0 ???0.70" ?-- ????26.1 ??- ???10.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:04:54 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????0.63", 6 ?0.58",10 ?0.56", 7 ?0.91",14 ????0 ???0.69" 0.69" ??32.6 29.3 ???9.4 ?9.7 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?30.1 ?10.5 ?OT=0.72
> 2012-03-26T06:07:02 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75",13 ?0.74",14 ?0.72",12 ?0.76",10 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ?????2.2 ??- ???12.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:08:31 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????0.90",16 ?0.90",14 ?0.81",13 ?0.78", 6 ????0 ???0.84" 0.79" ???1.8 ?2.0 ??13.5 12.8 ?????????A ?A ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?28.0 ?10.7 ?OT=0.82
> 2012-03-26T06:10:39 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????0.76",11 ?0.78",16 ?0.70",10 ?0.80", 9 ????1 ???0.76" ?-- ?????6.9 ??- ???12.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> 2012-03-26T06:12:05 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????0.74", 3 ?0.64", 7 ?0.59", 5 ?0.87",12 ????0 ???0.72" 0.74" ??27.6 17.3 ???7.8 10.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.2 ?10.6 ?OT=0.77
> 2012-03-26T06:14:13 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78",12 ?0.72",14 ?0.60",10 ?0.83",12 ????0 ???0.73" ?-- ????20.3 ??- ???11.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:15:38 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????0.61", 5 ?0.58", 8 ?0.53", 6 ?0.93",19 ????0 ???0.68" 0.71" ??37.1 28.7 ???9.2 10.4 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.3 ?10.6 ?OT=0.73
> 2012-03-26T06:17:46 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????0.64", 8 ?0.58", 8 ?0.53", 5 ?0.95",16 ????0 ???0.67" ?-- ????35.6 ??- ????9.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:19:15 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????0.60", 7 ?0.56", 7 ?0.54", 7 ?0.91",15 ????0 ???0.66" 0.67" ??32.6 34.1 ???8.9 ?9.3 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.7 ?10.5 ?OT=0.69
> 2012-03-26T06:21:26 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 8 ?0.66", 9 ?0.59", 7 ?0.77",15 ????0 ???0.68" ?-- ????16.9 ??- ????9.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:22:51 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????0.69",11 ?0.62",13 ?0.61", 7 ?0.82",14 ????0 ???0.67" 0.68" ??19.1 18.0 ??10.7 ?9.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?27.2 ?10.5 ?OT=0.70
> ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> =================================================================================================================================================================
> 
> 
> This was with guinding and AO loop closed during the whole OB
> ================================================================================================================================================================
> 2012-03-26T06:31:02 ?625363 ?i_SDSS ???????0.58",10 ?0.59", 6 ?0.53", 6 ?1.22",15 ????1 ???0.74" ?-- ????47.8 ??- ????9.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ??????????????
> 2012-03-26T06:35:43 ?625363 ?i_SDSS ???????0.55",11 ?0.58", 7 ?0.54", 6 ?1.32",19 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ????49.0 ??- ???10.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ???????????????
> 2012-03-26T06:40:27 ?625363 ?i_SDSS ???????0.56",10 ?0.58", 5 ?0.56", 6 ?1.35",20 ????1 ???0.75" ?-- ????49.2 ??- ???10.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ??????????????
> 2012-03-26T06:45:07 ?625363 ?i_SDSS ???????0.54", 7 ?0.59", 8 ?0.57", 9 ?1.33",18 ????1 ???0.78" ?-- ????51.0 ??- ???11.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ??????????????
> 2012-03-26T06:49:51 ?625363 ?i_SDSS ???????0.59",12 ?0.60", 8 ?0.55", 7 ?1.11",14 ????1 ???0.74" 0.75" ??44.1 48.2 ??10.6 10.6 ?????????A ?C ?B ?A ?A ?A ????C ?????????????????1.1 ?OT=0.70
> ================================================================================================================================================================
> 
> In the meantime I'm assigning this to S. Mieske 
> Regards
> Carlos
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- ?Worklog & Comments Section ---------------
> 
> Worklog and Comments : 
> ??03/26/12 11:17:48 ????smieske
> ?????Thanks Carlos for putting this ticket and giving it 'Critical' priority, to which I full agree. I reassign to Optics for the time being, and include Pietro just in case.
> 
> ?????We have had to repeat of order 5-6 hours worth of OBs in the nights March 23 and March 25, due to IQ degradation. 
> 
> ?????It is difficult to make remote analysis. For one, the external IQ is quite good which makes any defocus become very apparent.
> 
> ?????A few questions, trying to isolate the problem:
> 
> ?????- Is the guide probe by any chance physically vignetting part of the FOV, in particular the edges where auxiliary chips are? (should not be the case, but better ask). Is the real position corresponding to that indicated in the GUI?
> ?????- Is the ADC deployed and in SIM? Should not be.
> ?????- Has the noise in the IA images increased strongly? See 44375, 41464.
> ?????- Is the magnitude restriction of IA stars working correctly? Have a look at ocmia.fits images in DETDATA at times before strong IA degradation: are the donuts unsaturated and noise-free?
> ?????- IA corrections are apparently converging, so I assume that correcitons are being sent to the telescope? Please doublecheck by sending a few aberrations via vstaberwriteGUI (or something like that) in twilight. Do standard star aquisition which brings system into shape. Then apply the aberrations and check what the OCAM system sends back in a new aquisition.
> ?????- Are the passive forces controlling the mirrors still being sent at preset, and not every 30s?
> ?????- Do we by any chance have a new focal plane tilt? I see that chip 96 at one edge is typically most out of focus. But this is a remote analysis, and I do not know how this would happen anyway.
> ?????- Is M2 'jumping' spontaneously?
> 
> ?????Any further clues most welcome. I will be at Gemini Observatory the next 3 days, so hopefully Thomas Szeifert has some bright ideas? Thomas comes up on Thursday I think, and me on Friday.
> 
> ?????Thanks,
> ?????Steffen
> 
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Optical 
> ?????Area/Instrument Type Changed: TELESCOPE 
> ?????System/Instrument Changed: OPTICS & SUPPORT 
> ?????Subsystem Changed: ?
> ?????Modified By: smieske 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-26 11:17:48 
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Optical 
> ?????Area/Instrument Type Changed: TELESCOPE 
> ?????System/Instrument Changed: OPTICS & SUPPORT 
> ?????Subsystem Changed: ?
> ?????Modified By: smieske 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-26 11:17:48 
> ??03/26/12 11:48:44 ????tszeifer
> ?????The root cause for the image degradation is the curved focal field of the telescope (principally at wavelength > 550 nm) imaged by a flat detector plane. A little bit of defocus will cause about the degradation reported in the ticket. 
> 
> ?????According to the reports it only occurs in open loop observations and only with the red r,i,z,H_alpha filters.
> 
> ?????It would occur more often when the seeing is very good. The seeing was quit good in the last weeks.
> 
> ?????When ever you detect image degradation you can stop the auto fetch and force an IA.START = "T".
> 
> ?????I think that we will have to repeat >>10 of the observations for this reason.
> ??03/26/12 20:31:48 ????smieske
> ?????Can you please backup all ocmia.fits images from March22nd onwards in DETDATA into some subdirectory. Just to make sure they are not erased. And please, send me a 'ls -ltr ocmia*fits' of DETDATA as it is currently, so we keep the information of timestamp vs. image number.
> 
> ?????Thanks,
> ?????Steffen
> ??03/27/12 02:23:08 ????vst
> ?????Hi Steffen, 
> ?????-The guideprobe is not vignetting
> ?????-ADC is OUT of Focal Plane and not in SIM
> ?????-The magnitude restriction is working OK. Although in some images I saw some noisy images the previous days, the examples that I paste were always OK.
> ?????-I haven't seen M2 jumping.
> 
> ?????Hi Thomas,
> ?????The degradation also happends with AO loop closed as it is shown in the KIDS OB pasted before.
> 
> ?????On the night the 23/03/2012 I enabled a couple of times the IA START keyword to T in order to perform an AO correction (Vphas concatenation) but even with this the degradation persisted.
> 
> ?????===========================================================================================================================================
> ?????2012-03-24T01:48:26 ?639915 ?z_SDSS ???????0.89", 4 ?0.81", 7 ?0.81", 5 ?0.99",12 ????0 ???0.88" ?-- ????16.3 ??- ????7.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:49:53 ?639915 ?z_SDSS ???????0.83", 3 ?0.77", 4 ?0.75", 5 ?0.91", 9 ????1 ???0.84" 0.86" ??17.3 16.8 ???6.7 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.86 ?16.8 ?7.2 ?OT=0.89
> ?????2012-03-24T01:51:55 ?639918 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.74",10 ?0.71", 5 ?0.89",11 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ????19.2 ??- ????7.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:53:25 ?639918 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.73", 9 ?0.69", 5 ?0.87",12 ????0 ???0.78" 0.79" ??19.6 19.4 ???7.6 ?7.7 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?18.1 ?7.4 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-24T01:55:29 ?639921 ?z_SDSS ???????0.82", 8 ?0.58", 4 ?0.59", 5 ?0.91",11 ????1 ???0.75" ?-- ????44.3 ??- ????7.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T01:56:55 ?639921 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78", 4 ?0.61", 9 ?0.56", 4 ?0.90", 9 ????1 ???0.73" 0.74" ??40.9 42.6 ???8.2 ?8.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?26.3 ?7.6 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T01:58:55 ?639924 ?z_SDSS ???????0.82", 5 ?0.64", 7 ?0.61", 5 ?0.89",12 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????35.1 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:00:20 ?639924 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 5 ?0.57", 6 ?0.56", 3 ?0.92",14 ????1 ???0.72" 0.74" ??42.4 38.8 ???8.1 ?8.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?29.4 ?7.7 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T02:02:20 ?639927 ?z_SDSS ???????0.80",10 ?0.57", 3 ?0.54", 4 ?0.99",16 ????1 ???0.76" ?-- ????53.3 ??- ????9.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:03:49 ?639927 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 8 ?0.57", 6 ?0.53", 5 ?0.97",16 ????1 ???0.74" 0.75" ??52.8 53.1 ???9.2 ?9.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?34.1 ?8.0 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-24T02:05:57 ?639930 ?z_SDSS ???????0.90",12 ?0.59", 5 ?0.57", 4 ?0.97",18 ????1 ???0.78" ?-- ????51.0 ??- ????9.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:07:22 ?639930 ?z_SDSS ???????0.86", 8 ?0.62", 4 ?0.58", 3 ?0.92",15 ????1 ???0.80" 0.79" ??49.5 50.3 ???9.3 ?9.6 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?36.8 ?8.3 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-24T02:09:28 ?639933 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88",12 ?0.64", 4 ?0.63", 4 ?1.03",17 ????1 ???0.83" ?-- ????47.1 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:10:53 ?639933 ?z_SDSS ???????0.96",12 ?0.77", 4 ?0.75", 3 ?1.12",14 ????1 ???0.94" 0.89" ??37.5 42.3 ???9.3 ?9.4 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?37.6 ?8.4 ?OT=0.92
> ?????2012-03-24T02:12:59 ?639936 ?z_SDSS ???????0.98",13 ?0.73", 5 ?0.71", 4 ?1.06",13 ????1 ???0.91" ?-- ????43.8 ??- ???10.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:14:28 ?639936 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87",10 ?0.62", 3 ?0.61", 3 ?1.05",15 ????1 ???0.82" 0.86" ??49.8 46.8 ???9.5 ?9.9 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?38.8 ?8.6 ?OT=0.90
> ?????2012-03-24T02:19:53 ?639939 ?z_SDSS ???????0.77", 4 ?0.64", 4 ?0.62", 5 ?0.88", 9 ????1 ???0.75" ?-- ????32.5 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:21:22 ?639939 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 4 ?0.67", 8 ?0.65", 6 ?0.81", 9 ????0 ???0.73" 0.74" ??16.4 24.4 ???7.8 ?7.4 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?37.2 ?8.5 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T02:23:32 ?639942 ?z_SDSS ???????0.83", 5 ?0.74", 7 ?0.72", 7 ?0.86", 9 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????14.1 ??- ????7.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:25:00 ?639942 ?z_SDSS ???????0.93", 4 ?0.81", 5 ?0.76", 4 ?0.90", 7 ????0 ???0.86" 0.82" ??18.1 16.1 ???6.3 ?7.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?35.1 ?8.3 ?OT=0.86
> ?????2012-03-24T02:27:11 ?639945 ?z_SDSS ???????0.85", 4 ?0.77", 7 ?0.73", 7 ?0.90", 5 ????0 ???0.82" ?-- ????18.6 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:28:40 ?639945 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 4 ?0.74", 5 ?0.71", 4 ?0.86", 9 ????0 ???0.82" 0.82" ??22.6 20.6 ???6.2 ?7.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?33.7 ?8.2 ?OT=0.85
> ?????2012-03-24T02:30:44 ?639948 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 4 ?0.80", 6 ?0.78", 4 ?0.99", 8 ????0 ???0.88" ?-- ????19.4 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:32:09 ?639948 ?z_SDSS ???????0.93", 6 ?0.88", 7 ?0.86", 4 ?1.04",10 ????0 ???0.93" 0.91" ??12.5 16.0 ???6.0 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?32.3 ?8.0 ?OT=0.94
> ?????2012-03-24T02:34:18 ?639951 ?z_SDSS ???????0.86", 5 ?0.82", 4 ?0.82", 6 ?0.97", 7 ????0 ???0.86" ?-- ?????9.2 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:35:47 ?639951 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 3 ?0.80", 4 ?0.83", 7 ?0.97",11 ????0 ???0.88" 0.87" ??14.0 11.6 ???6.3 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?30.7 ?7.9 ?OT=0.90
> ?????2012-03-24T02:37:58 ?639954 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87", 3 ?0.79", 5 ?0.84", 6 ?0.98",11 ????0 ???0.87" ?-- ????14.2 ??- ????6.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:39:23 ?639954 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 3 ?0.77", 5 ?0.78", 6 ?0.95", 9 ????0 ???0.84" 0.85" ??17.0 15.6 ???6.8 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?29.6 ?7.8 ?OT=0.89
> ?????2012-03-24T02:41:33 ?639957 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 5 ?0.79", 5 ?0.79", 5 ?0.89",10 ????0 ???0.85" ?-- ????13.9 ??- ????6.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:43:00 ?639957 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 6 ?0.81",10 ?0.82",10 ?0.93", 9 ????0 ???0.85" 0.85" ???9.8 11.8 ???9.1 ?7.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?28.4 ?7.8 ?OT=0.88
> ?????2012-03-24T02:45:11 ?639960 ?z_SDSS ???????0.80", 6 ?0.76", 9 ?0.76", 7 ?0.88", 8 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ????11.4 ??- ????8.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:46:40 ?639960 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87", 4 ?0.84", 8 ?0.86", 9 ?0.94", 9 ????0 ???0.88" 0.84" ???9.0 10.2 ???7.8 ?7.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?27.3 ?7.8 ?OT=0.87
> ?????2012-03-24T02:48:47 ?639963 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.77",10 ?0.75",11 ?0.87", 6 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????10.9 ??- ????8.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:50:16 ?639963 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.74",11 ?0.65",12 ?0.84", 9 ????0 ???0.75" 0.77" ??15.0 12.9 ??11.3 ?9.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?26.4 ?7.9 ?OT=0.80
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> 
> ?????========================================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????Regards
> ?????Carlos
> ??03/27/12 02:38:00 ????vst
> ?????Hi, 
> ?????As requested by S. Mieske I'm adding all the OBs with IQ degradation as Tech Downtime Since 2012-03-23 night
> ?????Regards
> ?????Carlos
> 
> ?????=================================================================================================
> ?????2012-03-24T00:42:46 ?735890 ?NB_659 ???????1.97",40 ?2.28",46 ?2.40",45 ?2.50",50 ??8!! ???2.30" ?-- ?????2.1 ??- ???43.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T00:45:27 ?735890 ?NB_659 ???????2.22",43 ?2.05",40 ?2.20",40 ?2.07",39 ??8!! ???2.12" ?-- ?????1.6 ??- ???37.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T00:48:11 ?735890 ?NB_659 ???????1.84",38 ?1.95",38 ?1.97",38 ?2.03",41 ??8!! ???1.96" 2.13" ???2.0 ?1.9 ??35.7 38.7 ?????????D ?A ?D ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??2.13 ?1.9 ?38.7 ?OT=2.16
> ?????2012-03-24T00:51:41 ?735893 ?NB_659 ???????2.00",28 ?2.01",32 ?1.96",32 ?1.96",32 ??7!! ???1.98" ?-- ?????1.3 ??- ???27.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T00:54:24 ?735893 ?NB_659 ???????1.57",24 ?1.70",27 ?1.69",26 ?1.96",31 ??7!! ???1.76" ?-- ?????5.4 ??- ???25.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T00:57:04 ?735893 ?NB_659 ???????1.98", 8 ?1.97", 7 ?1.95", 6 ?2.04", 8 ????0 ???2.01" 1.92" ???3.6 ?3.4 ???6.9 19.9 ?????????D ?A ?D ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??2.02 ?2.7 ?29.3 ?OT=1.94
> ?????2012-03-24T01:00:36 ?735896 ?NB_659 ???????1.92",26 ?1.98",27 ?1.97",28 ?1.94",29 ??7!! ???1.96" ?-- ?????2.8 ??- ???24.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T01:03:17 ?735896 ?NB_659 ???????1.94",25 ?1.82",22 ?1.82",24 ?1.82",25 ??6!! ???1.85" ?-- ?????2.4 ??- ???21.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T01:06:01 ?735896 ?NB_659 ???????1.32",19 ?1.22",18 ?1.21",19 ?1.41",21 ????2 ???1.30" 1.70" ??12.0 ?5.7 ??16.5 20.9 ?????????D ?A ?D ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.92 ?3.7 ?26.5 ?OT=1.73
> ?????2012-03-24T01:13:51 ?735899 ?r_SDSS ???????0.85", 5 ?0.74", 7 ?0.71", 4 ?0.95",12 ????0 ???0.82" ?-- ????23.6 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:14:58 ?735899 ?r_SDSS ???????0.78", 4 ?0.77", 6 ?0.73", 5 ?0.89", 8 ????0 ???0.81" 0.81" ??14.9 19.2 ???7.0 ?7.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.64 ?7.6 ?21.6 ?OT=0.81
> ?????2012-03-24T01:22:13 ?735902 ?r_SDSS ???????0.93", 8 ?0.82", 7 ?0.79", 4 ?0.99", 9 ????0 ???0.89" ?-- ????19.4 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:23:21 ?735902 ?r_SDSS ???????0.83", 4 ?0.76", 5 ?0.73", 4 ?0.95", 8 ????0 ???0.82" 0.85" ??20.9 20.1 ???6.1 ?6.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.48 ?10.1 ?18.6 ?OT=0.85
> ?????2012-03-24T01:25:01 ?735905 ?r_SDSS ???????0.80", 4 ?0.76", 5 ?0.73", 4 ?0.99", 7 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????21.1 ??- ????6.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:26:10 ?735905 ?r_SDSS ???????0.91", 4 ?0.84", 7 ?0.80", 5 ?0.98", 8 ????0 ???0.89" 0.86" ??15.1 18.1 ???6.7 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.38 ?11.4 ?16.6 ?OT=0.86
> ?????2012-03-24T01:34:48 ?735908 ?i_SDSS ???????0.88", 4 ?0.85", 5 ?0.85", 4 ?1.10",12 ????0 ???0.93" ?-- ????16.0 ??- ????7.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:35:54 ?735908 ?i_SDSS ???????0.86", 4 ?0.88", 4 ?0.86", 5 ?1.11",10 ????0 ???0.95" 0.94" ??14.4 15.2 ???5.9 ?6.6 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.32 ?12.0 ?15.1 ?OT=0.96
> ?????2012-03-24T01:37:32 ?735911 ?i_SDSS ???????0.90", 5 ?0.86", 5 ?0.84", 4 ?1.09",10 ????0 ???0.94" ?-- ????17.8 ??- ????6.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:38:42 ?735911 ?i_SDSS ???????0.96", 5 ?0.96", 5 ?0.94", 5 ?1.13", 7 ????0 ???1.00" 0.97" ???9.5 13.6 ???6.2 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.27 ?12.2 ?14.1 ?OT=1.00
> ?????2012-03-24T01:40:18 ?735914 ?i_SDSS ???????0.95", 4 ?1.00", 4 ?0.96", 4 ?1.13",10 ????0 ???1.03" ?-- ?????8.6 ??- ????6.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:41:23 ?735914 ?i_SDSS ???????1.05", 4 ?1.10", 4 ?1.14", 5 ?1.27", 8 ????0 ???1.16" 1.09" ???7.1 ?7.9 ???5.9 ?6.2 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.25 ?11.7 ?13.2 ?OT=1.13
> ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% bad seeing. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> 
> ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% bad ellipticities. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????============================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????2012-03-24T01:48:26 ?639915 ?z_SDSS ???????0.89", 4 ?0.81", 7 ?0.81", 5 ?0.99",12 ????0 ???0.88" ?-- ????16.3 ??- ????7.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:49:53 ?639915 ?z_SDSS ???????0.83", 3 ?0.77", 4 ?0.75", 5 ?0.91", 9 ????1 ???0.84" 0.86" ??17.3 16.8 ???6.7 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.86 ?16.8 ?7.2 ?OT=0.89
> ?????2012-03-24T01:51:55 ?639918 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.74",10 ?0.71", 5 ?0.89",11 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ????19.2 ??- ????7.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:53:25 ?639918 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.73", 9 ?0.69", 5 ?0.87",12 ????0 ???0.78" 0.79" ??19.6 19.4 ???7.6 ?7.7 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?18.1 ?7.4 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-24T01:55:29 ?639921 ?z_SDSS ???????0.82", 8 ?0.58", 4 ?0.59", 5 ?0.91",11 ????1 ???0.75" ?-- ????44.3 ??- ????7.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T01:56:55 ?639921 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78", 4 ?0.61", 9 ?0.56", 4 ?0.90", 9 ????1 ???0.73" 0.74" ??40.9 42.6 ???8.2 ?8.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?26.3 ?7.6 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T01:58:55 ?639924 ?z_SDSS ???????0.82", 5 ?0.64", 7 ?0.61", 5 ?0.89",12 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????35.1 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:00:20 ?639924 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 5 ?0.57", 6 ?0.56", 3 ?0.92",14 ????1 ???0.72" 0.74" ??42.4 38.8 ???8.1 ?8.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?29.4 ?7.7 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T02:02:20 ?639927 ?z_SDSS ???????0.80",10 ?0.57", 3 ?0.54", 4 ?0.99",16 ????1 ???0.76" ?-- ????53.3 ??- ????9.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:03:49 ?639927 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 8 ?0.57", 6 ?0.53", 5 ?0.97",16 ????1 ???0.74" 0.75" ??52.8 53.1 ???9.2 ?9.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?34.1 ?8.0 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-24T02:05:57 ?639930 ?z_SDSS ???????0.90",12 ?0.59", 5 ?0.57", 4 ?0.97",18 ????1 ???0.78" ?-- ????51.0 ??- ????9.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:07:22 ?639930 ?z_SDSS ???????0.86", 8 ?0.62", 4 ?0.58", 3 ?0.92",15 ????1 ???0.80" 0.79" ??49.5 50.3 ???9.3 ?9.6 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?36.8 ?8.3 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-24T02:09:28 ?639933 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88",12 ?0.64", 4 ?0.63", 4 ?1.03",17 ????1 ???0.83" ?-- ????47.1 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:10:53 ?639933 ?z_SDSS ???????0.96",12 ?0.77", 4 ?0.75", 3 ?1.12",14 ????1 ???0.94" 0.89" ??37.5 42.3 ???9.3 ?9.4 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?37.6 ?8.4 ?OT=0.92
> ?????2012-03-24T02:12:59 ?639936 ?z_SDSS ???????0.98",13 ?0.73", 5 ?0.71", 4 ?1.06",13 ????1 ???0.91" ?-- ????43.8 ??- ???10.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:14:28 ?639936 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87",10 ?0.62", 3 ?0.61", 3 ?1.05",15 ????1 ???0.82" 0.86" ??49.8 46.8 ???9.5 ?9.9 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?38.8 ?8.6 ?OT=0.90
> ?????2012-03-24T02:19:53 ?639939 ?z_SDSS ???????0.77", 4 ?0.64", 4 ?0.62", 5 ?0.88", 9 ????1 ???0.75" ?-- ????32.5 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:21:22 ?639939 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 4 ?0.67", 8 ?0.65", 6 ?0.81", 9 ????0 ???0.73" 0.74" ??16.4 24.4 ???7.8 ?7.4 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?37.2 ?8.5 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T02:23:32 ?639942 ?z_SDSS ???????0.83", 5 ?0.74", 7 ?0.72", 7 ?0.86", 9 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????14.1 ??- ????7.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:25:00 ?639942 ?z_SDSS ???????0.93", 4 ?0.81", 5 ?0.76", 4 ?0.90", 7 ????0 ???0.86" 0.82" ??18.1 16.1 ???6.3 ?7.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?35.1 ?8.3 ?OT=0.86
> ?????2012-03-24T02:27:11 ?639945 ?z_SDSS ???????0.85", 4 ?0.77", 7 ?0.73", 7 ?0.90", 5 ????0 ???0.82" ?-- ????18.6 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:28:40 ?639945 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 4 ?0.74", 5 ?0.71", 4 ?0.86", 9 ????0 ???0.82" 0.82" ??22.6 20.6 ???6.2 ?7.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?33.7 ?8.2 ?OT=0.85
> ?????2012-03-24T02:30:44 ?639948 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 4 ?0.80", 6 ?0.78", 4 ?0.99", 8 ????0 ???0.88" ?-- ????19.4 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:32:09 ?639948 ?z_SDSS ???????0.93", 6 ?0.88", 7 ?0.86", 4 ?1.04",10 ????0 ???0.93" 0.91" ??12.5 16.0 ???6.0 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?32.3 ?8.0 ?OT=0.94
> ?????2012-03-24T02:34:18 ?639951 ?z_SDSS ???????0.86", 5 ?0.82", 4 ?0.82", 6 ?0.97", 7 ????0 ???0.86" ?-- ?????9.2 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:35:47 ?639951 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 3 ?0.80", 4 ?0.83", 7 ?0.97",11 ????0 ???0.88" 0.87" ??14.0 11.6 ???6.3 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?30.7 ?7.9 ?OT=0.90
> ?????2012-03-24T02:37:58 ?639954 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87", 3 ?0.79", 5 ?0.84", 6 ?0.98",11 ????0 ???0.87" ?-- ????14.2 ??- ????6.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:39:23 ?639954 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 3 ?0.77", 5 ?0.78", 6 ?0.95", 9 ????0 ???0.84" 0.85" ??17.0 15.6 ???6.8 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?29.6 ?7.8 ?OT=0.89
> ?????2012-03-24T02:41:33 ?639957 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 5 ?0.79", 5 ?0.79", 5 ?0.89",10 ????0 ???0.85" ?-- ????13.9 ??- ????6.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:43:00 ?639957 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 6 ?0.81",10 ?0.82",10 ?0.93", 9 ????0 ???0.85" 0.85" ???9.8 11.8 ???9.1 ?7.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?28.4 ?7.8 ?OT=0.88
> ?????2012-03-24T02:45:11 ?639960 ?z_SDSS ???????0.80", 6 ?0.76", 9 ?0.76", 7 ?0.88", 8 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ????11.4 ??- ????8.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:46:40 ?639960 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87", 4 ?0.84", 8 ?0.86", 9 ?0.94", 9 ????0 ???0.88" 0.84" ???9.0 10.2 ???7.8 ?7.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?27.3 ?7.8 ?OT=0.87
> ?????2012-03-24T02:48:47 ?639963 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.77",10 ?0.75",11 ?0.87", 6 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????10.9 ??- ????8.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:50:16 ?639963 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.74",11 ?0.65",12 ?0.84", 9 ????0 ???0.75" 0.77" ??15.0 12.9 ??11.3 ?9.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?26.4 ?7.9 ?OT=0.80
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????==========================================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????2012-03-24T04:34:41 ?635618 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 7 ?0.71", 4 ?0.73", 3 ?1.25",16 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????25.8 ??- ????5.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:36:09 ?635618 ?r_SDSS ???????0.88", 3 ?0.77", 4 ?0.78", 6 ?1.15",12 ????0 ???0.87" 0.85" ??19.2 22.5 ???5.4 ?5.6 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.85 ?22.5 ?5.6 ?OT=0.84
> ?????2012-03-24T04:38:16 ?635621 ?r_SDSS ???????0.83", 7 ?0.77", 5 ?0.76", 4 ?1.10",14 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????17.2 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:39:44 ?635621 ?r_SDSS ???????0.79", 7 ?0.73", 8 ?0.72", 4 ?1.17",14 ????0 ???0.81" 0.82" ??23.0 20.1 ???6.5 ?6.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.83 ?21.3 ?5.8 ?OT=0.81
> ?????2012-03-24T04:41:52 ?635624 ?r_SDSS ???????0.81", 4 ?0.77", 4 ?0.77", 4 ?1.16",11 ????0 ???0.85" ?-- ????19.8 ??- ????4.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:43:17 ?635624 ?r_SDSS ???????0.82", 4 ?0.75", 4 ?0.76", 3 ?1.18",11 ????0 ???0.86" 0.85" ??23.4 21.6 ???5.5 ?5.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.84 ?21.4 ?5.6 ?OT=0.84
> ?????2012-03-24T04:45:25 ?635627 ?r_SDSS ???????0.84", 8 ?0.79", 4 ?0.77", 3 ?1.07",10 ????0 ???0.84" ?-- ????15.2 ??- ????4.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:46:50 ?635627 ?r_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.69", 4 ?0.69", 3 ?1.15",14 ????0 ???0.79" 0.81" ??25.4 20.3 ???6.0 ?5.4 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.83 ?21.1 ?5.6 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-24T04:48:55 ?635630 ?r_SDSS ???????0.72", 5 ?0.72", 4 ?0.73", 4 ?1.14",11 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????19.3 ??- ????5.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:50:24 ?635630 ?r_SDSS ???????0.79", 6 ?0.71", 5 ?0.73", 3 ?1.14",13 ????0 ???0.81" 0.80" ??23.3 21.3 ???5.5 ?5.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.83 ?21.2 ?5.5 ?OT=0.79
> ?????2012-03-24T04:52:36 ?635633 ?r_SDSS ???????0.75", 7 ?0.72", 4 ?0.71", 4 ?1.06",12 ????0 ???0.78" ?-- ????18.7 ??- ????5.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:54:03 ?635633 ?r_SDSS ???????0.74", 7 ?0.67", 3 ?0.67", 3 ?1.12",15 ????0 ???0.77" 0.78" ??26.5 22.6 ???5.6 ?5.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?21.4 ?5.5 ?OT=0.76
> ?????2012-03-24T04:56:08 ?635636 ?r_SDSS ???????0.71", 7 ?0.66", 5 ?0.66", 3 ?1.07",12 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????23.6 ??- ????5.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:57:33 ?635636 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 7 ?0.70", 4 ?0.67", 3 ?1.04",11 ????0 ???0.76" 0.76" ??19.7 21.6 ???5.3 ?5.4 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?21.4 ?5.5 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-24T04:59:44 ?635639 ?r_SDSS ???????0.81", 7 ?0.75", 4 ?0.76", 5 ?1.11",13 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????19.6 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:01:12 ?635639 ?r_SDSS ???????0.79", 7 ?0.75", 3 ?0.75", 4 ?1.11",11 ????0 ???0.82" 0.82" ??19.4 19.5 ???5.1 ?5.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?21.2 ?5.5 ?OT=0.81
> ?????2012-03-24T05:06:53 ?635642 ?r_SDSS ???????0.77", 4 ?0.77", 4 ?0.79", 6 ?1.12",14 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????13.9 ??- ????5.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:08:19 ?635642 ?r_SDSS ???????0.75", 4 ?0.71", 3 ?0.71", 4 ?1.15",14 ????0 ???0.80" 0.81" ??24.2 19.0 ???5.7 ?5.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?21.0 ?5.5 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-24T05:10:24 ?635645 ?r_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.69", 4 ?0.71", 3 ?1.20",14 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????23.6 ??- ????5.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:11:54 ?635645 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 6 ?0.73", 3 ?0.74", 3 ?1.19",13 ????0 ???0.81" 0.80" ??20.5 22.1 ???5.1 ?5.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?21.1 ?5.5 ?OT=0.79
> ?????2012-03-24T05:13:58 ?635648 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67", 6 ?0.64", 4 ?0.64", 3 ?1.25",15 ????0 ???0.76" ?-- ????30.9 ??- ????6.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:15:23 ?635648 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 5 ?0.63", 4 ?0.64", 2 ?1.25",15 ????0 ???0.75" 0.76" ??30.9 30.9 ???5.6 ?5.9 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?22.0 ?5.6 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-24T05:17:29 ?635651 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 5 ?0.65", 4 ?0.64", 3 ?1.25",17 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????30.2 ??- ????6.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:18:56 ?635651 ?r_SDSS ???????0.63", 7 ?0.61", 6 ?0.60", 5 ?1.29",16 ????0 ???0.73" 0.74" ??35.5 32.9 ???6.7 ?6.4 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?22.9 ?5.6 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-24T05:21:03 ?635654 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 6 ?0.63", 4 ?0.66", 4 ?1.32",17 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????33.3 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:22:33 ?635654 ?r_SDSS ???????0.68", 6 ?0.61", 4 ?0.62", 3 ?1.26",19 ????0 ???0.76" 0.77" ??36.8 35.0 ???6.7 ?6.7 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?23.8 ?5.7 ?OT=0.75
> ?????2012-03-24T05:24:37 ?635657 ?r_SDSS ???????0.64", 6 ?0.61", 4 ?0.66", 4 ?1.32",18 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????32.9 ??- ????6.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:26:02 ?635657 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 6 ?0.64", 4 ?0.66", 3 ?1.26",16 ????0 ???0.76" 0.76" ??29.7 31.3 ???5.8 ?6.3 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?24.3 ?5.7 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-24T05:28:12 ?635660 ?r_SDSS ???????0.62", 4 ?0.64", 4 ?0.68", 3 ?1.25",14 ????0 ???0.76" ?-- ????28.9 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:29:37 ?635660 ?r_SDSS ???????0.68", 4 ?0.66", 4 ?0.69", 3 ?1.34",18 ????0 ???0.79" 0.78" ??29.8 29.4 ???6.0 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?24.7 ?5.8 ?OT=0.76
> ?????2012-03-24T05:31:42 ?635663 ?r_SDSS ???????0.63", 6 ?0.60", 5 ?0.61", 4 ?1.31",19 ????0 ???0.73" ?-- ????35.6 ??- ????6.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:33:10 ?635663 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67", 4 ?0.66", 3 ?0.67", 3 ?1.18",16 ????0 ???0.76" 0.74" ??26.0 30.8 ???6.0 ?6.5 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?25.1 ?5.8 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-24T05:35:17 ?635666 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 6 ?0.64", 4 ?0.68", 3 ?1.28",18 ????0 ???0.78" ?-- ????30.8 ??- ????6.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:36:42 ?635666 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 4 ?0.66", 3 ?0.68", 4 ?1.24",15 ????0 ???0.76" 0.77" ??25.1 28.0 ???5.5 ?5.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?25.2 ?5.8 ?OT=0.76
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????==================================================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????2012-03-25T07:10:06 ?635208 ?r_SDSS ???????0.84", 7 ?0.81", 5 ?0.80", 3 ?1.20",12 ????0 ???0.90" ?-- ????21.0 ??- ????6.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:11:34 ?635208 ?r_SDSS ???????0.85", 6 ?0.88", 5 ?0.84", 5 ?1.31",15 ????0 ???0.94" 0.92" ??16.7 18.9 ???7.4 ?6.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.92 ?18.9 ?6.8 ?OT=0.90
> ?????2012-03-25T07:13:38 ?635211 ?r_SDSS ???????0.69", 4 ?0.69", 3 ?0.72", 3 ?1.42",19 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????29.3 ??- ????6.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:15:03 ?635211 ?r_SDSS ???????0.71", 4 ?0.69", 4 ?0.78", 5 ?1.43",19 ????0 ???0.85" 0.84" ??30.0 29.6 ???6.7 ?6.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.88 ?24.3 ?6.8 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-25T07:17:09 ?635214 ?r_SDSS ???????0.72", 4 ?0.69", 4 ?0.72", 4 ?1.37",17 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????30.9 ??- ????6.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:18:37 ?635214 ?r_SDSS ???????0.65", 4 ?0.64", 4 ?0.68", 4 ?1.39",19 ????0 ???0.80" 0.81" ??35.3 33.1 ???7.0 ?6.5 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.86 ?27.2 ?6.7 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-25T07:20:51 ?635217 ?r_SDSS ???????0.72", 4 ?0.68", 3 ?0.72", 3 ?1.42",23 ????1 ???0.84" ?-- ????33.9 ??- ????7.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(635207) 
> ?????2012-03-25T07:22:16 ?635217 ?r_SDSS ???????0.83", 3 ?0.83", 3 ?0.87", 3 ?1.35",16 ????0 ???0.93" 0.89" ??18.5 26.2 ???6.0 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.86 ?27.0 ?6.7 ?OT=0.86
> ?????2012-03-25T07:24:25 ?635220 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 6 ?0.69", 5 ?0.75", 4 ?1.50",22 ????1 ???0.86" ?-- ????35.8 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(635207) 
> ?????2012-03-25T07:25:52 ?635220 ?r_SDSS ???????0.60", 4 ?0.58", 4 ?0.63", 3 ?1.51",21 ????1 ???0.78" 0.82" ??45.3 40.5 ???7.0 ?7.5 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.86 ?29.7 ?6.8 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-25T07:35:08 ?635223 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 5 ?0.70", 4 ?0.70", 3 ?1.24",17 ????0 ???0.82" ?-- ????29.2 ??- ????6.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:36:34 ?635223 ?r_SDSS ???????0.73", 6 ?0.71", 3 ?0.70", 4 ?1.11",14 ????0 ???0.79" 0.80" ??22.6 25.9 ???6.6 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.85 ?29.0 ?6.8 ?OT=0.79
> ?????2012-03-25T07:38:41 ?635226 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 3 ?0.75", 6 ?0.75", 5 ?1.21",15 ????0 ???0.84" ?-- ????21.9 ??- ????7.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:40:10 ?635226 ?r_SDSS ???????0.63", 5 ?0.61", 3 ?0.62", 2 ?1.22",18 ????0 ???0.75" 0.79" ??38.6 30.3 ???6.8 ?6.9 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.84 ?29.2 ?6.8 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-25T07:42:14 ?635229 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 4 ?0.63", 4 ?0.66", 3 ?1.35",22 ????1 ???0.80" ?-- ????37.8 ??- ????7.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(635207) 
> ?????2012-03-25T07:43:39 ?635229 ?r_SDSS ???????0.64", 5 ?0.59", 5 ?0.66", 5 ?1.35",21 ????1 ???0.79" 0.80" ??40.2 39.0 ???7.7 ?7.5 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.83 ?30.4 ?6.9 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-25T07:48:28 ?635232 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 3 ?0.64", 4 ?0.68", 3 ?1.23",18 ????0 ???0.78" ?-- ????29.7 ??- ????6.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:49:56 ?635232 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 7 ?0.66", 4 ?0.62", 3 ?1.05",12 ????0 ???0.74" 0.76" ??28.0 28.9 ???5.8 ?6.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.83 ?30.3 ?6.8 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-25T07:51:59 ?635235 ?r_SDSS ???????0.80", 7 ?0.77", 6 ?0.77", 8 ?1.03",11 ????0 ???0.82" ?-- ????12.9 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:53:25 ?635235 ?r_SDSS ???????0.68", 5 ?0.69", 6 ?0.70", 9 ?1.06",11 ????0 ???0.76" 0.79" ??18.6 15.8 ???7.1 ?6.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?28.8 ?6.8 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-25T07:55:32 ?635238 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 8 ?0.70", 4 ?0.70", 4 ?1.03",13 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????15.4 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:57:01 ?635238 ?r_SDSS ???????0.68", 6 ?0.69", 4 ?0.65", 5 ?1.09",14 ????0 ???0.75" 0.75" ??21.9 18.7 ???6.3 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?27.9 ?6.7 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-25T07:59:11 ?635241 ?r_SDSS ???????0.69", 5 ?0.67", 7 ?0.67", 7 ?1.02",13 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????20.1 ??- ????7.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:00:40 ?635241 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76",10 ?0.76", 7 ?0.71", 8 ?0.87", 8 ????0 ???0.76" 0.76" ???5.5 12.8 ???7.1 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?26.6 ?6.8 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-25T08:02:47 ?635244 ?r_SDSS ???????0.73", 6 ?0.72", 7 ?0.73", 8 ?0.98",10 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????12.7 ??- ????7.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:04:12 ?635244 ?r_SDSS ???????0.78",11 ?0.83", 8 ?0.75",10 ?0.91", 7 ????0 ???0.80" 0.79" ???3.7 ?8.2 ???7.7 ?7.5 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?25.2 ?6.8 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-25T08:06:26 ?635247 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 4 ?0.74", 7 ?0.75", 9 ?1.00", 8 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ????13.0 ??- ????7.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:07:54 ?635247 ?r_SDSS ???????0.71", 5 ?0.72", 7 ?0.74",10 ?1.10",11 ????0 ???0.80" 0.80" ??16.6 14.8 ???7.7 ?7.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?24.5 ?6.9 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-25T08:10:06 ?635250 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 3 ?0.74", 6 ?0.74", 7 ?1.05",11 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????14.8 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:11:31 ?635250 ?r_SDSS ???????0.79", 7 ?0.84", 8 ?0.78", 8 ?0.95", 7 ????0 ???0.84" 0.81" ???6.6 10.7 ???7.4 ?7.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?23.6 ?6.9 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-25T08:13:46 ?635253 ?r_SDSS ???????0.78", 6 ?0.80", 8 ?0.78", 9 ?0.98", 7 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ?????8.3 ??- ????7.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:15:11 ?635253 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 4 ?0.73", 5 ?0.72", 6 ?1.11",14 ????0 ???0.81" 0.82" ??21.5 14.9 ???6.5 ?7.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?23.0 ?6.9 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-25T08:17:19 ?635256 ?r_SDSS ???????0.72", 4 ?0.74", 7 ?0.74", 7 ?1.02",10 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????13.8 ??- ????7.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:18:48 ?635256 ?r_SDSS ???????0.71", 3 ?0.72", 7 ?0.74", 8 ?1.09",12 ????0 ???0.80" 0.80" ??19.1 16.4 ???7.7 ?7.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?22.6 ?6.9 ?OT=0.78
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????========================================================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????2012-03-26T00:54:58 ?736335 ?NB_659 ???????0.77", 4 ?0.70", 4 ?0.71", 4 ?1.36",21 ????1 ???0.86" ?-- ????34.9 ??- ????8.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T00:57:40 ?736335 ?NB_659 ???????0.76", 3 ?0.71", 5 ?0.67", 4 ?1.29",19 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????35.9 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:00:25 ?736335 ?NB_659 ???????0.74", 5 ?0.72", 4 ?0.72", 4 ?1.39",22 ????2 ???0.87" 0.85" ??35.0 35.3 ???8.9 ?8.3 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.85 ?35.3 ?8.3 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-26T01:03:45 ?736338 ?NB_659 ???????0.86", 3 ?0.83", 6 ?0.82", 6 ?1.30",16 ????1 ???0.94" ?-- ????24.8 ??- ????8.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T01:06:28 ?736338 ?NB_659 ???????0.78", 5 ?0.73", 4 ?0.71", 5 ?1.25",18 ????0 ???0.85" ?-- ????32.4 ??- ????8.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:09:08 ?736338 ?NB_659 ???????0.79", 6 ?0.77", 5 ?0.72", 3 ?1.25",18 ????0 ???0.87" 0.89" ??28.7 28.6 ???7.7 ?8.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.87 ?32.0 ?8.2 ?OT=0.85
> ?????2012-03-26T01:12:27 ?736341 ?NB_659 ???????0.85", 5 ?0.82", 4 ?0.78", 7 ?1.26",15 ????1 ???0.91" ?-- ????24.7 ??- ????8.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T01:15:10 ?736341 ?NB_659 ???????0.92", 6 ?0.88", 3 ?0.83", 5 ?1.16",13 ????0 ???0.95" ?-- ????17.1 ??- ????7.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:17:54 ?736341 ?NB_659 ???????0.90", 8 ?0.86", 6 ?0.79", 4 ?1.19",16 ????0 ???0.93" 0.93" ??22.1 21.3 ???7.9 ?7.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.89 ?28.4 ?8.1 ?OT=0.88
> ?????2012-03-26T01:25:26 ?736344 ?r_SDSS ???????1.36", 7 ?1.27",13 ?1.17", 8 ?1.41",14 ????0 ???1.30" ?-- ?????8.2 ??- ????9.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:26:36 ?736344 ?r_SDSS ???????0.90", 3 ?0.85", 4 ?0.82", 3 ?1.17",14 ????1 ???0.95" 1.12" ??25.5 16.8 ???7.3 ?8.6 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.95 ?25.5 ?8.2 ?OT=1.04
> ?????2012-03-26T01:29:31 ?736347 ?r_SDSS ???????1.12", 4 ?1.11", 8 ?1.08", 5 ?1.26",10 ????0 ???1.15" ?-- ?????7.9 ??- ????6.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:30:37 ?736347 ?r_SDSS ???????1.18", 6 ?1.10", 4 ?1.12", 5 ?1.40",14 ????0 ???1.19" 1.17" ??11.8 ?9.9 ???7.0 ?6.9 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.99 ?22.4 ?7.9 ?OT=1.08
> ?????2012-03-26T01:32:22 ?736350 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 3 ?0.65", 4 ?0.67", 3 ?1.37",22 ????2 ???0.84" ?-- ????43.7 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T01:33:31 ?736350 ?r_SDSS ???????0.93", 3 ?0.88", 5 ?0.87", 4 ?1.20",14 ????0 ???0.96" 0.90" ??19.1 31.4 ???6.9 ?7.5 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.98 ?23.9 ?7.9 ?OT=0.84
> ?????2012-03-26T01:41:55 ?736353 ?i_SDSS ???????0.76", 6 ?0.70", 4 ?0.70", 4 ?1.15",17 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????28.1 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:43:05 ?736353 ?i_SDSS ???????0.65", 5 ?0.65", 4 ?0.64", 4 ?1.39",24 ????2 ???0.81" 0.82" ??39.6 33.9 ???9.2 ?8.6 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.96 ?25.3 ?8.0 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-26T01:45:03 ?736356 ?i_SDSS ???????0.75", 3 ?0.64", 4 ?0.66", 4 ?1.34",25 ????2 ???0.82" ?-- ????43.0 ??- ????8.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T01:46:08 ?736356 ?i_SDSS ???????0.89",10 ?0.79", 7 ?0.76", 9 ?1.15",12 ????0 ???0.88" 0.85" ??22.4 32.7 ??10.1 ?9.4 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.94 ?26.2 ?8.2 ?OT=0.81
> ?????2012-03-26T01:48:40 ?736359 ?i_SDSS ???????0.78", 8 ?0.69", 6 ?0.69", 4 ?1.28",22 ????2 ???0.84" ?-- ????35.9 ??- ????9.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T01:49:48 ?736359 ?i_SDSS ???????0.56", 6 ?0.55", 4 ?0.53", 4 ?1.47",25 ????2 ???0.75" 0.79" ??56.9 46.4 ???9.5 ?9.4 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.93 ?28.5 ?8.3 ?OT=0.76
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????======================================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????2012-03-26T05:14:57 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78",14 ?0.82",14 ?0.77",16 ?0.91",10 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ?????3.2 ??- ???14.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:16:24 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????0.65", 4 ?0.63", 6 ?0.55", 4 ?0.86",13 ????1 ???0.73" 0.77" ??39.8 21.5 ???9.0 11.6 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.77 ?21.5 ?11.6 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-26T05:23:45 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????0.69", 6 ?0.63",13 ?0.67",15 ?1.03",16 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????30.2 ??- ???13.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:25:15 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????0.52", 9 ?0.51", 7 ?0.48", 3 ?1.02",16 ????1 ???0.70" 0.73" ??58.8 44.5 ???9.5 11.3 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?33.0 ?11.4 ?OT=0.76
> ?????2012-03-26T05:27:21 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 5 ?0.63",10 ?0.61",10 ?0.93",15 ????0 ???0.71" ?-- ????23.5 ??- ????9.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:28:46 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.77", 6 ?0.62",10 ?0.58",12 ?0.96",14 ????0 ???0.74" 0.72" ??39.6 31.6 ??10.7 10.1 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?32.5 ?11.0 ?OT=0.75
> ?????2012-03-26T05:30:46 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84",10 ?0.80",14 ?0.74",17 ?0.81",14 ????1 ???0.79" ?-- ?????3.8 ??- ???13.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> ?????2012-03-26T05:32:12 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.76", 8 ?0.68",16 ?0.66",12 ?0.93",17 ????0 ???0.75" 0.77" ??18.9 11.3 ??12.4 12.9 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?27.2 ?11.5 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-26T05:34:15 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.71", 6 ?0.61", 9 ?0.62", 7 ?1.07",20 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ????33.4 ??- ????9.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:35:44 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.66", 6 ?0.58",10 ?0.58", 6 ?0.99",20 ????0 ???0.71" 0.72" ??35.7 34.5 ???9.9 ?9.7 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?28.7 ?11.1 ?OT=0.75
> ?????2012-03-26T05:37:47 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????0.71", 6 ?0.61",11 ?0.56", 9 ?0.77",14 ????0 ???0.69" ?-- ????29.9 ??- ???10.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:39:15 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????0.68", 4 ?0.57", 8 ?0.57", 6 ?1.00",22 ????1 ???0.71" 0.70" ??40.2 35.1 ???9.5 10.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?29.7 ?10.9 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-26T05:41:21 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 8 ?0.70",14 ?0.65", 9 ?0.92",19 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ????18.5 ??- ???11.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:42:49 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.70",11 ?0.63", 8 ?0.80",13 ????0 ???0.72" 0.73" ??18.7 18.6 ??10.1 10.8 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?28.2 ?10.9 ?OT=0.76
> ?????2012-03-26T05:44:52 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 6 ?0.56", 9 ?0.56", 8 ?0.88",16 ????0 ???0.66" ?-- ????34.3 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:46:21 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.63", 6 ?0.53",10 ?0.51", 7 ?0.90",20 ????1 ???0.65" 0.66" ??40.0 37.2 ???9.5 ?9.6 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.73 ?29.3 ?10.7 ?OT=0.68
> ?????2012-03-26T05:52:44 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73",14 ?0.74",17 ?0.60",11 ?0.68", 9 ????0 ???0.71" ?-- ????14.2 ??- ???13.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:54:13 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????0.59", 5 ?0.51", 7 ?0.47", 6 ?0.92",18 ????1 ???0.65" 0.68" ??50.5 32.4 ???9.3 11.2 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?29.6 ?10.8 ?OT=0.70
> ?????2012-03-26T05:56:23 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 7 ?0.65",12 ?0.56", 6 ?0.82",12 ????0 ???0.70" ?-- ????23.8 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:57:53 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 8 ?0.66",13 ?0.59", 8 ?0.82",11 ????0 ???0.70" 0.70" ??23.1 23.4 ??10.5 10.1 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?29.0 ?10.7 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-26T05:59:55 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 4 ?0.54", 8 ?0.51", 6 ?0.86",16 ????0 ???0.66" ?-- ????39.5 ??- ????8.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:01:20 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????0.65", 4 ?0.55", 8 ?0.50", 8 ?0.92",15 ????1 ???0.68" 0.67" ??45.1 42.3 ???9.4 ?9.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?30.2 ?10.6 ?OT=0.69
> ?????2012-03-26T06:03:28 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????0.62", 9 ?0.64",10 ?0.60", 9 ?0.89",10 ????0 ???0.70" ?-- ????26.1 ??- ???10.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:04:54 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????0.63", 6 ?0.58",10 ?0.56", 7 ?0.91",14 ????0 ???0.69" 0.69" ??32.6 29.3 ???9.4 ?9.7 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?30.1 ?10.5 ?OT=0.72
> ?????2012-03-26T06:07:02 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75",13 ?0.74",14 ?0.72",12 ?0.76",10 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ?????2.2 ??- ???12.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:08:31 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????0.90",16 ?0.90",14 ?0.81",13 ?0.78", 6 ????0 ???0.84" 0.79" ???1.8 ?2.0 ??13.5 12.8 ?????????A ?A ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?28.0 ?10.7 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-26T06:10:39 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????0.76",11 ?0.78",16 ?0.70",10 ?0.80", 9 ????1 ???0.76" ?-- ?????6.9 ??- ???12.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> ?????2012-03-26T06:12:05 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????0.74", 3 ?0.64", 7 ?0.59", 5 ?0.87",12 ????0 ???0.72" 0.74" ??27.6 17.3 ???7.8 10.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.2 ?10.6 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-26T06:14:13 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78",12 ?0.72",14 ?0.60",10 ?0.83",12 ????0 ???0.73" ?-- ????20.3 ??- ???11.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:15:38 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????0.61", 5 ?0.58", 8 ?0.53", 6 ?0.93",19 ????0 ???0.68" 0.71" ??37.1 28.7 ???9.2 10.4 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.3 ?10.6 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-26T06:17:46 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????0.64", 8 ?0.58", 8 ?0.53", 5 ?0.95",16 ????0 ???0.67" ?-- ????35.6 ??- ????9.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:19:15 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????0.60", 7 ?0.56", 7 ?0.54", 7 ?0.91",15 ????0 ???0.66" 0.67" ??32.6 34.1 ???8.9 ?9.3 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.7 ?10.5 ?OT=0.69
> ?????2012-03-26T06:21:26 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 8 ?0.66", 9 ?0.59", 7 ?0.77",15 ????0 ???0.68" ?-- ????16.9 ??- ????9.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:22:51 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????0.69",11 ?0.62",13 ?0.61", 7 ?0.82",14 ????0 ???0.67" 0.68" ??19.1 18.0 ??10.7 ?9.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?27.2 ?10.5 ?OT=0.70
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????=============================================================================================================================================================
> 
> 
> ?????2012-03-26T08:05:55 ?635774 ?r_SDSS ???????0.69", 7 ?0.65", 4 ?0.66", 4 ?1.16",17 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????28.0 ??- ????6.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:07:24 ?635774 ?r_SDSS ???????0.69", 7 ?0.66", 3 ?0.68", 3 ?1.28",20 ????1 ???0.78" 0.77" ??30.8 29.4 ???6.2 ?6.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.77 ?29.4 ?6.2 ?OT=0.75
> ?????2012-03-26T08:09:28 ?635777 ?r_SDSS ???????0.82",11 ?0.77", 8 ?0.69", 5 ?1.05",12 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????16.9 ??- ????6.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:10:54 ?635777 ?r_SDSS ???????0.96",16 ?0.90", 9 ?0.76", 6 ?0.94", 8 ????0 ???0.85" 0.82" ???5.9 11.4 ???7.9 ?7.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?20.4 ?6.8 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-26T08:13:02 ?635780 ?r_SDSS ???????0.81",11 ?0.75", 7 ?0.66", 7 ?0.99",10 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????14.1 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:14:30 ?635780 ?r_SDSS ???????0.74",12 ?0.71", 8 ?0.62", 6 ?1.02",10 ????0 ???0.72" 0.73" ??18.8 16.5 ???7.1 ?7.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.77 ?19.1 ?6.9 ?OT=0.72
> ?????2012-03-26T08:16:38 ?635783 ?r_SDSS ???????0.88",17 ?0.83",11 ?0.61", 7 ?0.95",11 ????0 ???0.76" ?-- ????11.6 ??- ????9.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:18:04 ?635783 ?r_SDSS ???????0.80",15 ?0.75",10 ?0.61", 7 ?1.02",13 ????0 ???0.75" 0.76" ??17.6 14.6 ???8.8 ?9.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.77 ?18.0 ?7.4 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-26T08:20:12 ?635786 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67",12 ?0.63", 7 ?0.57", 6 ?1.12",14 ????0 ???0.70" ?-- ????29.2 ??- ????7.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:21:37 ?635786 ?r_SDSS ???????0.80",10 ?0.73", 7 ?0.68", 5 ?1.07",13 ????0 ???0.78" 0.74" ??20.3 24.8 ???6.9 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?19.3 ?7.4 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-26T08:23:41 ?635789 ?r_SDSS ???????0.71",10 ?0.68", 7 ?0.67", 6 ?1.17",16 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????25.9 ??- ????7.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:25:11 ?635789 ?r_SDSS ???????0.73",11 ?0.70", 6 ?0.68", 6 ?1.05",14 ????0 ???0.76" 0.77" ??19.9 22.9 ???6.9 ?7.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?19.9 ?7.4 ?OT=0.75
> ?????2012-03-26T08:27:13 ?635792 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67", 6 ?0.63", 4 ?0.66", 3 ?1.21",19 ????0 ???0.76" ?-- ????30.1 ??- ????6.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:28:38 ?635792 ?r_SDSS ???????0.69", 8 ?0.65", 5 ?0.64", 4 ?1.15",17 ????0 ???0.75" 0.76" ??28.2 29.2 ???6.5 ?6.6 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?21.2 ?7.3 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-26T08:30:44 ?635795 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67", 7 ?0.66", 6 ?0.65", 5 ?1.21",17 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????27.3 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:32:09 ?635795 ?r_SDSS ???????0.60", 7 ?0.59", 4 ?0.60", 3 ?1.28",18 ????0 ???0.72" 0.73" ??35.5 31.4 ???6.5 ?6.8 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?22.5 ?7.2 ?OT=0.72
> ?????2012-03-26T08:37:25 ?635798 ?r_SDSS ???????0.57", 4 ?0.55", 4 ?0.54", 3 ?1.12",16 ????0 ???0.67" ?-- ????37.8 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:38:54 ?635798 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67", 8 ?0.70", 7 ?0.65", 6 ?0.93",12 ????0 ???0.72" 0.70" ??13.4 25.6 ???6.4 ?6.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?22.9 ?7.1 ?OT=0.68
> ?????2012-03-26T08:40:55 ?635801 ?r_SDSS ???????0.54", 3 ?0.54", 4 ?0.58", 3 ?1.42",23 ????1 ???0.71" ?-- ????43.8 ??- ????6.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(635773) 
> ?????2012-03-26T08:42:20 ?635801 ?r_SDSS ???????0.49", 4 ?0.50", 4 ?0.55", 4 ?1.44",23 ????1 ???0.70" 0.70" ??48.5 46.1 ???7.2 ?7.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?25.2 ?7.1 ?OT=0.69
> ?????2012-03-26T08:44:20 ?635804 ?r_SDSS ???????0.56", 7 ?0.57", 4 ?0.60", 4 ?1.13",16 ????0 ???0.68" ?-- ????28.5 ??- ????6.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:45:49 ?635804 ?r_SDSS ???????0.50", 3 ?0.51", 4 ?0.55", 3 ?1.41",23 ????1 ???0.68" 0.68" ??46.0 37.3 ???7.3 ?6.9 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?26.3 ?7.1 ?OT=0.67
> ?????2012-03-26T08:47:47 ?635807 ?r_SDSS ???????0.57", 4 ?0.56", 4 ?0.60", 3 ?1.33",22 ????1 ???0.72" ?-- ????40.1 ??- ????6.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(635773) 
> ?????2012-03-26T08:49:15 ?635807 ?r_SDSS ???????0.61", 3 ?0.62", 5 ?0.67", 4 ?1.34",19 ????0 ???0.76" 0.74" ??33.1 36.6 ???7.3 ?7.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?27.1 ?7.1 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-26T08:51:18 ?635810 ?r_SDSS ???????0.57", 4 ?0.56", 4 ?0.61", 4 ?1.38",20 ????0 ???0.72" ?-- ????39.7 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:52:43 ?635810 ?r_SDSS ???????0.58", 2 ?0.58", 6 ?0.62", 5 ?1.39",20 ????1 ???0.75" 0.73" ??38.9 39.3 ???7.5 ?7.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?28.1 ?7.1 ?OT=0.72
> ?????2012-03-26T08:54:47 ?635813 ?r_SDSS ???????0.83", 3 ?0.81", 3 ?0.86", 3 ?1.26",14 ????0 ???0.91" ?-- ????18.5 ??- ????5.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:56:16 ?635813 ?r_SDSS ???????0.86", 4 ?0.87", 4 ?0.89", 3 ?1.27",15 ????0 ???0.95" 0.93" ??15.7 17.1 ???5.4 ?5.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?27.3 ?7.0 ?OT=0.91
> ?????2012-03-26T08:58:30 ?635816 ?r_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.84", 4 ?0.90", 3 ?1.38",17 ????0 ???0.95" ?-- ????16.7 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:59:56 ?635816 ?r_SDSS ???????0.72", 4 ?0.73", 4 ?0.76", 4 ?1.13",13 ????0 ???0.81" 0.88" ??17.6 17.1 ???5.3 ?5.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?26.6 ?6.9 ?OT=0.86
> ?????2012-03-26T09:02:09 ?635819 ?r_SDSS ???????0.68", 4 ?0.68", 4 ?0.70", 5 ?1.17",14 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????21.3 ??- ????5.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T09:03:34 ?635819 ?r_SDSS ???????0.64", 5 ?0.66", 6 ?0.66", 5 ?1.14",15 ????0 ???0.74" 0.76" ??22.0 21.7 ???6.4 ?6.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?26.3 ?6.8 ?OT=0.74
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????=========================================================================================================================================================
> 
> 
> 
> ??03/27/12 05:17:40 ????vst
> ?????As requested by S. Mieske I'm adding more OBs with IQ degradation. 
> ?????Regards
> ?????Carlos
> ?????The following is from 2012/03/22 night
> ?????===============================================================================================================================================
> ?????2012-03-23T06:33:03 ?736830 ?NB_659 ???????1.17",15 ?0.95", 6 ?0.93", 7 ?1.00", 9 ????0 ???1.01" ?-- ????13.5 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:35:48 ?736830 ?NB_659 ???????1.11",16 ?0.90", 7 ?0.92", 6 ?1.01", 6 ????0 ???0.98" ?-- ????13.2 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:38:31 ?736830 ?NB_659 ???????1.02",14 ?0.83", 7 ?0.84", 7 ?0.89", 9 ????0 ???0.89" 0.96" ??12.5 13.0 ???8.0 ?8.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??0.96 ?13.0 ?8.0 ?OT=0.91
> ?????2012-03-23T06:42:40 ?736833 ?NB_659 ???????1.22",16 ?0.85", 6 ?0.89", 6 ?1.00", 6 ????0 ???1.00" ?-- ????24.9 ??- ????8.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:45:24 ?736833 ?NB_659 ???????1.26",10 ?1.07",10 ?1.07", 9 ?1.12", 8 ????0 ???1.13" ?-- ????10.3 ??- ????9.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:48:08 ?736833 ?NB_659 ???????1.26",15 ?1.02", 5 ?1.05", 5 ?1.17", 5 ????0 ???1.11" 1.08" ??15.6 16.9 ???7.4 ?8.4 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.02 ?15.0 ?8.2 ?OT=1.02
> ?????2012-03-23T06:51:24 ?736836 ?NB_659 ???????1.20", 8 ?1.08", 4 ?1.11", 5 ?1.17", 5 ????0 ???1.14" ?-- ?????7.8 ??- ????5.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:54:08 ?736836 ?NB_659 ???????1.24",14 ?0.96", 4 ?0.99", 5 ?1.07", 4 ????0 ???1.06" ?-- ????15.9 ??- ????6.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:56:51 ?736836 ?NB_659 ???????1.33",13 ?1.17", 4 ?1.21", 7 ?1.23", 7 ????0 ???1.23" 1.14" ???7.5 10.4 ???6.7 ?6.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.06 ?13.4 ?7.5 ?OT=1.07
> ?????2012-03-23T07:03:27 ?736839 ?r_SDSS ???????1.14",12 ?0.94", 8 ?0.99",11 ?1.09",14 ????0 ???1.02" ?-- ?????9.8 ??- ????9.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T07:04:37 ?736839 ?r_SDSS ???????1.15",12 ?0.98", 6 ?1.00", 7 ?1.04",12 ????0 ???1.02" 1.02" ???5.0 ?7.4 ???7.7 ?8.6 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.05 ?11.9 ?7.8 ?OT=0.95
> ?????2012-03-23T07:06:20 ?736842 ?r_SDSS ???????1.29", 6 ?1.28",10 ?1.35",13 ?1.45",14 ????0 ???1.32" ?-- ?????2.5 ??- ????9.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T07:07:29 ?736842 ?r_SDSS ???????1.12", 6 ?0.99", 8 ?1.05", 6 ?1.10", 8 ????0 ???1.04" 1.18" ???6.0 ?4.2 ???6.3 ?8.1 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.08 ?10.4 ?7.8 ?OT=1.09
> ?????2012-03-23T07:09:11 ?736845 ?r_SDSS ???????1.43",17 ?1.21", 9 ?1.24",10 ?1.24",12 ????0 ???1.26" ?-- ?????5.4 ??- ???10.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T07:10:20 ?736845 ?r_SDSS ???????1.18",11 ?0.96", 8 ?1.03",10 ?1.10",12 ????0 ???1.06" 1.16" ??12.5 ?9.0 ???9.1 10.0 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.09 ?10.2 ?8.2 ?OT=1.08
> ?????2012-03-23T07:15:09 ?736848 ?i_SDSS ???????1.23",21 ?0.71", 8 ?0.74",10 ?0.79", 8 ????1 ???0.88" ?-- ????33.9 ??- ???10.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736829) 
> ?????2012-03-23T07:16:20 ?736848 ?i_SDSS ???????1.14",20 ?0.71", 4 ?0.79", 6 ?0.81", 7 ????0 ???0.86" 0.87" ??26.3 30.1 ???7.8 ?9.2 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.06 ?13.0 ?8.3 ?OT=0.84
> ?????2012-03-23T07:18:08 ?736851 ?i_SDSS ???????1.17",21 ?0.87", 8 ?0.88",11 ?0.93",11 ????1 ???0.95" ?-- ????15.8 ??- ???11.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736829) 
> ?????2012-03-23T07:19:13 ?736851 ?i_SDSS ???????1.04",12 ?0.85",11 ?0.92",13 ?1.01",16 ????0 ???0.94" 0.94" ??10.0 12.9 ??11.6 11.3 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.04 ?13.0 ?8.7 ?OT=0.91
> ?????2012-03-23T07:20:54 ?736854 ?i_SDSS ???????1.20",21 ?0.81", 7 ?0.93",11 ?0.91", 9 ????1 ???0.95" ?-- ????18.0 ??- ???10.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736829) 
> ?????2012-03-23T07:22:03 ?736854 ?i_SDSS ???????1.35",18 ?0.88", 8 ?0.90", 9 ?0.99",10 ????1 ???1.03" 0.99" ??27.5 22.7 ??11.5 10.8 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.04 ?14.1 ?9.0 ?OT=0.95
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????===================================================================================================================================================
> ??03/27/12 07:01:53 ????vst
> ?????Hi, 
> ?????During the execution of OBID 607044. The AO stars were selected by hand and they were center OK. But during exposure #2 they started to drift.
> ?????So Coma increased a lot and guiding was lost.
> 
> ?????While the 3th exposure was running, I selected 2 new AO stars.
> ?????The files are:
> ?????ocmia.1813.fits
> ?????ocmia.1813.fits
> ?????ocmia.1814.fits
> ?????ocmia.1815.fits
> ?????ocmia.1817.fits
> 
> ?????under DETDATA at wocam
> ?????Regards
> ?????Carlos
> ??03/27/12 09:45:56 ????vst
> ?????Hi, 
> ?????The following is the Tech downtime per night since 22/03/2012 
> 
> ?????22/03/2012->00:52
> ?????23/03/2012->03:49
> ?????24/03/2012->01:15
> ?????25/03/2012->04:05
> ?????26/03/2012->02:38
> 
> ?????Total ?Tech Downtime= 12:36
> ?????Regards
> ?????Carlos
> ??03/27/12 10:50:17 ????smieske
> ?????As discussed with Carlos, the amount of OBs with IQ degradation is much higher than normal, and occurs in both open and closed loop. Therefore our interpretation is that there is something else happening, than just the typical occasional defocus. And hence we assign this as technical downtime until clarified. Does everything look normal at the phyiscal telescope/instrument interface? Is the AG/IA integration time OK (20-30s)?
> 
> ?????Thanks,
> ?????Steffen
> ??03/28/12 03:12:38 ????vst
> ?????HI:During this night I started with KIDS OBs and I got much ellipticity. and also image degradation
> ?????First of all always the automatic mode failed to acquire guiding and when doing it manually, the guide stars availables were not coincident with trhe red circles that shows well known ?catalogue guide stars. Then after every exposure the guiding was lost. Another strange behavior is related with IA stars. IA stars also were always selected manually and most of the time were stars far away from catalogue points (red circles) While the observation was running I could clearly see that the IA stars in the patch started to drift ending at a very corner of the square patch.
> ?????As a result of this images on science rtd were elongated most of the time.
> ?????Please consider this in your analysis.
> ?????Thanks
> ?????NJI
> ??03/28/12 04:26:03 ????smieske
> ?????Adding 01:04 for OB 607044 from night March 26/27 to downtime.
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/28/12 04:28:41 ????smieske
> ?????Adding 01:04 for OB 607044 from night March 26/27 to downtime.
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/28/12 04:35:35 ????smieske
> ?????Can somebody please look at this problem. Some issue with tracking or M2 motion? We are loosing several hours per night.
> ??03/28/12 11:11:11 ????sguisard
> ?????Sorry,
> 
> ?????No clue nor knowledge about this system. ?I prefer to reassign to the person who did the commissioning and acceptance of it for a quicker analysis and asolution.
> ?????If he needs specific help from Optics he can contact us.
> 
> ?????Stephane
> 
> ?????Assignee changed: tszeifer 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: sguisard 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 11:11:10 
> ?????Assignee changed: tszeifer 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: sguisard 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 11:11:10 
> ??03/28/12 12:59:04 ????smieske
> ?????Dear all,
> 
> ?????copy&paste of email from Pietro. I take the freedom to reassign to SW. Can you please have a look whether the pointing model parameters are currently applied. If you find that everything is OK, you can reassign to Thomas/myself.
> 
> ?????Cheers,
> ?????Steffen
> 
> 
> ?????Dear Steffen,
> 
> ?????I would also check the pointing model parameters loaded in the 3 LCUs (ltvaz, ltvalt, ltvadc).
> ?????The model is certainly still good, but we should check if it is currently applied.
> ?????The parameters are loaded from WS side, with the same VLT sw. ?An useful command might be GETTERM -> aztrkServer (or alttrkServer, rottrkServer).
> 
> ?????2-3 times I experienced that these parameters were not loaded correctly and the pointing became suddenly poor. The reason was that, if I remember well, the parameters are loaded only when the ws software (trkws) is initialized. If one LCU is not ready to receive the parameters (e.g. because it is switched off or is rebooting) in that moment, maybe afterward that axis will work without any pointing model. If you are in such conditions the automatic selection of guide stars will certainly fail and the stars will drift more than usual.
> 
> ?????If that is the case, the most radical way to recover should be:
> ?????1) reboot the 3 LCUs,
> ?????2) check the parameters on the 3 LCUs (I think they should be all 0)
> ?????3) send INIT - ONLINE to trkws
> ?????4) check the pointing model parameters again on the 3 LCUs.
> 
> ?????Anyway I would ask TCS staff in Paranal to perform this check.
> 
> ?????Hope this helps...
> 
> ?????Cheers,
> ?????Pietro
> 
> ?????PS:
> ?????- I would exclude any M2 motion
> ?????- of course if the stars in the IA boxes are drifting the IA will be poor and AO corrections ?will be bad
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Software 
> ?????Modified By: smieske 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 12:59:04 
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Software 
> ?????Modified By: smieske 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 12:59:04 
> ??03/28/12 13:58:04 ????ikastine
> ?????wtvst vstmgr:~ 1001 > msgSend ltvalt alttrkServer GETTERM ""
> ?????MESSAGEBUFFER:
> ?????ACEC: 0.000000,*ACES: 1.440000,*AN: -6.710000,*AW: -43.660000,*CA: 46.690000,ECEC: 0.000000,ECES: 0.000000,*IA: -250.220000,*IE: -359.340000,*NPAE: -0.190000,NRX: 0.000000,NRY: 0.000000,*TF: -37.500000,*TX: -3.190000
> 
> ?????MESSAGEBUFFER:
> ?????ACEC: 0.000000,*ACES: 1.440000,*AN: -6.710000,*AW: -43.660000,*CA: 46.690000,ECEC: 0.000000,ECES: 0.000000,*IA: -250.220000,*IE: -359.340000,*NPAE: -0.190000,NRX: 0.000000,NRY: 0.000000,*TF: -37.500000,*TX: -3.190000
> ?????wtvst vstmgr:~ 1003 > 
> 
> ?????wtvst vstmgr:~ 1003 > msgSend ltvadc rottrkServer GETTERM ""
> ?????MESSAGEBUFFER:
> ?????ACEC: 0.000000,*ACES: 1.440000,*AN: -6.710000,*AW: -43.660000,*CA: 46.690000,ECEC: 0.000000,ECES: 0.000000,*IA: -250.220000,*IE: -359.340000,*NPAE: -0.190000,NRX: 0.000000,NRY: 0.000000,*TF: -37.500000,*TX: -3.190000
> 
> 
> ?????Terms with "*" before them means that they are currently used by tracking. This means that axes are using same pointing model, so no problem in this side.
> ?????Note: as this IQ degration was reported after probe SW/HW was taken from simulation, we put back it simualtion (after talking with Sergio) if this make some difference tonight. 
> ?????Assignee changed: smieske 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: ikastine 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 13:58:04 
> ?????Assignee changed: smieske 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: ikastine 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 13:58:04 
> ??03/28/12 20:22:37 ????rparra
> ?????Tracking checked on daytime. Position error curves (az, alt, rot) during tracking ?don't differ from the ones measured previously.
> ?????In order to try to come back to the conditions before March 22nd and trying to discard possible failure factors, I disconnected the pickup mirror cable, in addition to the action of putting it on simulation.
> ??03/29/12 09:25:53 ????vst
> ?????2012-03-29
> 
> ?????Tonight i had degradation, here is some of them:
> 
> 
> ?????2012-03-29T07:37:47 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????1.06", 4 ?1.18", 6 ?1.12", 7 ?1.44",12 ????0 ???1.18" ?-- ?????8.9 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T07:39:14 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????1.06", 4 ?1.14", 3 ?1.17", 7 ?1.37",12 ????0 ???1.18" 1.18" ???4.3 ?6.6 ???6.6 ?7.3 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.18 ?6.6 ?7.3 ?OT=1.19
> ?????2012-03-29T07:41:17 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????1.04", 5 ?1.04", 4 ?1.04", 5 ?1.28",12 ????0 ???1.11" ?-- ????12.1 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T07:42:45 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????0.99", 4 ?1.05", 4 ?1.02", 5 ?1.31",14 ????0 ???1.09" 1.10" ??10.9 11.5 ???7.0 ?7.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.14 ?9.0 ?7.4 ?OT=1.11
> ?????2012-03-29T07:44:46 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 5 ?0.82", 4 ?0.85", 4 ?1.31",18 ????0 ???0.96" ?-- ????24.4 ??- ????7.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T07:46:15 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.81", 5 ?0.82", 4 ?0.90", 6 ?1.32",16 ????1 ???0.96" 0.96" ??19.6 22.0 ???8.3 ?7.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.08 ?13.4 ?7.5 ?OT=0.97
> ?????2012-03-29T07:48:11 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87", 6 ?0.80", 3 ?0.83", 5 ?1.35",17 ????1 ???0.97" ?-- ????31.8 ??- ????8.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> ?????2012-03-29T07:49:37 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.86", 6 ?0.75", 4 ?0.79", 5 ?1.52",24 ????2 ???0.96" 0.96" ??41.8 36.8 ???9.9 ?9.2 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.05 ?19.2 ?8.0 ?OT=0.97
> ?????2012-03-29T07:56:32 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.95", 5 ?0.87", 5 ?0.88", 4 ?1.26",15 ????1 ???1.00" ?-- ????27.1 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> ?????2012-03-29T07:58:02 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 5 ?0.83", 5 ?0.82", 5 ?1.22",17 ????1 ???0.95" 0.97" ??25.5 26.3 ???8.3 ?8.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?20.6 ?8.0 ?OT=0.98
> ?????2012-03-29T08:00:09 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????0.90", 5 ?0.93", 4 ?0.95", 4 ?1.32",17 ????0 ???1.03" ?-- ????16.3 ??- ????7.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:01:34 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????1.10", 6 ?1.08", 4 ?1.07", 4 ?1.40",15 ????0 ???1.14" 1.08" ??13.2 14.7 ???7.1 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?19.6 ?7.9 ?OT=1.09
> ?????2012-03-29T08:03:42 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.94", 7 ?0.95", 4 ?0.94", 5 ?1.23",13 ????0 ???1.01" ?-- ????13.0 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:05:08 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.93", 5 ?0.95", 4 ?0.94", 6 ?1.29",13 ????0 ???1.02" 1.02" ??16.7 14.8 ???7.9 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?19.0 ?7.8 ?OT=1.02
> ?????2012-03-29T08:07:17 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.98", 9 ?0.91", 5 ?0.91", 3 ?1.23",15 ????0 ???0.99" ?-- ????16.5 ??- ????8.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:08:46 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.85", 8 ?0.92", 6 ?0.88", 6 ?1.13",13 ????0 ???0.93" 0.96" ???8.9 12.7 ???9.0 ?8.7 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.03 ?18.2 ?7.9 ?OT=0.96
> ?????2012-03-29T08:14:48 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????1.02", 7 ?1.09", 5 ?1.02", 6 ?1.22", 7 ????0 ???1.09" ?-- ?????7.2 ??- ????6.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:16:14 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????0.94", 7 ?0.96", 4 ?0.97", 6 ?1.32",16 ????0 ???1.04" 1.06" ??12.9 10.0 ???7.7 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.03 ?17.3 ?7.8 ?OT=1.07
> ?????2012-03-29T08:18:19 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????1.02", 4 ?0.99", 4 ?1.01", 4 ?1.23",11 ????0 ???1.06" ?-- ????10.0 ??- ????6.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:19:48 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????1.01", 5 ?1.03", 4 ?0.99", 3 ?1.24",12 ????0 ???1.06" 1.06" ???9.3 ?9.6 ???5.5 ?6.0 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?16.5 ?7.6 ?OT=1.06
> ?????2012-03-29T08:21:59 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????0.98", 6 ?1.02", 5 ?0.99", 3 ?1.16", 9 ????0 ???1.02" ?-- ?????4.4 ??- ????5.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:23:24 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????1.06", 4 ?1.03", 5 ?1.00", 6 ?1.17", 8 ????0 ???1.05" 1.04" ???6.7 ?5.6 ???5.8 ?5.7 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?15.5 ?7.5 ?OT=1.04
> ?????2012-03-29T08:25:34 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????1.08", 6 ?1.11", 5 ?1.04", 4 ?1.19",12 ????0 ???1.09" ?-- ?????4.5 ??- ????6.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:27:02 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????0.99", 6 ?1.07", 3 ?1.02", 5 ?1.16", 8 ????0 ???1.06" 1.08" ???1.8 ?3.2 ???5.6 ?5.8 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?14.5 ?7.3 ?OT=1.08
> ?????2012-03-29T08:29:13 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????1.05", 7 ?1.16", 4 ?1.05", 4 ?1.19", 8 ????0 ???1.10" ?-- ?????2.3 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:30:42 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????1.11", 5 ?1.19", 5 ?1.11", 4 ?1.17", 7 ????0 ???1.14" 1.12" ???2.1 ?2.2 ???6.0 ?6.0 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.05 ?13.5 ?7.2 ?OT=1.12
> ?????2012-03-29T08:32:53 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????1.11", 6 ?1.17", 5 ?1.14", 4 ?1.29", 7 ????0 ???1.16" ?-- ?????2.0 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:34:19 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????1.26", 4 ?1.25", 5 ?1.25", 6 ?1.36", 5 ????0 ???1.27" 1.21" ???3.4 ?2.7 ???5.3 ?5.6 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.06 ?12.8 ?7.1 ?OT=1.22
> ?????2012-03-29T08:36:26 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????1.09", 5 ?1.10", 5 ?1.12", 9 ?1.22", 5 ????0 ???1.15" ?-- ?????6.1 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:37:52 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????1.20", 6 ?1.23", 6 ?1.23", 6 ?1.35", 6 ????0 ???1.25" 1.20" ???4.2 ?5.2 ???6.5 ?6.8 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.07 ?12.3 ?7.1 ?OT=1.20
> ?????2012-03-29T08:40:32 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????1.24", 5 ?1.26", 6 ?1.17", 5 ?1.28", 6 ????0 ???1.21" ?-- ?????2.8 ??- ????6.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:42:01 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????1.10", 3 ?1.17", 7 ?1.17", 7 ?1.33", 8 ????0 ???1.18" 1.19" ???2.5 ?2.6 ???6.9 ?6.5 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.08 ?11.7 ?7.0 ?OT=1.20
> ?????2012-03-29T08:44:07 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????1.16", 5 ?1.14", 4 ?1.14", 4 ?1.32",10 ????0 ???1.18" ?-- ?????5.6 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:45:34 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????1.12", 4 ?1.12", 4 ?1.10", 4 ?1.28", 8 ????0 ???1.16" 1.17" ???7.2 ?6.4 ???5.2 ?5.5 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.08 ?11.3 ?6.9 ?OT=1.17
> 
> ?????I also took some plots to the rotators velocity in this position and there are in vstmgr/rotatorplot.samp and vstmgr/dummy.txt
> 
> ?????But checking the behavior of these OBs the degradation its kind of random, in the sense that with AO sometimes had this problem sometimes not, and without AO same thing, also these programs are executed very close to the meridian ( half an hour after until one hour) and low airmass, but the IQ degradation get better with a higher airmass than 1.2, and i do remember that the image quality of the VST and the focus had some problems or lets say was not very good in this positions during the commissioning even after the intervention. and the magnitud of the problem was different if you use a differents filters, maybe this is the problem. So i think that a good test could be try to executed this programs below airmass 1.2 or from airmass 1.2 abnd also do the AO correction more often, now is after 5 Obs or more, maybe it will better after 3 Obs.
> 
> ?????Regards
> 
> ?????CRR
> ??03/29/12 19:15:59 ????vst
> ?????Only some defocussed corners of the field of view were showing
> ?????astigmatism (elipses pointing to the center of the field of view).
> 
> ?????- first I found that the relative filter offsets on locics1 were all
> ???????at 0 but the filter offsets are read from wocins (can't cause
> ???????problems)
> 
> ?????- I can exclude that the M1 shape (high oder aberration) can cause the
> ?????problem.
> 
> ?????- I exclude rotation.
> 
> ?????- It can be tilt in M1 or M2:
> 
> ???????- M2 tilt configuration parameters were checked (214.56,-369.90).
> 
> ???????- there was a M2 error reported in PPRS-044431. The image quality
> ???????degradation coinsidently started at the same time (about on 
> ???????March 22 UT 01h)
> 
> 
> ?????=> I'd strongly suggest to investigate M2 PMAC, positions,... 
> ?????reboot (initialize) M2 unit after M2 error (possibly steps were
> ?????lost).
> 
> ?????Thomas Szeifert
> 
> ?????Assignee changed: rparra 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Electronic 
> ?????Modified By: vst 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-29 19:15:59 
> ?????Assignee changed: rparra 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Electronic 
> ?????Modified By: vst 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-29 19:15:59 
> ??03/29/12 20:06:54 ????vst
> ?????M2 problems of last week discarded - the M2 was rebooted yesterday according to Ricardo Parra. TSz
> ??03/30/12 02:59:29 ????vst
> ?????The pointing was 35 arcseconds (far away) from the expected position - according to the IA stars. At alt 66, azim. 121 Actual Rotator 56 - same size of offset in another field found later. (no automatic AG star acquisition should be used).
> 
> ?????Images quality gradients observed relatively quickly after the IA - in open loop observations. We closed the loop when the IQ degradation over the field was permanently > 10%. Required to keep a look in due time on the QC logs.
> 
> ?????TSz
> 
> 
> 
> ??03/30/12 11:42:10 ????rparra
> ?????Just a comment: In fact I didn't reboot the M2 yet, waiting for instructions from INAF on the right way to do it. There is some risk on doing the wrong way.
> ?????Now I got the answer from Pietro and would proceed accordingly.
> ??03/30/12 20:39:37 ????rparra
> ?????After R. Huerta made a backup of HCU, both, HCU and ltvm12 have been rebooted and initialized today. 
> ?????If some of their parameters were corrupted causing a mirror to be wrongly tilted, this should restore parameters to their original values.
> ??03/31/12 02:42:41 ????vst
> ?????Steffen found that the PSF anisotropy plots look far worse then in the past.
> 
> ?????I still believe in a focal plane tilt. The last item what 
> ?????was not checked is the tilt of M1 which was put as far as I remember at the start of the efforts to correct the
> ?????focal plane tilt of the telescope.
> 
> ?????Could there be something lost after the VLT-SW 2010 tests about 3 weeks ago?
> ??03/31/12 03:19:30 ????vst
> ?????Pointing offset is about 23" tonight. (110-120 pixel), almost as large as yesterday. Therefore, automatic IA/GS selection cannot be done. Such a systematic offset seems consistent with the hypothesis of a small tilt....
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/31/12 03:29:57 ????vst
> ?????Final note for today: the 'tilt' effect is strong around the meridian, and weaker at higher airmass. This has always been the case qualitatively, but is more pronounced now. I will send around a few anisotropy plots.
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/31/12 16:29:20 ????vst
> ?????PPRS 44590 created for night March 30/31 for another 01:40 loss due to degradation. That loss is logged in the PPRS 44590.
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/31/12 16:37:26 ????vst
> ?????I add the 01:20 (corrected) downtime of PPRS 44590 here, and put 0 downtime to PPRS 44590
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/31/12 16:52:48 ????rparra
> ?????Today, according to Pietro's suggestion, ALT, AZ and ROT lcu's were rebooted, initialized and Pointing model applied.
> ?????Main mirror fixed points positions have been checked and found OK.
> ?????Probe has been connected back and ?enabled in order to allow the test suggested by Pietro : "I would check the pointing model presetting a star and putting the probe in the center of the field. If presetting several stars, the pointing is visually very bad or even you cannot see the stars in the TCCD window, there is definitely something wrong".
> ??04/01/12 03:52:11 ????vst
> ?????I have checked the pointing offset on the telescope AG - it was as well at >30 arcsecs offset.
> 
> ?????reference pixel x,y: 197, 181
> 
> ?????at alt 56deg az 132deg rot ?42 deg:	AG offsets -29, 2 ??M2 offset delta, eps -40, 50
> ?????at alt 60deg az ?28deg rot 138 deg:	AG offsets ?14,18 ??M2 offset delta, eps -10, 50
> ?????at alt 44deg az ?85deg rot ?74 deg:	AG offsets -19,14 ??M2 offset delta, eps -25, 40
> 
> ?????Then I did a focus sequence at two rotator angles:
> 
> ?????-rw-rw-r-- ?1 archeso vlt 576567360 Apr ?1 01:09 OMEGACAM_IMG_OBS092_0001.fits
> ?????-rw-rw-r-- ?1 archeso vlt 576570240 Apr ?1 01:11 OMEGACAM_IMG_FOCUS092_0001.fits
> ?????-rw-rw-r-- ?1 archeso vlt 576567360 Apr ?1 01:19 OMEGACAM_IMG_OBS092_0003.fits
> ?????-rw-rw-r-- ?1 archeso vlt 576570240 Apr ?1 01:22 OMEGACAM_IMG_FOCUS092_0003.fits
> 
> ?????The psf anisotropy shows that the degradation rotates on the images. It's locked with the telescope.
> 
> ?????I have decided to check the image quality at the M2 tilt angle as indicated by the pointing
> ?????offset (~-25 arcsec in delta and 47 arcsec in epsilon)
> 
> ?????The focus sequence is unfotunately useless - too much out of focus.
> 
> ?????We (with Steffen) have anyway checked the PSF anisotropy and found the PSF very much improved with the
> ?????change M2 tilt angles delta and epsilon.
> 
> ?????I have change the M2 tilt on the M2 configuration GUI from (214.56, -369.90) to (189.56, -324.90)
> ?????and we continued with this configuration for the night, with a critical eye on the data.
> 
> ?????Tilt of M2 improves the problem (even though it can be as well M1 or OMEGACAM which is tilted)
> ?????Unlikely that OMEGACAM is tilted - nobody touched it. M2 has had an error/problem a week ago!!!
> 
> ?????Thomas Szeifert
> ??04/01/12 11:56:23 ????rparra
> ?????With all this additional information the ticket is reassigned to Optics.
> 
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Optical 
> ?????Modified By: rparra 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-04-01 11:56:23 
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Optical 
> ?????Modified By: rparra 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-04-01 11:56:23 
> ??04/02/12 12:10:52 ????rparra
> ?????I add here comments from Pietro Schipani:
> 
> ?????1) We should really be sure of when exactly this problem has started, to find out what has happened immediately before.
> ?????The earthquake happened on 19/3. No problem was signaled immediately after: we are assuming the problems started on 22/3. If the problem has been really the new INIT of M2 after the leg#3 failure, we should see a difference in the images during the 21/3 night, before and after the INIT time of the hexapod. Did somebody check it? I would start from the images (please remember I cannot access them, somebody should carefully check).
> 
> 
> ?????2) Hexapod legs errors: it had already happened very sporadically, not necessarily on leg#3. I think it is a following error > threshold for a given leg (that can be real, or "apparent" i.e. due to a wrong instantaneous reading of the encoder: we had this problem before commissioning and applied a patch to the PLC PMAC code to discard wrong values; but maybe sometimes that patch is not enough).
> ?????The recovering procedure is to execute again M2 INIT - ONLINE from the M2 panel.
> ?????I think the error occurred is not significant in the context of our discussion. If the new INIT has produced a new zero position for the M2 because something (a switch used in the INIT?) had moved in the meantime because of the earthquake (that is very unlikely, but we are doing brainstorming), the problem could have been the new INIT. But first we should demonstrate it (see previous item).
> 
> 
> ?????3) If the M2 "zero" position is now different, we should have an approximately constant offset in the telescope pointing. This might be revealed building a new pointing model and analyzing carefully the data. If you send me the pointing model output (including the error file) I am available to cross-check from here.
> ?????If you do it, before starting the procedure from the pomStart gui, please remember to compute the "center of rotation" pixel (we do it usually offsetting the rotator by 180? and computing the middle point between initial and final pixels) and overwrite the "reference pixel" value in the DB for the duration of the pointing model procedure. It is in the table:
> 
> ?????@wtvst:Appl_data:TCS:msw:insData.data( )
> 
> ?????and should be (196,178).
> ?????Afterward, restore the old value for the reference pixel (that is the pixel where the guide star has to be in order to maximize the illumination of the Shack-Hartmann too; close to the center of rotation but not perfectly coincident).
> 
> ?????As large pointing errors have been reported, I would build a new pointing model at least to compare it with the current one.
> 
> 
> ?????4) The TIOs have also talked about drifting stars:
> 
> ?????"2012-03-27 07:01:53 ??vst
> ??????????Hi,
> ??????????During the execution of OBID 607044. The AO stars were selected by hand and they were center OK. But during exposure #2 they started to drift.
> ??????????So Coma increased a lot and guiding was lost."
> 
> ?????"2012-03-28 03:12:38 ??vst
> ?????While the observation was running I could clearly see that the IA stars in the patch started to drift ending at a very corner of the square patch.
> ??????????As a result of this images on science rtd were elongated most of the time."
> 
> ?????Of course, also these things have produced a bad image quality and this looks a different problem.
> 
> ?????If autoguiding was active (I do not know) this behaviour is not normal, even though the M2 would be in another place. If it was not active, in those cases we could conclude this was not the right choice.
> ?????Please consider I do not know how the OBs were built and cannot be sure. 
> ?????I would just suggest to check how the telescope was operated and/or if autoguiding works well for all the allowed star magnitudes.
> 
> ?????In my experience with TCS autoguiding, the guide was poor with bad autoguiding control parameters (PII autoguiding controller) or because of stars too faint (depending on the combination magnitude/integration time).
> ?????I do not know how these parameters are taken into account on camera AG, so there I cannot help.
> 
> 
> ?????5) I have read the M2 was tilted and then the IQ looked to be better.
> ?????It would be fine, but there are several warnings (more specifically, there is a lot of work to do, if the alignment is changed!).
> 
> ?????5.1) ?We would change the alignment of the telescope; new tests should assess the off-axis astigmatism gets better, approximately as it should be from theory (now it should be worse, if we are suddenly in misalignment condition, although we do not know why).
> ?????We did many tests measuring the astigmatism with the Shack-Hartmann at 40 arcminutes from the center in four 90deg spaced positions (up-down-left-right) and then we post-processed the data. I can help you with the procedure.
> ??????Another parallel test is just to look at the images, but so far this can be just a qualitative analysis and gives us no numbers.
> ?????5.2) The delta,epsilon values in the M2 panel are the rotation angles of M2 around the axes of its reference system, in arcsecs; they have nothing to do with the pointing offsets in arcsecs on the focal plane
> ?????5.3) Changing the initial position of M2, the ONECAL table for coma shall be updated
> ?????5.4) Changing the initial position of M2, the pointing model shall be updated
> 
> ?????It is much work. I would suggest you to do all of this, only if you are definitely sure that the problem is solved realigning the M2. Maybe 5.1 can help to decide.
> 
> ?????Generally speaking, I cannot verify your assumptions; anyway maybe I can help you further to repeat analysis done during commissioning.
> 
> ??04/02/12 22:46:20 ????vst
> ?????I'd like to add that the bad observations with PSFs degraded in the corners were done in any combination of open and closed loop wave front sensing and auto guiding. The pointing model was very bad (40 arcsecs) in any position of the sky.
> 
> ?????Sure - the telescope was misaligned and the M2 tilt should be measured with the IA (SH sensor) over the full field of view. There is no established procedure (like for UTs). 
> 
> ?????I'm appologizing for the fast hack of the M2 configuration, but with the M2 error 10 days ago and the pointing offset and the tilt of the focal plane, I have had a very good indication in which direction to move and no alternative on the short term either. Still I don't know what has changed physically.
> 
> ?????Mind that the parameters are not archived. Thomas Szeifert
> ??04/03/12 03:28:50 ????vst
> ?????For the record:
> 
> ?????Tonight Thomas made a few checks on the telescope, and then we started an observation with the original M2 tilts. One could immediately appreciate the pointing offset, and we got 15-20% IQ variatino. When correcting the M2 parameters to the tilt values found 2 days ago, the pointing got accurate and IQ variation decreased below 10%.
> 
> ?????Steffen
> ??04/09/12 18:37:02 ????tszeifer
> ?????VST Image quality problems since about March 22, 2012
> ?????-----------------------------------------------------
> 
> ?????We have received reports about strong image degradation at the VST with
> ?????OMEGACAM (PPRS 44520 issued on March 26). The FWHM degrade toward one or
> ?????two corners. 	see OMEGACAM_IMG_OBS091_0062.psfanisotropy.png
> 
> ?????There was as well a degradation of the pointing model at the same time,
> ?????such that I have started to ivestigate based on the working hypotesis
> ?????that one of the two mirrors may be tilted. 
> 
> ?????Pointing offsets:
> ?????-----------------
> 
> ?????	to center the AG on the patch of the SH sensor I have to send
> ?????	either an AG offset (see below) or an M2 tiltpos around
> ?????	the coma free point:
> 
> ?????					AG offset	M2 tiltpos
> ?????	at alt 56deg az 132deg rot 42: ?-29,2.1		-40, 50arcsec
> ?????	???	60deg 	28 ?	138	14,18.4	-10, 50
> ?????		44deg	85deg	74deg	-19,14		-25, 40	
> 
> 
> ?????First correction of M2 in a rush 
> ?????--------------------------------
> ?????	(all images were badly distorted until then)
> ?????	OMEGACAM_IMG_OBS091_0062.psfanisotropy.png
> 
> ?????	I have then corrected a tiltpos at the M2 configuration panel
> ?????	of -25 and 47 arcsecs:
> 
> ?????	??????old value:	new value:
> ?????	X ?????4.350		4.350
> ?????	Y ?????0.5342		0.5342		
> ?????	Z ?????0.700		0.700
> ?????	delta ?214.56		189.56
> ?????	eps ???-369.90		-322.90		
> 
> ?????	This is an absolute rotation of M2 (not around the coma free point)
> ?????	but I presume that the image analyzes would correct the coma
> ?????	introduced by this change (small angle).'
> 
> 
> ?????Pointing models:
> ?????----------------
> 
> ?????tszeifer at pc015434$ more 2011-07-30_VSTv_CA_2-model.dat 
> ?????VLT VSTv CA pointing error file
> ?????T ??48 ??1.2194 ??43.019 ?-0.0479
> ???????IA ??????+247.0246 ????2.47123
> ???????IE ??????+338.4534 ???14.21910
> ???????CA ???????-43.0515 ????4.06020
> ???????AN ????????+6.3089 ????0.24021
> ???????AW ???????+40.7186 ????0.20165
> ???????NPAE ??????+0.4503 ????3.53862
> ???????TF ???????+35.8879 ????2.60760
> ???????ECES ?????+18.7656 ???13.47056
> ???????ACES ??????-1.3801 ????0.43242
> ???????TX ????????-2.9534 ????3.75066
> 
> ?????The following pointing model was taken after the reference pixel was
> ?????changed to the center of rotation (which is far off the SH patch which
> ?????is the usual reference).
> 
> ?????tszeifer at pc015434$ more 2012-04-05_UTv_CA_3-model.dat ?
> ?????VLT UTv CA pointing error file
> ?????T ??40 ??1.8934 ??42.002 ?-0.0484
> ??????=IE ??????+350.8897
> ??????=IA ??????+251.4713
> ??????=CA ???????-77.7675
> ??????=AN ????????+8.0035
> ??????=AW ???????+41.9898
> ??????=NPAE ??????+1.1769
> ??????=TX ????????+3.2583
> ??????=TF ???????+39.4159
> ??????=ACES ??????+0.6101
> 
> ?????IE index error in elevation	(+12 arcsecs)
> ?????IA index error in azimuth	(+4 arcsec)
> ?????CA nonperpendicularity of elevation and pointing axes	(-34 arcsecs!)
> 
> 
> ?????reference pixels:
> ?????-----------------
> ?????	on AG TCCD of VST:
> 
> ?????	center of SH sensor:	196, 178
> ?????	center of rotation:	252, 181
> 
> ?????	?
> ?????measurement of the off-axes aberrations with the VST SH sensor:
> ?????---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ??????- the field dependent astigmatism correction was enabled
> ??????- I have switched off the M1 M2 corrections
> ??????- I did combined offsets (offsets TCS main are not considered by the
> ????????probe absolute position setup)
> ??????- 3 measurements averaged to one value
> 
> ?????The mirrors were corrected before, but the setup of the measurements took
> ?????a while and I was appearently off the best M1,M2 position when I started
> ?????the sequence:
> 
> ????????		?f	??coma		astigm		absrot
> ?????		?----	??----------	---------
> ?????+2400" North	?1263	??501 -109deg	297 ??86deg	-172deg
> ?????0 ?????		?449	??467 ??15deg	280 ?112deg	
> ?????-2400" South	?1367	??726 ??48deg	197 ?120deg	-166deg
> ?????+2400" East	?1633	??571 ?-22deg	191 ?142deg	-163deg
> ?????-2400" West	?1371	??385 ?126deg	167 -153deg	-156deg
> ?????0 ?????		?564	??330 ??17deg ?226 ?104deg	-154deg
> 
> ?????mean astigmatism corrected:
> ?????---------------------------
> ?????(I would need some time to think if the following calculation makes sense.)
> 
> ?????		original	corrected central value	focus offset
> ?????	Z5 (2cos) Z6 (2sin)	Z5 (cos) Z6 sin	
> ?????+2400N	?42 	-294		242	-144		756
> ?????-2400S	-98 ???-171		102	?-21		860
> ?????+2400E	?46	-185		246	?-35		1127
> ?????-2400W	?98	135		298	??98		865
> ?????0	-201	-195		-1	?-45		-57
> ?????0	-200	-106	?????????0	??44		58
> 
> ?????	-> the two values in the center of the field of view indicate
> ?????	about a cos/sin(2alpha) term of -200, 	-150
> 
> 
> 
> ?????Focus (defocus) sequences:
> ?????--------------------------
> 
> ?????	March 31/April 1:
> 
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0001	old config	0deg rotator
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0003	old config	about += 50 deg rotation
> 
> 
> ?????	April 3/4:
> ?????	
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0001	new config	126deg rotator
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0002	new config	-139deg (no ao)
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0003	new config	139deg (after ao)
> 
> ?????	donuts:
> ?????	-------
> 
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0004	new config	-125deg rotator
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0005	new config	150deg (no ao)
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0006	new config	156deg (after ao)
> ?????	
> ?????	
> 
> ?????	April 4/5:
> 
> ?????	new configuration (but with some decenter of M2 according to
> ?????	the tiltpos of -25, 47 converted to M2 motion around the coma
> ?????	free point.
> 
> ?????	Two files with 0 and 90 rotation on sky.	
> 
> ?????	
> ?????comments received from Pietro Schippani:
> 
> ?????Dear Thomas / Steffen / all,
> 
> ?????thanks a lot.
> 
> ?????Thus, apparently the night of leg#3 error something has happened. Maybe something had already happened (the earthquake of 19/3?) and we could see the effects only after the next M2 INIT.
> ?????I think we should still check the last images immediately before and the first immediately after the leg error. This should confirm that the problems started after the leg#3 error and new INIT of the hexapod.
> 
> ?????Your results seems to be consistent, because a change in CA term should mean a left-right displacement, which should be produced by a tilt of M2 around Y-axis (eps).
> 
> ?????The average tilt you are applying to move the star closer to the previous position is indeed larger around Y:
> ?????delta=-25, eps=47
> 
> ?????I also looked at your astigmatism measures. I attach a Matlab script with some self-explaining comments:
> ?????- I added the field astigmatism (because in 1st version of my report I missed to write their subtraction should have been disabled)
> ?????- I removed the rather large astigmatism measured in the center of the field (average of 2 measures)
> ?????- I fit the results to M2 TILTPOS angles
> 
> ?????The results of the fit are delta=-29, eps=12, but I would not trust them ?(I am not 100% sure about the signs, about the positions in which the SH was, the starting wavefront error was significant, and there is measurement noise).
> 
> ?????If you are reasonably satisfied with the new M2 position that you have found experimentally, maybe the quickest way is that you start from there, try to improve it slightly if possible (I would use the procedure described in my document, taking also images with the camera for a visual cross-check), and then you build a new pointing model and verify if the ONECAL table for coma is still as good as it was before (I would say the 1st measure of coma after ONECAL should never be much larger than 1000nm).
> 
> ?????Indeed, I would benefit from this problem to remove the TILTPOS movement in the ONECAL (see warning no.4, last section of my document). Filling with all zeros the table in the db (see warning no.4) , that movement will end immediately, saving a (little) time, and the interpretation of M2 position after ONECAL will be easier.
> 
> ?????Cheers,
> ?????Pietro
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ?????Comments from Steffen Mieske:
> 
> ?????Hi,
> 
> ?????so I checked the images taken directly before and after the failure. Last image before the failure was taken in the night before.
> 
> ?????last image before M2 failure:
> ?????OMEGA.2012-03-21T09:11:18.177.fits and images before: 40-50 pixel pointing error
> 
> ?????first image after M2 failure:
> ?????OMEGA.2012-03-22T01:37:50.229.fits and images after: ~220-230 pixel pointing error
> 
> ?????This narrows down the event more, I guess there is not much doubt that it must have been the M2 failure.
> 
> ?????Best regards,
> ?????Steffen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ?????CONCLUSION:
> 
> ?????The problem was traced down to a mechanical change of the M2 position either:
> 
> ???????- the problem occured during the failure of M2 in PPRS 44431 on March 21/22
> 
> ??????- or the problem was detected after the init fiollowing the M2 failure on March 21/22
> 
> ????????-> which could have been originated by an earthqquake (reported by various people a few days before the image degradation).
> 
> 
> ?????It is very alarming! There is no recovery procedure for this case! (You need some kind of a standby LAN Chile ticket for telescope scientists or opticians in case of >~xx m/s**2 earthquake if this is true).
> 
> ?????Pending action:
> 
> ??????- new pointing model (with M2 at new position PPRS 44652 but for the reference pixel set to center of rotatioon - to be correct for OMEGACAM and not the SH sensor).
> ??04/10/12 13:38:05 ????tszeifer
> ?????The earthquake was only 3cm/s**2 (classified no risk):
> 
> ?????http://odyssey5.pl.eso.org/paranal/engineering/earthquake/2012-03-19-21-52-22.htm
> ??04/22/12 14:01:22 ????sguisard
> ?????Status Changed: On Hold 
> ?????Modified By: sguisard 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-04-22 14:01:22 
> ?????Status Changed: On Hold 
> ?????Modified By: sguisard 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-04-22 14:01:22 
> ??05/12/12 15:42:46 ????vst
> ?????We did a pointing model with the old and new M2 configuration paramters:
> 
> ?????old M2 position:
> 
> ?????tszeifer at pc015434$ more 2012-04-05_UTv_CA_3-model.dat ?
> ?????VLT UTv CA pointing error file
> ?????T ??40 ??1.8934 ??42.002 ?-0.0484
> ??????=IE ??????+350.8897
> ??????=IA ??????+251.4713
> ??????=CA ???????-77.7675
> ??????=AN ????????+8.0035
> ??????=AW ???????+41.9898
> ??????=NPAE ??????+1.1769
> ??????=TX ????????+3.2583
> ??????=TF ???????+39.4159
> ??????=ACES ??????+0.6101
> 
> ?????new M2 position:
> 
> ?????Pointing model on 40 stars, the result is:
> 
> ????????????coeff ??????change ????value ???sigma
> 
> ???????1 ????IA ????????+0.000 ??+262.67 ???5.463
> ???????2 ????IE ????????+0.000 ??+363.87 ???1.104
> ???????3 ????CA ????????-0.000 ???-50.87 ??10.956
> ???????4 ????AN ????????-0.000 ????+8.14 ???0.375
> ???????5 ????AW ????????-0.000 ???+43.27 ???0.304
> ???????6 ????NPAE ??????+0.000 ???+21.43 ???9.892
> ???????7 ????TF ????????+0.000 ???+30.08 ???8.071
> ???????8 ????TX ????????-0.000 ????+9.79 ???5.039
> ???????9 ????ACES ??????-0.000 ????-1.25 ???0.921
> 
> ?????Sky RMS = ??1.51
> ?????Popn SD = ??1.79
> 
> 
> ?????The pointing model was needed due to the modified M2 zero points as already discussed above:
> 
> ?????	??????old value:	new value:
> ?????	X ?????4.350		4.350
> ?????	Y ?????0.5342		0.5342		
> ?????	Z ?????0.700		0.700
> ?????	delta ?214.56		189.56
> ?????	eps ???-369.90		-322.90		
> ??04/03/14 12:49:07 ????phaguena
> ?????Assignee changed: tszeifer 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: phaguena 
> ?????Modified Date: 2014-04-03 12:49:07 
> ?????Assignee changed: tszeifer 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: phaguena 
> ?????Modified Date: 2014-04-03 12:49:07 
> ??05/12/14 00:15:07 ????tszeifer
> ?????!!!MASTER TICKET!!!
> ??08/11/14 22:05:11 ????tszeifer
> ?????Status Changed: Assigned 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 2014-08-11 22:05:11 
> ?????Status Changed: Assigned 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 2014-08-11 22:05:11 
> ??05/05/15 21:15:14 ????tszeifer
> ?????M2 hexapod is more stable now. M2 tilt is corrected by the OMEGACAM IA. I put this on hold for the time being. In theory it should not happen anymore.
> 
> ?????Status Changed: On Hold 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 2015-05-05 21:15:13 
> ?????Status Changed: On Hold 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 2015-05-05 21:15:13 
> ??08/01/15 20:29:30 ????tszeifer
> ?????From my point of view it can be closed now, TSz
> 
> ?????Assignee changed: rhuerta 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Electronic 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 08/01/15 20:29:30 
> ?????Assignee changed: rhuerta 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Electronic 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 08/01/15 20:29:30 
> ??08/03/15 23:02:24 ????rhuerta
> ?????Having in mind that the M2 positioning is stable now (position after INIT) and Thomas' suggestion I will close this ticket.
> ?????More details on the technical aspects of the M2 problems are in ticket 47488.
> ?????RHU
> 
> ?????Status Changed: Closed 
> ?????Modified By: rhuerta 
> ?????Modified Date: 08/03/15 23:02:24 
> ?????Status Changed: Closed 
> ?????Modified By: rhuerta 
> ?????Modified Date: 08/03/15 23:02:24 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 140245 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.astro-wise.org/pipermail/comm2011/attachments/20150805/aa788e7c/attachment-0001.bin>

From kuijken at strw.leidenuniv.nl  Wed Aug  5 20:34:50 2015
From: kuijken at strw.leidenuniv.nl (Konrad Kuijken)
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:34:50 +0200
Subject: [Comm2011] Fwd: PPRS-044520-Updated-VST-OPTICS & SUPPORT-IQ
	degradation on VST/OmegaCAM - !!! MASTER TICKET !!!-Electronic
Message-ID: <12E643E0-26D1-48A4-A0F3-E905D9E95B6F@strw.leidenuniv.nl>



Begin forwarded message:

> From: Paranal_AREmail <esoarspl at eso.org>
> Subject: PPRS-044520-Updated-VST-OPTICS & SUPPORT-IQ degradation on VST/OmegaCAM - !!! MASTER TICKET !!!-Electronic
> Date: August 1, 2015 22:31:16 CEST
> To: kuijken at strw.leidenuniv.nl
> Reply-To: Paranal_AREmail <esoarspl at eso.org>
> 
> Problem number PPRS-044520 in the Paranal PRS has now been updated.
> The new details of the ticket are listed below.
> This is for your information only.
> 
> 
> Problem Number ?: PPRS-044520
> 
> Creation Date ??: 03/26/12 08:25:24 ?by Carlos La Fuente ?(clafuent at eso.org)
> Type ???????????: Problem
> Keywords ???????: IQ degradation on VST/OmegaCAM - !!! MASTER TICKET !!!
> Priority ???????: Critical
> Deadline ???????: 
> Status ?????????: On Hold
> 
> ----- ?Minor Change Section ---------------------
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> 
> Location ????????????: VST
> Area/Instrument Type : TELESCOPE
> System/Instrument ???: OPTICS & SUPPORT
> Sub-system ??????????: 
> 
> Assigned to Group ???: Electronic
> Assigned to Person ??: rhuerta
> CC List ?????????????:
> steam at eso.org
> Vst_Omega_Notification 
> uweilenm at eso.org 
> msterzik at eso.org 
> vst at eso.org
> par-vst at eso.org 
> acarlier at eso.org 
> akaufer at eso.org
> pietro.schipani at oacn.inaf.it
> tszeifer at eso.org
> gvaldes at eso.org
> par-tios at eso.org 
> par-optics at eso.org
> kuijken at strw.leidenuniv.nl
> 
> jspyromi at eso.orgVst_all 
> mboccas at eso.org 
> aleiva at eso.org
> 
> Telescope Downtime ??: 15:00
> Workload (hrs.) ?????: 27
> Detailed Description :
> Hi, 
> Since 2012-03-22 night the IQ degradation has become more recurring.
> It happends in a random way and in many different positions.
> With or without guiding and/or with or without doing active optics.
> 
> As far as I know, the only thing that changed duirng this week is that guideprobe was enable on March 22th 2012. 
> 
> The following are some examples of 2 different OBs
> 
> 
> This was without guiding and AO loop was closed only in OB 639814 and 639838 
> ================================================================================================================================================================
> 2012-03-26T05:14:57 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78",14 ?0.82",14 ?0.77",16 ?0.91",10 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ?????3.2 ??- ???14.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:16:24 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????0.65", 4 ?0.63", 6 ?0.55", 4 ?0.86",13 ????1 ???0.73" 0.77" ??39.8 21.5 ???9.0 11.6 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.77 ?21.5 ?11.6 ?OT=0.80
> 2012-03-26T05:23:45 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????0.69", 6 ?0.63",13 ?0.67",15 ?1.03",16 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????30.2 ??- ???13.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:25:15 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????0.52", 9 ?0.51", 7 ?0.48", 3 ?1.02",16 ????1 ???0.70" 0.73" ??58.8 44.5 ???9.5 11.3 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?33.0 ?11.4 ?OT=0.76
> 2012-03-26T05:27:21 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 5 ?0.63",10 ?0.61",10 ?0.93",15 ????0 ???0.71" ?-- ????23.5 ??- ????9.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:28:46 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.77", 6 ?0.62",10 ?0.58",12 ?0.96",14 ????0 ???0.74" 0.72" ??39.6 31.6 ??10.7 10.1 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?32.5 ?11.0 ?OT=0.75
> 2012-03-26T05:30:46 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84",10 ?0.80",14 ?0.74",17 ?0.81",14 ????1 ???0.79" ?-- ?????3.8 ??- ???13.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> 2012-03-26T05:32:12 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.76", 8 ?0.68",16 ?0.66",12 ?0.93",17 ????0 ???0.75" 0.77" ??18.9 11.3 ??12.4 12.9 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?27.2 ?11.5 ?OT=0.80
> 2012-03-26T05:34:15 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.71", 6 ?0.61", 9 ?0.62", 7 ?1.07",20 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ????33.4 ??- ????9.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:35:44 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.66", 6 ?0.58",10 ?0.58", 6 ?0.99",20 ????0 ???0.71" 0.72" ??35.7 34.5 ???9.9 ?9.7 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?28.7 ?11.1 ?OT=0.75
> 2012-03-26T05:37:47 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????0.71", 6 ?0.61",11 ?0.56", 9 ?0.77",14 ????0 ???0.69" ?-- ????29.9 ??- ???10.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:39:15 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????0.68", 4 ?0.57", 8 ?0.57", 6 ?1.00",22 ????1 ???0.71" 0.70" ??40.2 35.1 ???9.5 10.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?29.7 ?10.9 ?OT=0.73
> 2012-03-26T05:41:21 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 8 ?0.70",14 ?0.65", 9 ?0.92",19 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ????18.5 ??- ???11.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:42:49 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.70",11 ?0.63", 8 ?0.80",13 ????0 ???0.72" 0.73" ??18.7 18.6 ??10.1 10.8 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?28.2 ?10.9 ?OT=0.76
> 2012-03-26T05:44:52 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 6 ?0.56", 9 ?0.56", 8 ?0.88",16 ????0 ???0.66" ?-- ????34.3 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:46:21 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.63", 6 ?0.53",10 ?0.51", 7 ?0.90",20 ????1 ???0.65" 0.66" ??40.0 37.2 ???9.5 ?9.6 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.73 ?29.3 ?10.7 ?OT=0.68
> 2012-03-26T05:52:44 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73",14 ?0.74",17 ?0.60",11 ?0.68", 9 ????0 ???0.71" ?-- ????14.2 ??- ???13.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:54:13 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????0.59", 5 ?0.51", 7 ?0.47", 6 ?0.92",18 ????1 ???0.65" 0.68" ??50.5 32.4 ???9.3 11.2 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?29.6 ?10.8 ?OT=0.70
> 2012-03-26T05:56:23 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 7 ?0.65",12 ?0.56", 6 ?0.82",12 ????0 ???0.70" ?-- ????23.8 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T05:57:53 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 8 ?0.66",13 ?0.59", 8 ?0.82",11 ????0 ???0.70" 0.70" ??23.1 23.4 ??10.5 10.1 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?29.0 ?10.7 ?OT=0.73
> 2012-03-26T05:59:55 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 4 ?0.54", 8 ?0.51", 6 ?0.86",16 ????0 ???0.66" ?-- ????39.5 ??- ????8.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:01:20 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????0.65", 4 ?0.55", 8 ?0.50", 8 ?0.92",15 ????1 ???0.68" 0.67" ??45.1 42.3 ???9.4 ?9.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?30.2 ?10.6 ?OT=0.69
> 2012-03-26T06:03:28 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????0.62", 9 ?0.64",10 ?0.60", 9 ?0.89",10 ????0 ???0.70" ?-- ????26.1 ??- ???10.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:04:54 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????0.63", 6 ?0.58",10 ?0.56", 7 ?0.91",14 ????0 ???0.69" 0.69" ??32.6 29.3 ???9.4 ?9.7 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?30.1 ?10.5 ?OT=0.72
> 2012-03-26T06:07:02 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75",13 ?0.74",14 ?0.72",12 ?0.76",10 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ?????2.2 ??- ???12.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:08:31 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????0.90",16 ?0.90",14 ?0.81",13 ?0.78", 6 ????0 ???0.84" 0.79" ???1.8 ?2.0 ??13.5 12.8 ?????????A ?A ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?28.0 ?10.7 ?OT=0.82
> 2012-03-26T06:10:39 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????0.76",11 ?0.78",16 ?0.70",10 ?0.80", 9 ????1 ???0.76" ?-- ?????6.9 ??- ???12.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> 2012-03-26T06:12:05 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????0.74", 3 ?0.64", 7 ?0.59", 5 ?0.87",12 ????0 ???0.72" 0.74" ??27.6 17.3 ???7.8 10.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.2 ?10.6 ?OT=0.77
> 2012-03-26T06:14:13 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78",12 ?0.72",14 ?0.60",10 ?0.83",12 ????0 ???0.73" ?-- ????20.3 ??- ???11.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:15:38 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????0.61", 5 ?0.58", 8 ?0.53", 6 ?0.93",19 ????0 ???0.68" 0.71" ??37.1 28.7 ???9.2 10.4 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.3 ?10.6 ?OT=0.73
> 2012-03-26T06:17:46 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????0.64", 8 ?0.58", 8 ?0.53", 5 ?0.95",16 ????0 ???0.67" ?-- ????35.6 ??- ????9.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:19:15 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????0.60", 7 ?0.56", 7 ?0.54", 7 ?0.91",15 ????0 ???0.66" 0.67" ??32.6 34.1 ???8.9 ?9.3 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.7 ?10.5 ?OT=0.69
> 2012-03-26T06:21:26 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 8 ?0.66", 9 ?0.59", 7 ?0.77",15 ????0 ???0.68" ?-- ????16.9 ??- ????9.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> 2012-03-26T06:22:51 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????0.69",11 ?0.62",13 ?0.61", 7 ?0.82",14 ????0 ???0.67" 0.68" ??19.1 18.0 ??10.7 ?9.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?27.2 ?10.5 ?OT=0.70
> ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> =================================================================================================================================================================
> 
> 
> This was with guinding and AO loop closed during the whole OB
> ================================================================================================================================================================
> 2012-03-26T06:31:02 ?625363 ?i_SDSS ???????0.58",10 ?0.59", 6 ?0.53", 6 ?1.22",15 ????1 ???0.74" ?-- ????47.8 ??- ????9.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ??????????????
> 2012-03-26T06:35:43 ?625363 ?i_SDSS ???????0.55",11 ?0.58", 7 ?0.54", 6 ?1.32",19 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ????49.0 ??- ???10.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ???????????????
> 2012-03-26T06:40:27 ?625363 ?i_SDSS ???????0.56",10 ?0.58", 5 ?0.56", 6 ?1.35",20 ????1 ???0.75" ?-- ????49.2 ??- ???10.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ??????????????
> 2012-03-26T06:45:07 ?625363 ?i_SDSS ???????0.54", 7 ?0.59", 8 ?0.57", 9 ?1.33",18 ????1 ???0.78" ?-- ????51.0 ??- ???11.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ??????????????
> 2012-03-26T06:49:51 ?625363 ?i_SDSS ???????0.59",12 ?0.60", 8 ?0.55", 7 ?1.11",14 ????1 ???0.74" 0.75" ??44.1 48.2 ??10.6 10.6 ?????????A ?C ?B ?A ?A ?A ????C ?????????????????1.1 ?OT=0.70
> ================================================================================================================================================================
> 
> In the meantime I'm assigning this to S. Mieske 
> Regards
> Carlos
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- ?Worklog & Comments Section ---------------
> 
> Worklog and Comments : 
> ??03/26/12 11:17:48 ????smieske
> ?????Thanks Carlos for putting this ticket and giving it 'Critical' priority, to which I full agree. I reassign to Optics for the time being, and include Pietro just in case.
> 
> ?????We have had to repeat of order 5-6 hours worth of OBs in the nights March 23 and March 25, due to IQ degradation. 
> 
> ?????It is difficult to make remote analysis. For one, the external IQ is quite good which makes any defocus become very apparent.
> 
> ?????A few questions, trying to isolate the problem:
> 
> ?????- Is the guide probe by any chance physically vignetting part of the FOV, in particular the edges where auxiliary chips are? (should not be the case, but better ask). Is the real position corresponding to that indicated in the GUI?
> ?????- Is the ADC deployed and in SIM? Should not be.
> ?????- Has the noise in the IA images increased strongly? See 44375, 41464.
> ?????- Is the magnitude restriction of IA stars working correctly? Have a look at ocmia.fits images in DETDATA at times before strong IA degradation: are the donuts unsaturated and noise-free?
> ?????- IA corrections are apparently converging, so I assume that correcitons are being sent to the telescope? Please doublecheck by sending a few aberrations via vstaberwriteGUI (or something like that) in twilight. Do standard star aquisition which brings system into shape. Then apply the aberrations and check what the OCAM system sends back in a new aquisition.
> ?????- Are the passive forces controlling the mirrors still being sent at preset, and not every 30s?
> ?????- Do we by any chance have a new focal plane tilt? I see that chip 96 at one edge is typically most out of focus. But this is a remote analysis, and I do not know how this would happen anyway.
> ?????- Is M2 'jumping' spontaneously?
> 
> ?????Any further clues most welcome. I will be at Gemini Observatory the next 3 days, so hopefully Thomas Szeifert has some bright ideas? Thomas comes up on Thursday I think, and me on Friday.
> 
> ?????Thanks,
> ?????Steffen
> 
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Optical 
> ?????Area/Instrument Type Changed: TELESCOPE 
> ?????System/Instrument Changed: OPTICS & SUPPORT 
> ?????Subsystem Changed: ?
> ?????Modified By: smieske 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-26 11:17:48 
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Optical 
> ?????Area/Instrument Type Changed: TELESCOPE 
> ?????System/Instrument Changed: OPTICS & SUPPORT 
> ?????Subsystem Changed: ?
> ?????Modified By: smieske 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-26 11:17:48 
> ??03/26/12 11:48:44 ????tszeifer
> ?????The root cause for the image degradation is the curved focal field of the telescope (principally at wavelength > 550 nm) imaged by a flat detector plane. A little bit of defocus will cause about the degradation reported in the ticket. 
> 
> ?????According to the reports it only occurs in open loop observations and only with the red r,i,z,H_alpha filters.
> 
> ?????It would occur more often when the seeing is very good. The seeing was quit good in the last weeks.
> 
> ?????When ever you detect image degradation you can stop the auto fetch and force an IA.START = "T".
> 
> ?????I think that we will have to repeat >>10 of the observations for this reason.
> ??03/26/12 20:31:48 ????smieske
> ?????Can you please backup all ocmia.fits images from March22nd onwards in DETDATA into some subdirectory. Just to make sure they are not erased. And please, send me a 'ls -ltr ocmia*fits' of DETDATA as it is currently, so we keep the information of timestamp vs. image number.
> 
> ?????Thanks,
> ?????Steffen
> ??03/27/12 02:23:08 ????vst
> ?????Hi Steffen, 
> ?????-The guideprobe is not vignetting
> ?????-ADC is OUT of Focal Plane and not in SIM
> ?????-The magnitude restriction is working OK. Although in some images I saw some noisy images the previous days, the examples that I paste were always OK.
> ?????-I haven't seen M2 jumping.
> 
> ?????Hi Thomas,
> ?????The degradation also happends with AO loop closed as it is shown in the KIDS OB pasted before.
> 
> ?????On the night the 23/03/2012 I enabled a couple of times the IA START keyword to T in order to perform an AO correction (Vphas concatenation) but even with this the degradation persisted.
> 
> ?????===========================================================================================================================================
> ?????2012-03-24T01:48:26 ?639915 ?z_SDSS ???????0.89", 4 ?0.81", 7 ?0.81", 5 ?0.99",12 ????0 ???0.88" ?-- ????16.3 ??- ????7.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:49:53 ?639915 ?z_SDSS ???????0.83", 3 ?0.77", 4 ?0.75", 5 ?0.91", 9 ????1 ???0.84" 0.86" ??17.3 16.8 ???6.7 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.86 ?16.8 ?7.2 ?OT=0.89
> ?????2012-03-24T01:51:55 ?639918 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.74",10 ?0.71", 5 ?0.89",11 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ????19.2 ??- ????7.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:53:25 ?639918 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.73", 9 ?0.69", 5 ?0.87",12 ????0 ???0.78" 0.79" ??19.6 19.4 ???7.6 ?7.7 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?18.1 ?7.4 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-24T01:55:29 ?639921 ?z_SDSS ???????0.82", 8 ?0.58", 4 ?0.59", 5 ?0.91",11 ????1 ???0.75" ?-- ????44.3 ??- ????7.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T01:56:55 ?639921 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78", 4 ?0.61", 9 ?0.56", 4 ?0.90", 9 ????1 ???0.73" 0.74" ??40.9 42.6 ???8.2 ?8.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?26.3 ?7.6 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T01:58:55 ?639924 ?z_SDSS ???????0.82", 5 ?0.64", 7 ?0.61", 5 ?0.89",12 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????35.1 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:00:20 ?639924 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 5 ?0.57", 6 ?0.56", 3 ?0.92",14 ????1 ???0.72" 0.74" ??42.4 38.8 ???8.1 ?8.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?29.4 ?7.7 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T02:02:20 ?639927 ?z_SDSS ???????0.80",10 ?0.57", 3 ?0.54", 4 ?0.99",16 ????1 ???0.76" ?-- ????53.3 ??- ????9.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:03:49 ?639927 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 8 ?0.57", 6 ?0.53", 5 ?0.97",16 ????1 ???0.74" 0.75" ??52.8 53.1 ???9.2 ?9.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?34.1 ?8.0 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-24T02:05:57 ?639930 ?z_SDSS ???????0.90",12 ?0.59", 5 ?0.57", 4 ?0.97",18 ????1 ???0.78" ?-- ????51.0 ??- ????9.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:07:22 ?639930 ?z_SDSS ???????0.86", 8 ?0.62", 4 ?0.58", 3 ?0.92",15 ????1 ???0.80" 0.79" ??49.5 50.3 ???9.3 ?9.6 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?36.8 ?8.3 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-24T02:09:28 ?639933 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88",12 ?0.64", 4 ?0.63", 4 ?1.03",17 ????1 ???0.83" ?-- ????47.1 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:10:53 ?639933 ?z_SDSS ???????0.96",12 ?0.77", 4 ?0.75", 3 ?1.12",14 ????1 ???0.94" 0.89" ??37.5 42.3 ???9.3 ?9.4 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?37.6 ?8.4 ?OT=0.92
> ?????2012-03-24T02:12:59 ?639936 ?z_SDSS ???????0.98",13 ?0.73", 5 ?0.71", 4 ?1.06",13 ????1 ???0.91" ?-- ????43.8 ??- ???10.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:14:28 ?639936 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87",10 ?0.62", 3 ?0.61", 3 ?1.05",15 ????1 ???0.82" 0.86" ??49.8 46.8 ???9.5 ?9.9 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?38.8 ?8.6 ?OT=0.90
> ?????2012-03-24T02:19:53 ?639939 ?z_SDSS ???????0.77", 4 ?0.64", 4 ?0.62", 5 ?0.88", 9 ????1 ???0.75" ?-- ????32.5 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:21:22 ?639939 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 4 ?0.67", 8 ?0.65", 6 ?0.81", 9 ????0 ???0.73" 0.74" ??16.4 24.4 ???7.8 ?7.4 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?37.2 ?8.5 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T02:23:32 ?639942 ?z_SDSS ???????0.83", 5 ?0.74", 7 ?0.72", 7 ?0.86", 9 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????14.1 ??- ????7.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:25:00 ?639942 ?z_SDSS ???????0.93", 4 ?0.81", 5 ?0.76", 4 ?0.90", 7 ????0 ???0.86" 0.82" ??18.1 16.1 ???6.3 ?7.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?35.1 ?8.3 ?OT=0.86
> ?????2012-03-24T02:27:11 ?639945 ?z_SDSS ???????0.85", 4 ?0.77", 7 ?0.73", 7 ?0.90", 5 ????0 ???0.82" ?-- ????18.6 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:28:40 ?639945 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 4 ?0.74", 5 ?0.71", 4 ?0.86", 9 ????0 ???0.82" 0.82" ??22.6 20.6 ???6.2 ?7.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?33.7 ?8.2 ?OT=0.85
> ?????2012-03-24T02:30:44 ?639948 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 4 ?0.80", 6 ?0.78", 4 ?0.99", 8 ????0 ???0.88" ?-- ????19.4 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:32:09 ?639948 ?z_SDSS ???????0.93", 6 ?0.88", 7 ?0.86", 4 ?1.04",10 ????0 ???0.93" 0.91" ??12.5 16.0 ???6.0 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?32.3 ?8.0 ?OT=0.94
> ?????2012-03-24T02:34:18 ?639951 ?z_SDSS ???????0.86", 5 ?0.82", 4 ?0.82", 6 ?0.97", 7 ????0 ???0.86" ?-- ?????9.2 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:35:47 ?639951 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 3 ?0.80", 4 ?0.83", 7 ?0.97",11 ????0 ???0.88" 0.87" ??14.0 11.6 ???6.3 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?30.7 ?7.9 ?OT=0.90
> ?????2012-03-24T02:37:58 ?639954 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87", 3 ?0.79", 5 ?0.84", 6 ?0.98",11 ????0 ???0.87" ?-- ????14.2 ??- ????6.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:39:23 ?639954 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 3 ?0.77", 5 ?0.78", 6 ?0.95", 9 ????0 ???0.84" 0.85" ??17.0 15.6 ???6.8 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?29.6 ?7.8 ?OT=0.89
> ?????2012-03-24T02:41:33 ?639957 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 5 ?0.79", 5 ?0.79", 5 ?0.89",10 ????0 ???0.85" ?-- ????13.9 ??- ????6.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:43:00 ?639957 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 6 ?0.81",10 ?0.82",10 ?0.93", 9 ????0 ???0.85" 0.85" ???9.8 11.8 ???9.1 ?7.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?28.4 ?7.8 ?OT=0.88
> ?????2012-03-24T02:45:11 ?639960 ?z_SDSS ???????0.80", 6 ?0.76", 9 ?0.76", 7 ?0.88", 8 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ????11.4 ??- ????8.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:46:40 ?639960 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87", 4 ?0.84", 8 ?0.86", 9 ?0.94", 9 ????0 ???0.88" 0.84" ???9.0 10.2 ???7.8 ?7.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?27.3 ?7.8 ?OT=0.87
> ?????2012-03-24T02:48:47 ?639963 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.77",10 ?0.75",11 ?0.87", 6 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????10.9 ??- ????8.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:50:16 ?639963 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.74",11 ?0.65",12 ?0.84", 9 ????0 ???0.75" 0.77" ??15.0 12.9 ??11.3 ?9.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?26.4 ?7.9 ?OT=0.80
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> 
> ?????========================================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????Regards
> ?????Carlos
> ??03/27/12 02:38:00 ????vst
> ?????Hi, 
> ?????As requested by S. Mieske I'm adding all the OBs with IQ degradation as Tech Downtime Since 2012-03-23 night
> ?????Regards
> ?????Carlos
> 
> ?????=================================================================================================
> ?????2012-03-24T00:42:46 ?735890 ?NB_659 ???????1.97",40 ?2.28",46 ?2.40",45 ?2.50",50 ??8!! ???2.30" ?-- ?????2.1 ??- ???43.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T00:45:27 ?735890 ?NB_659 ???????2.22",43 ?2.05",40 ?2.20",40 ?2.07",39 ??8!! ???2.12" ?-- ?????1.6 ??- ???37.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T00:48:11 ?735890 ?NB_659 ???????1.84",38 ?1.95",38 ?1.97",38 ?2.03",41 ??8!! ???1.96" 2.13" ???2.0 ?1.9 ??35.7 38.7 ?????????D ?A ?D ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??2.13 ?1.9 ?38.7 ?OT=2.16
> ?????2012-03-24T00:51:41 ?735893 ?NB_659 ???????2.00",28 ?2.01",32 ?1.96",32 ?1.96",32 ??7!! ???1.98" ?-- ?????1.3 ??- ???27.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T00:54:24 ?735893 ?NB_659 ???????1.57",24 ?1.70",27 ?1.69",26 ?1.96",31 ??7!! ???1.76" ?-- ?????5.4 ??- ???25.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T00:57:04 ?735893 ?NB_659 ???????1.98", 8 ?1.97", 7 ?1.95", 6 ?2.04", 8 ????0 ???2.01" 1.92" ???3.6 ?3.4 ???6.9 19.9 ?????????D ?A ?D ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??2.02 ?2.7 ?29.3 ?OT=1.94
> ?????2012-03-24T01:00:36 ?735896 ?NB_659 ???????1.92",26 ?1.98",27 ?1.97",28 ?1.94",29 ??7!! ???1.96" ?-- ?????2.8 ??- ???24.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T01:03:17 ?735896 ?NB_659 ???????1.94",25 ?1.82",22 ?1.82",24 ?1.82",25 ??6!! ???1.85" ?-- ?????2.4 ??- ???21.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?D ?- ?- ?- ????D ?????(735889) 
> ?????2012-03-24T01:06:01 ?735896 ?NB_659 ???????1.32",19 ?1.22",18 ?1.21",19 ?1.41",21 ????2 ???1.30" 1.70" ??12.0 ?5.7 ??16.5 20.9 ?????????D ?A ?D ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.92 ?3.7 ?26.5 ?OT=1.73
> ?????2012-03-24T01:13:51 ?735899 ?r_SDSS ???????0.85", 5 ?0.74", 7 ?0.71", 4 ?0.95",12 ????0 ???0.82" ?-- ????23.6 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:14:58 ?735899 ?r_SDSS ???????0.78", 4 ?0.77", 6 ?0.73", 5 ?0.89", 8 ????0 ???0.81" 0.81" ??14.9 19.2 ???7.0 ?7.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.64 ?7.6 ?21.6 ?OT=0.81
> ?????2012-03-24T01:22:13 ?735902 ?r_SDSS ???????0.93", 8 ?0.82", 7 ?0.79", 4 ?0.99", 9 ????0 ???0.89" ?-- ????19.4 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:23:21 ?735902 ?r_SDSS ???????0.83", 4 ?0.76", 5 ?0.73", 4 ?0.95", 8 ????0 ???0.82" 0.85" ??20.9 20.1 ???6.1 ?6.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.48 ?10.1 ?18.6 ?OT=0.85
> ?????2012-03-24T01:25:01 ?735905 ?r_SDSS ???????0.80", 4 ?0.76", 5 ?0.73", 4 ?0.99", 7 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????21.1 ??- ????6.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:26:10 ?735905 ?r_SDSS ???????0.91", 4 ?0.84", 7 ?0.80", 5 ?0.98", 8 ????0 ???0.89" 0.86" ??15.1 18.1 ???6.7 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.38 ?11.4 ?16.6 ?OT=0.86
> ?????2012-03-24T01:34:48 ?735908 ?i_SDSS ???????0.88", 4 ?0.85", 5 ?0.85", 4 ?1.10",12 ????0 ???0.93" ?-- ????16.0 ??- ????7.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:35:54 ?735908 ?i_SDSS ???????0.86", 4 ?0.88", 4 ?0.86", 5 ?1.11",10 ????0 ???0.95" 0.94" ??14.4 15.2 ???5.9 ?6.6 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.32 ?12.0 ?15.1 ?OT=0.96
> ?????2012-03-24T01:37:32 ?735911 ?i_SDSS ???????0.90", 5 ?0.86", 5 ?0.84", 4 ?1.09",10 ????0 ???0.94" ?-- ????17.8 ??- ????6.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:38:42 ?735911 ?i_SDSS ???????0.96", 5 ?0.96", 5 ?0.94", 5 ?1.13", 7 ????0 ???1.00" 0.97" ???9.5 13.6 ???6.2 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.27 ?12.2 ?14.1 ?OT=1.00
> ?????2012-03-24T01:40:18 ?735914 ?i_SDSS ???????0.95", 4 ?1.00", 4 ?0.96", 4 ?1.13",10 ????0 ???1.03" ?-- ?????8.6 ??- ????6.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(735889) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:41:23 ?735914 ?i_SDSS ???????1.05", 4 ?1.10", 4 ?1.14", 5 ?1.27", 8 ????0 ???1.16" 1.09" ???7.1 ?7.9 ???5.9 ?6.2 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(735889) ???1.2 ??1.25 ?11.7 ?13.2 ?OT=1.13
> ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% bad seeing. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> 
> ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% bad ellipticities. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????============================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????2012-03-24T01:48:26 ?639915 ?z_SDSS ???????0.89", 4 ?0.81", 7 ?0.81", 5 ?0.99",12 ????0 ???0.88" ?-- ????16.3 ??- ????7.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:49:53 ?639915 ?z_SDSS ???????0.83", 3 ?0.77", 4 ?0.75", 5 ?0.91", 9 ????1 ???0.84" 0.86" ??17.3 16.8 ???6.7 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.86 ?16.8 ?7.2 ?OT=0.89
> ?????2012-03-24T01:51:55 ?639918 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.74",10 ?0.71", 5 ?0.89",11 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ????19.2 ??- ????7.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T01:53:25 ?639918 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.73", 9 ?0.69", 5 ?0.87",12 ????0 ???0.78" 0.79" ??19.6 19.4 ???7.6 ?7.7 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?18.1 ?7.4 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-24T01:55:29 ?639921 ?z_SDSS ???????0.82", 8 ?0.58", 4 ?0.59", 5 ?0.91",11 ????1 ???0.75" ?-- ????44.3 ??- ????7.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T01:56:55 ?639921 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78", 4 ?0.61", 9 ?0.56", 4 ?0.90", 9 ????1 ???0.73" 0.74" ??40.9 42.6 ???8.2 ?8.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?26.3 ?7.6 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T01:58:55 ?639924 ?z_SDSS ???????0.82", 5 ?0.64", 7 ?0.61", 5 ?0.89",12 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????35.1 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:00:20 ?639924 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 5 ?0.57", 6 ?0.56", 3 ?0.92",14 ????1 ???0.72" 0.74" ??42.4 38.8 ???8.1 ?8.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?29.4 ?7.7 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T02:02:20 ?639927 ?z_SDSS ???????0.80",10 ?0.57", 3 ?0.54", 4 ?0.99",16 ????1 ???0.76" ?-- ????53.3 ??- ????9.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:03:49 ?639927 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 8 ?0.57", 6 ?0.53", 5 ?0.97",16 ????1 ???0.74" 0.75" ??52.8 53.1 ???9.2 ?9.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?34.1 ?8.0 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-24T02:05:57 ?639930 ?z_SDSS ???????0.90",12 ?0.59", 5 ?0.57", 4 ?0.97",18 ????1 ???0.78" ?-- ????51.0 ??- ????9.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:07:22 ?639930 ?z_SDSS ???????0.86", 8 ?0.62", 4 ?0.58", 3 ?0.92",15 ????1 ???0.80" 0.79" ??49.5 50.3 ???9.3 ?9.6 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.78 ?36.8 ?8.3 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-24T02:09:28 ?639933 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88",12 ?0.64", 4 ?0.63", 4 ?1.03",17 ????1 ???0.83" ?-- ????47.1 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:10:53 ?639933 ?z_SDSS ???????0.96",12 ?0.77", 4 ?0.75", 3 ?1.12",14 ????1 ???0.94" 0.89" ??37.5 42.3 ???9.3 ?9.4 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?37.6 ?8.4 ?OT=0.92
> ?????2012-03-24T02:12:59 ?639936 ?z_SDSS ???????0.98",13 ?0.73", 5 ?0.71", 4 ?1.06",13 ????1 ???0.91" ?-- ????43.8 ??- ???10.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:14:28 ?639936 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87",10 ?0.62", 3 ?0.61", 3 ?1.05",15 ????1 ???0.82" 0.86" ??49.8 46.8 ???9.5 ?9.9 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?38.8 ?8.6 ?OT=0.90
> ?????2012-03-24T02:19:53 ?639939 ?z_SDSS ???????0.77", 4 ?0.64", 4 ?0.62", 5 ?0.88", 9 ????1 ???0.75" ?-- ????32.5 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639914) 
> ?????2012-03-24T02:21:22 ?639939 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 4 ?0.67", 8 ?0.65", 6 ?0.81", 9 ????0 ???0.73" 0.74" ??16.4 24.4 ???7.8 ?7.4 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?37.2 ?8.5 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-24T02:23:32 ?639942 ?z_SDSS ???????0.83", 5 ?0.74", 7 ?0.72", 7 ?0.86", 9 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????14.1 ??- ????7.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:25:00 ?639942 ?z_SDSS ???????0.93", 4 ?0.81", 5 ?0.76", 4 ?0.90", 7 ????0 ???0.86" 0.82" ??18.1 16.1 ???6.3 ?7.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?35.1 ?8.3 ?OT=0.86
> ?????2012-03-24T02:27:11 ?639945 ?z_SDSS ???????0.85", 4 ?0.77", 7 ?0.73", 7 ?0.90", 5 ????0 ???0.82" ?-- ????18.6 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:28:40 ?639945 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 4 ?0.74", 5 ?0.71", 4 ?0.86", 9 ????0 ???0.82" 0.82" ??22.6 20.6 ???6.2 ?7.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?33.7 ?8.2 ?OT=0.85
> ?????2012-03-24T02:30:44 ?639948 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 4 ?0.80", 6 ?0.78", 4 ?0.99", 8 ????0 ???0.88" ?-- ????19.4 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:32:09 ?639948 ?z_SDSS ???????0.93", 6 ?0.88", 7 ?0.86", 4 ?1.04",10 ????0 ???0.93" 0.91" ??12.5 16.0 ???6.0 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?32.3 ?8.0 ?OT=0.94
> ?????2012-03-24T02:34:18 ?639951 ?z_SDSS ???????0.86", 5 ?0.82", 4 ?0.82", 6 ?0.97", 7 ????0 ???0.86" ?-- ?????9.2 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:35:47 ?639951 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 3 ?0.80", 4 ?0.83", 7 ?0.97",11 ????0 ???0.88" 0.87" ??14.0 11.6 ???6.3 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?30.7 ?7.9 ?OT=0.90
> ?????2012-03-24T02:37:58 ?639954 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87", 3 ?0.79", 5 ?0.84", 6 ?0.98",11 ????0 ???0.87" ?-- ????14.2 ??- ????6.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:39:23 ?639954 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 3 ?0.77", 5 ?0.78", 6 ?0.95", 9 ????0 ???0.84" 0.85" ??17.0 15.6 ???6.8 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?29.6 ?7.8 ?OT=0.89
> ?????2012-03-24T02:41:33 ?639957 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 5 ?0.79", 5 ?0.79", 5 ?0.89",10 ????0 ???0.85" ?-- ????13.9 ??- ????6.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:43:00 ?639957 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 6 ?0.81",10 ?0.82",10 ?0.93", 9 ????0 ???0.85" 0.85" ???9.8 11.8 ???9.1 ?7.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?28.4 ?7.8 ?OT=0.88
> ?????2012-03-24T02:45:11 ?639960 ?z_SDSS ???????0.80", 6 ?0.76", 9 ?0.76", 7 ?0.88", 8 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ????11.4 ??- ????8.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:46:40 ?639960 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87", 4 ?0.84", 8 ?0.86", 9 ?0.94", 9 ????0 ???0.88" 0.84" ???9.0 10.2 ???7.8 ?7.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?27.3 ?7.8 ?OT=0.87
> ?????2012-03-24T02:48:47 ?639963 ?z_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.77",10 ?0.75",11 ?0.87", 6 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????10.9 ??- ????8.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639914) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T02:50:16 ?639963 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.74",11 ?0.65",12 ?0.84", 9 ????0 ???0.75" 0.77" ??15.0 12.9 ??11.3 ?9.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639914) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?26.4 ?7.9 ?OT=0.80
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????==========================================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????2012-03-24T04:34:41 ?635618 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 7 ?0.71", 4 ?0.73", 3 ?1.25",16 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????25.8 ??- ????5.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:36:09 ?635618 ?r_SDSS ???????0.88", 3 ?0.77", 4 ?0.78", 6 ?1.15",12 ????0 ???0.87" 0.85" ??19.2 22.5 ???5.4 ?5.6 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.85 ?22.5 ?5.6 ?OT=0.84
> ?????2012-03-24T04:38:16 ?635621 ?r_SDSS ???????0.83", 7 ?0.77", 5 ?0.76", 4 ?1.10",14 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????17.2 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:39:44 ?635621 ?r_SDSS ???????0.79", 7 ?0.73", 8 ?0.72", 4 ?1.17",14 ????0 ???0.81" 0.82" ??23.0 20.1 ???6.5 ?6.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.83 ?21.3 ?5.8 ?OT=0.81
> ?????2012-03-24T04:41:52 ?635624 ?r_SDSS ???????0.81", 4 ?0.77", 4 ?0.77", 4 ?1.16",11 ????0 ???0.85" ?-- ????19.8 ??- ????4.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:43:17 ?635624 ?r_SDSS ???????0.82", 4 ?0.75", 4 ?0.76", 3 ?1.18",11 ????0 ???0.86" 0.85" ??23.4 21.6 ???5.5 ?5.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.84 ?21.4 ?5.6 ?OT=0.84
> ?????2012-03-24T04:45:25 ?635627 ?r_SDSS ???????0.84", 8 ?0.79", 4 ?0.77", 3 ?1.07",10 ????0 ???0.84" ?-- ????15.2 ??- ????4.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:46:50 ?635627 ?r_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.69", 4 ?0.69", 3 ?1.15",14 ????0 ???0.79" 0.81" ??25.4 20.3 ???6.0 ?5.4 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.83 ?21.1 ?5.6 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-24T04:48:55 ?635630 ?r_SDSS ???????0.72", 5 ?0.72", 4 ?0.73", 4 ?1.14",11 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????19.3 ??- ????5.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:50:24 ?635630 ?r_SDSS ???????0.79", 6 ?0.71", 5 ?0.73", 3 ?1.14",13 ????0 ???0.81" 0.80" ??23.3 21.3 ???5.5 ?5.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.83 ?21.2 ?5.5 ?OT=0.79
> ?????2012-03-24T04:52:36 ?635633 ?r_SDSS ???????0.75", 7 ?0.72", 4 ?0.71", 4 ?1.06",12 ????0 ???0.78" ?-- ????18.7 ??- ????5.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:54:03 ?635633 ?r_SDSS ???????0.74", 7 ?0.67", 3 ?0.67", 3 ?1.12",15 ????0 ???0.77" 0.78" ??26.5 22.6 ???5.6 ?5.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?21.4 ?5.5 ?OT=0.76
> ?????2012-03-24T04:56:08 ?635636 ?r_SDSS ???????0.71", 7 ?0.66", 5 ?0.66", 3 ?1.07",12 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????23.6 ??- ????5.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T04:57:33 ?635636 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 7 ?0.70", 4 ?0.67", 3 ?1.04",11 ????0 ???0.76" 0.76" ??19.7 21.6 ???5.3 ?5.4 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?21.4 ?5.5 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-24T04:59:44 ?635639 ?r_SDSS ???????0.81", 7 ?0.75", 4 ?0.76", 5 ?1.11",13 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????19.6 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:01:12 ?635639 ?r_SDSS ???????0.79", 7 ?0.75", 3 ?0.75", 4 ?1.11",11 ????0 ???0.82" 0.82" ??19.4 19.5 ???5.1 ?5.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?21.2 ?5.5 ?OT=0.81
> ?????2012-03-24T05:06:53 ?635642 ?r_SDSS ???????0.77", 4 ?0.77", 4 ?0.79", 6 ?1.12",14 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????13.9 ??- ????5.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:08:19 ?635642 ?r_SDSS ???????0.75", 4 ?0.71", 3 ?0.71", 4 ?1.15",14 ????0 ???0.80" 0.81" ??24.2 19.0 ???5.7 ?5.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?21.0 ?5.5 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-24T05:10:24 ?635645 ?r_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.69", 4 ?0.71", 3 ?1.20",14 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????23.6 ??- ????5.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:11:54 ?635645 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 6 ?0.73", 3 ?0.74", 3 ?1.19",13 ????0 ???0.81" 0.80" ??20.5 22.1 ???5.1 ?5.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?21.1 ?5.5 ?OT=0.79
> ?????2012-03-24T05:13:58 ?635648 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67", 6 ?0.64", 4 ?0.64", 3 ?1.25",15 ????0 ???0.76" ?-- ????30.9 ??- ????6.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:15:23 ?635648 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 5 ?0.63", 4 ?0.64", 2 ?1.25",15 ????0 ???0.75" 0.76" ??30.9 30.9 ???5.6 ?5.9 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?22.0 ?5.6 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-24T05:17:29 ?635651 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 5 ?0.65", 4 ?0.64", 3 ?1.25",17 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????30.2 ??- ????6.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:18:56 ?635651 ?r_SDSS ???????0.63", 7 ?0.61", 6 ?0.60", 5 ?1.29",16 ????0 ???0.73" 0.74" ??35.5 32.9 ???6.7 ?6.4 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?22.9 ?5.6 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-24T05:21:03 ?635654 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 6 ?0.63", 4 ?0.66", 4 ?1.32",17 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????33.3 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:22:33 ?635654 ?r_SDSS ???????0.68", 6 ?0.61", 4 ?0.62", 3 ?1.26",19 ????0 ???0.76" 0.77" ??36.8 35.0 ???6.7 ?6.7 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.80 ?23.8 ?5.7 ?OT=0.75
> ?????2012-03-24T05:24:37 ?635657 ?r_SDSS ???????0.64", 6 ?0.61", 4 ?0.66", 4 ?1.32",18 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????32.9 ??- ????6.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:26:02 ?635657 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 6 ?0.64", 4 ?0.66", 3 ?1.26",16 ????0 ???0.76" 0.76" ??29.7 31.3 ???5.8 ?6.3 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?24.3 ?5.7 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-24T05:28:12 ?635660 ?r_SDSS ???????0.62", 4 ?0.64", 4 ?0.68", 3 ?1.25",14 ????0 ???0.76" ?-- ????28.9 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:29:37 ?635660 ?r_SDSS ???????0.68", 4 ?0.66", 4 ?0.69", 3 ?1.34",18 ????0 ???0.79" 0.78" ??29.8 29.4 ???6.0 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?24.7 ?5.8 ?OT=0.76
> ?????2012-03-24T05:31:42 ?635663 ?r_SDSS ???????0.63", 6 ?0.60", 5 ?0.61", 4 ?1.31",19 ????0 ???0.73" ?-- ????35.6 ??- ????6.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:33:10 ?635663 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67", 4 ?0.66", 3 ?0.67", 3 ?1.18",16 ????0 ???0.76" 0.74" ??26.0 30.8 ???6.0 ?6.5 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?25.1 ?5.8 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-24T05:35:17 ?635666 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 6 ?0.64", 4 ?0.68", 3 ?1.28",18 ????0 ???0.78" ?-- ????30.8 ??- ????6.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635617) ?
> ?????2012-03-24T05:36:42 ?635666 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 4 ?0.66", 3 ?0.68", 4 ?1.24",15 ????0 ???0.76" 0.77" ??25.1 28.0 ???5.5 ?5.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635617) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?25.2 ?5.8 ?OT=0.76
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????==================================================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????2012-03-25T07:10:06 ?635208 ?r_SDSS ???????0.84", 7 ?0.81", 5 ?0.80", 3 ?1.20",12 ????0 ???0.90" ?-- ????21.0 ??- ????6.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:11:34 ?635208 ?r_SDSS ???????0.85", 6 ?0.88", 5 ?0.84", 5 ?1.31",15 ????0 ???0.94" 0.92" ??16.7 18.9 ???7.4 ?6.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.92 ?18.9 ?6.8 ?OT=0.90
> ?????2012-03-25T07:13:38 ?635211 ?r_SDSS ???????0.69", 4 ?0.69", 3 ?0.72", 3 ?1.42",19 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????29.3 ??- ????6.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:15:03 ?635211 ?r_SDSS ???????0.71", 4 ?0.69", 4 ?0.78", 5 ?1.43",19 ????0 ???0.85" 0.84" ??30.0 29.6 ???6.7 ?6.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.88 ?24.3 ?6.8 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-25T07:17:09 ?635214 ?r_SDSS ???????0.72", 4 ?0.69", 4 ?0.72", 4 ?1.37",17 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????30.9 ??- ????6.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:18:37 ?635214 ?r_SDSS ???????0.65", 4 ?0.64", 4 ?0.68", 4 ?1.39",19 ????0 ???0.80" 0.81" ??35.3 33.1 ???7.0 ?6.5 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.86 ?27.2 ?6.7 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-25T07:20:51 ?635217 ?r_SDSS ???????0.72", 4 ?0.68", 3 ?0.72", 3 ?1.42",23 ????1 ???0.84" ?-- ????33.9 ??- ????7.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(635207) 
> ?????2012-03-25T07:22:16 ?635217 ?r_SDSS ???????0.83", 3 ?0.83", 3 ?0.87", 3 ?1.35",16 ????0 ???0.93" 0.89" ??18.5 26.2 ???6.0 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.86 ?27.0 ?6.7 ?OT=0.86
> ?????2012-03-25T07:24:25 ?635220 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 6 ?0.69", 5 ?0.75", 4 ?1.50",22 ????1 ???0.86" ?-- ????35.8 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(635207) 
> ?????2012-03-25T07:25:52 ?635220 ?r_SDSS ???????0.60", 4 ?0.58", 4 ?0.63", 3 ?1.51",21 ????1 ???0.78" 0.82" ??45.3 40.5 ???7.0 ?7.5 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.86 ?29.7 ?6.8 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-25T07:35:08 ?635223 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 5 ?0.70", 4 ?0.70", 3 ?1.24",17 ????0 ???0.82" ?-- ????29.2 ??- ????6.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:36:34 ?635223 ?r_SDSS ???????0.73", 6 ?0.71", 3 ?0.70", 4 ?1.11",14 ????0 ???0.79" 0.80" ??22.6 25.9 ???6.6 ?6.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.85 ?29.0 ?6.8 ?OT=0.79
> ?????2012-03-25T07:38:41 ?635226 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 3 ?0.75", 6 ?0.75", 5 ?1.21",15 ????0 ???0.84" ?-- ????21.9 ??- ????7.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:40:10 ?635226 ?r_SDSS ???????0.63", 5 ?0.61", 3 ?0.62", 2 ?1.22",18 ????0 ???0.75" 0.79" ??38.6 30.3 ???6.8 ?6.9 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.84 ?29.2 ?6.8 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-25T07:42:14 ?635229 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 4 ?0.63", 4 ?0.66", 3 ?1.35",22 ????1 ???0.80" ?-- ????37.8 ??- ????7.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(635207) 
> ?????2012-03-25T07:43:39 ?635229 ?r_SDSS ???????0.64", 5 ?0.59", 5 ?0.66", 5 ?1.35",21 ????1 ???0.79" 0.80" ??40.2 39.0 ???7.7 ?7.5 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.83 ?30.4 ?6.9 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-25T07:48:28 ?635232 ?r_SDSS ???????0.66", 3 ?0.64", 4 ?0.68", 3 ?1.23",18 ????0 ???0.78" ?-- ????29.7 ??- ????6.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:49:56 ?635232 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 7 ?0.66", 4 ?0.62", 3 ?1.05",12 ????0 ???0.74" 0.76" ??28.0 28.9 ???5.8 ?6.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.83 ?30.3 ?6.8 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-25T07:51:59 ?635235 ?r_SDSS ???????0.80", 7 ?0.77", 6 ?0.77", 8 ?1.03",11 ????0 ???0.82" ?-- ????12.9 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:53:25 ?635235 ?r_SDSS ???????0.68", 5 ?0.69", 6 ?0.70", 9 ?1.06",11 ????0 ???0.76" 0.79" ??18.6 15.8 ???7.1 ?6.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?28.8 ?6.8 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-25T07:55:32 ?635238 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 8 ?0.70", 4 ?0.70", 4 ?1.03",13 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????15.4 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T07:57:01 ?635238 ?r_SDSS ???????0.68", 6 ?0.69", 4 ?0.65", 5 ?1.09",14 ????0 ???0.75" 0.75" ??21.9 18.7 ???6.3 ?6.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.82 ?27.9 ?6.7 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-25T07:59:11 ?635241 ?r_SDSS ???????0.69", 5 ?0.67", 7 ?0.67", 7 ?1.02",13 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????20.1 ??- ????7.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:00:40 ?635241 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76",10 ?0.76", 7 ?0.71", 8 ?0.87", 8 ????0 ???0.76" 0.76" ???5.5 12.8 ???7.1 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?26.6 ?6.8 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-25T08:02:47 ?635244 ?r_SDSS ???????0.73", 6 ?0.72", 7 ?0.73", 8 ?0.98",10 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????12.7 ??- ????7.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:04:12 ?635244 ?r_SDSS ???????0.78",11 ?0.83", 8 ?0.75",10 ?0.91", 7 ????0 ???0.80" 0.79" ???3.7 ?8.2 ???7.7 ?7.5 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?25.2 ?6.8 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-25T08:06:26 ?635247 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 4 ?0.74", 7 ?0.75", 9 ?1.00", 8 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ????13.0 ??- ????7.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:07:54 ?635247 ?r_SDSS ???????0.71", 5 ?0.72", 7 ?0.74",10 ?1.10",11 ????0 ???0.80" 0.80" ??16.6 14.8 ???7.7 ?7.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?24.5 ?6.9 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-25T08:10:06 ?635250 ?r_SDSS ???????0.70", 3 ?0.74", 6 ?0.74", 7 ?1.05",11 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????14.8 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:11:31 ?635250 ?r_SDSS ???????0.79", 7 ?0.84", 8 ?0.78", 8 ?0.95", 7 ????0 ???0.84" 0.81" ???6.6 10.7 ???7.4 ?7.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?23.6 ?6.9 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-25T08:13:46 ?635253 ?r_SDSS ???????0.78", 6 ?0.80", 8 ?0.78", 9 ?0.98", 7 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ?????8.3 ??- ????7.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:15:11 ?635253 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 4 ?0.73", 5 ?0.72", 6 ?1.11",14 ????0 ???0.81" 0.82" ??21.5 14.9 ???6.5 ?7.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?23.0 ?6.9 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-25T08:17:19 ?635256 ?r_SDSS ???????0.72", 4 ?0.74", 7 ?0.74", 7 ?1.02",10 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????13.8 ??- ????7.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635207) ?
> ?????2012-03-25T08:18:48 ?635256 ?r_SDSS ???????0.71", 3 ?0.72", 7 ?0.74", 8 ?1.09",12 ????0 ???0.80" 0.80" ??19.1 16.4 ???7.7 ?7.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635207) ???1.4 ??0.81 ?22.6 ?6.9 ?OT=0.78
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????========================================================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????2012-03-26T00:54:58 ?736335 ?NB_659 ???????0.77", 4 ?0.70", 4 ?0.71", 4 ?1.36",21 ????1 ???0.86" ?-- ????34.9 ??- ????8.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T00:57:40 ?736335 ?NB_659 ???????0.76", 3 ?0.71", 5 ?0.67", 4 ?1.29",19 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????35.9 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:00:25 ?736335 ?NB_659 ???????0.74", 5 ?0.72", 4 ?0.72", 4 ?1.39",22 ????2 ???0.87" 0.85" ??35.0 35.3 ???8.9 ?8.3 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.85 ?35.3 ?8.3 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-26T01:03:45 ?736338 ?NB_659 ???????0.86", 3 ?0.83", 6 ?0.82", 6 ?1.30",16 ????1 ???0.94" ?-- ????24.8 ??- ????8.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T01:06:28 ?736338 ?NB_659 ???????0.78", 5 ?0.73", 4 ?0.71", 5 ?1.25",18 ????0 ???0.85" ?-- ????32.4 ??- ????8.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:09:08 ?736338 ?NB_659 ???????0.79", 6 ?0.77", 5 ?0.72", 3 ?1.25",18 ????0 ???0.87" 0.89" ??28.7 28.6 ???7.7 ?8.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.87 ?32.0 ?8.2 ?OT=0.85
> ?????2012-03-26T01:12:27 ?736341 ?NB_659 ???????0.85", 5 ?0.82", 4 ?0.78", 7 ?1.26",15 ????1 ???0.91" ?-- ????24.7 ??- ????8.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T01:15:10 ?736341 ?NB_659 ???????0.92", 6 ?0.88", 3 ?0.83", 5 ?1.16",13 ????0 ???0.95" ?-- ????17.1 ??- ????7.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:17:54 ?736341 ?NB_659 ???????0.90", 8 ?0.86", 6 ?0.79", 4 ?1.19",16 ????0 ???0.93" 0.93" ??22.1 21.3 ???7.9 ?7.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.89 ?28.4 ?8.1 ?OT=0.88
> ?????2012-03-26T01:25:26 ?736344 ?r_SDSS ???????1.36", 7 ?1.27",13 ?1.17", 8 ?1.41",14 ????0 ???1.30" ?-- ?????8.2 ??- ????9.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:26:36 ?736344 ?r_SDSS ???????0.90", 3 ?0.85", 4 ?0.82", 3 ?1.17",14 ????1 ???0.95" 1.12" ??25.5 16.8 ???7.3 ?8.6 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.95 ?25.5 ?8.2 ?OT=1.04
> ?????2012-03-26T01:29:31 ?736347 ?r_SDSS ???????1.12", 4 ?1.11", 8 ?1.08", 5 ?1.26",10 ????0 ???1.15" ?-- ?????7.9 ??- ????6.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:30:37 ?736347 ?r_SDSS ???????1.18", 6 ?1.10", 4 ?1.12", 5 ?1.40",14 ????0 ???1.19" 1.17" ??11.8 ?9.9 ???7.0 ?6.9 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.99 ?22.4 ?7.9 ?OT=1.08
> ?????2012-03-26T01:32:22 ?736350 ?r_SDSS ???????0.76", 3 ?0.65", 4 ?0.67", 3 ?1.37",22 ????2 ???0.84" ?-- ????43.7 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T01:33:31 ?736350 ?r_SDSS ???????0.93", 3 ?0.88", 5 ?0.87", 4 ?1.20",14 ????0 ???0.96" 0.90" ??19.1 31.4 ???6.9 ?7.5 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.98 ?23.9 ?7.9 ?OT=0.84
> ?????2012-03-26T01:41:55 ?736353 ?i_SDSS ???????0.76", 6 ?0.70", 4 ?0.70", 4 ?1.15",17 ????0 ???0.83" ?-- ????28.1 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736334) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T01:43:05 ?736353 ?i_SDSS ???????0.65", 5 ?0.65", 4 ?0.64", 4 ?1.39",24 ????2 ???0.81" 0.82" ??39.6 33.9 ???9.2 ?8.6 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.96 ?25.3 ?8.0 ?OT=0.78
> ?????2012-03-26T01:45:03 ?736356 ?i_SDSS ???????0.75", 3 ?0.64", 4 ?0.66", 4 ?1.34",25 ????2 ???0.82" ?-- ????43.0 ??- ????8.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T01:46:08 ?736356 ?i_SDSS ???????0.89",10 ?0.79", 7 ?0.76", 9 ?1.15",12 ????0 ???0.88" 0.85" ??22.4 32.7 ??10.1 ?9.4 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.94 ?26.2 ?8.2 ?OT=0.81
> ?????2012-03-26T01:48:40 ?736359 ?i_SDSS ???????0.78", 8 ?0.69", 6 ?0.69", 4 ?1.28",22 ????2 ???0.84" ?-- ????35.9 ??- ????9.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736334) 
> ?????2012-03-26T01:49:48 ?736359 ?i_SDSS ???????0.56", 6 ?0.55", 4 ?0.53", 4 ?1.47",25 ????2 ???0.75" 0.79" ??56.9 46.4 ???9.5 ?9.4 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736334) ???1.2 ??0.93 ?28.5 ?8.3 ?OT=0.76
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????======================================================================================================================================================
> 
> ?????2012-03-26T05:14:57 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78",14 ?0.82",14 ?0.77",16 ?0.91",10 ????0 ???0.80" ?-- ?????3.2 ??- ???14.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:16:24 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????0.65", 4 ?0.63", 6 ?0.55", 4 ?0.86",13 ????1 ???0.73" 0.77" ??39.8 21.5 ???9.0 11.6 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.77 ?21.5 ?11.6 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-26T05:23:45 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????0.69", 6 ?0.63",13 ?0.67",15 ?1.03",16 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????30.2 ??- ???13.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:25:15 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????0.52", 9 ?0.51", 7 ?0.48", 3 ?1.02",16 ????1 ???0.70" 0.73" ??58.8 44.5 ???9.5 11.3 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?33.0 ?11.4 ?OT=0.76
> ?????2012-03-26T05:27:21 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 5 ?0.63",10 ?0.61",10 ?0.93",15 ????0 ???0.71" ?-- ????23.5 ??- ????9.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:28:46 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.77", 6 ?0.62",10 ?0.58",12 ?0.96",14 ????0 ???0.74" 0.72" ??39.6 31.6 ??10.7 10.1 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?32.5 ?11.0 ?OT=0.75
> ?????2012-03-26T05:30:46 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84",10 ?0.80",14 ?0.74",17 ?0.81",14 ????1 ???0.79" ?-- ?????3.8 ??- ???13.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> ?????2012-03-26T05:32:12 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.76", 8 ?0.68",16 ?0.66",12 ?0.93",17 ????0 ???0.75" 0.77" ??18.9 11.3 ??12.4 12.9 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?27.2 ?11.5 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-26T05:34:15 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.71", 6 ?0.61", 9 ?0.62", 7 ?1.07",20 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ????33.4 ??- ????9.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:35:44 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.66", 6 ?0.58",10 ?0.58", 6 ?0.99",20 ????0 ???0.71" 0.72" ??35.7 34.5 ???9.9 ?9.7 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?28.7 ?11.1 ?OT=0.75
> ?????2012-03-26T05:37:47 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????0.71", 6 ?0.61",11 ?0.56", 9 ?0.77",14 ????0 ???0.69" ?-- ????29.9 ??- ???10.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:39:15 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????0.68", 4 ?0.57", 8 ?0.57", 6 ?1.00",22 ????1 ???0.71" 0.70" ??40.2 35.1 ???9.5 10.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?29.7 ?10.9 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-26T05:41:21 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73", 8 ?0.70",14 ?0.65", 9 ?0.92",19 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ????18.5 ??- ???11.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:42:49 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75", 6 ?0.70",11 ?0.63", 8 ?0.80",13 ????0 ???0.72" 0.73" ??18.7 18.6 ??10.1 10.8 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?28.2 ?10.9 ?OT=0.76
> ?????2012-03-26T05:44:52 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 6 ?0.56", 9 ?0.56", 8 ?0.88",16 ????0 ???0.66" ?-- ????34.3 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:46:21 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.63", 6 ?0.53",10 ?0.51", 7 ?0.90",20 ????1 ???0.65" 0.66" ??40.0 37.2 ???9.5 ?9.6 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.73 ?29.3 ?10.7 ?OT=0.68
> ?????2012-03-26T05:52:44 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????0.73",14 ?0.74",17 ?0.60",11 ?0.68", 9 ????0 ???0.71" ?-- ????14.2 ??- ???13.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:54:13 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????0.59", 5 ?0.51", 7 ?0.47", 6 ?0.92",18 ????1 ???0.65" 0.68" ??50.5 32.4 ???9.3 11.2 ?????????A ?D ?B ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?29.6 ?10.8 ?OT=0.70
> ?????2012-03-26T05:56:23 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 7 ?0.65",12 ?0.56", 6 ?0.82",12 ????0 ???0.70" ?-- ????23.8 ??- ????9.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T05:57:53 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 8 ?0.66",13 ?0.59", 8 ?0.82",11 ????0 ???0.70" 0.70" ??23.1 23.4 ??10.5 10.1 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?29.0 ?10.7 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-26T05:59:55 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????0.67", 4 ?0.54", 8 ?0.51", 6 ?0.86",16 ????0 ???0.66" ?-- ????39.5 ??- ????8.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:01:20 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????0.65", 4 ?0.55", 8 ?0.50", 8 ?0.92",15 ????1 ???0.68" 0.67" ??45.1 42.3 ???9.4 ?9.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?30.2 ?10.6 ?OT=0.69
> ?????2012-03-26T06:03:28 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????0.62", 9 ?0.64",10 ?0.60", 9 ?0.89",10 ????0 ???0.70" ?-- ????26.1 ??- ???10.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:04:54 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????0.63", 6 ?0.58",10 ?0.56", 7 ?0.91",14 ????0 ???0.69" 0.69" ??32.6 29.3 ???9.4 ?9.7 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?30.1 ?10.5 ?OT=0.72
> ?????2012-03-26T06:07:02 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????0.75",13 ?0.74",14 ?0.72",12 ?0.76",10 ????0 ???0.74" ?-- ?????2.2 ??- ???12.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:08:31 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????0.90",16 ?0.90",14 ?0.81",13 ?0.78", 6 ????0 ???0.84" 0.79" ???1.8 ?2.0 ??13.5 12.8 ?????????A ?A ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?28.0 ?10.7 ?OT=0.82
> ?????2012-03-26T06:10:39 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????0.76",11 ?0.78",16 ?0.70",10 ?0.80", 9 ????1 ???0.76" ?-- ?????6.9 ??- ???12.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> ?????2012-03-26T06:12:05 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????0.74", 3 ?0.64", 7 ?0.59", 5 ?0.87",12 ????0 ???0.72" 0.74" ??27.6 17.3 ???7.8 10.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.2 ?10.6 ?OT=0.77
> ?????2012-03-26T06:14:13 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????0.78",12 ?0.72",14 ?0.60",10 ?0.83",12 ????0 ???0.73" ?-- ????20.3 ??- ???11.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:15:38 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????0.61", 5 ?0.58", 8 ?0.53", 6 ?0.93",19 ????0 ???0.68" 0.71" ??37.1 28.7 ???9.2 10.4 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.3 ?10.6 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-26T06:17:46 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????0.64", 8 ?0.58", 8 ?0.53", 5 ?0.95",16 ????0 ???0.67" ?-- ????35.6 ??- ????9.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:19:15 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????0.60", 7 ?0.56", 7 ?0.54", 7 ?0.91",15 ????0 ???0.66" 0.67" ??32.6 34.1 ???8.9 ?9.3 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.72 ?27.7 ?10.5 ?OT=0.69
> ?????2012-03-26T06:21:26 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????0.70", 8 ?0.66", 9 ?0.59", 7 ?0.77",15 ????0 ???0.68" ?-- ????16.9 ??- ????9.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T06:22:51 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????0.69",11 ?0.62",13 ?0.61", 7 ?0.82",14 ????0 ???0.67" 0.68" ??19.1 18.0 ??10.7 ?9.9 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??0.71 ?27.2 ?10.5 ?OT=0.70
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????=============================================================================================================================================================
> 
> 
> ?????2012-03-26T08:05:55 ?635774 ?r_SDSS ???????0.69", 7 ?0.65", 4 ?0.66", 4 ?1.16",17 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????28.0 ??- ????6.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:07:24 ?635774 ?r_SDSS ???????0.69", 7 ?0.66", 3 ?0.68", 3 ?1.28",20 ????1 ???0.78" 0.77" ??30.8 29.4 ???6.2 ?6.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.77 ?29.4 ?6.2 ?OT=0.75
> ?????2012-03-26T08:09:28 ?635777 ?r_SDSS ???????0.82",11 ?0.77", 8 ?0.69", 5 ?1.05",12 ????0 ???0.79" ?-- ????16.9 ??- ????6.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:10:54 ?635777 ?r_SDSS ???????0.96",16 ?0.90", 9 ?0.76", 6 ?0.94", 8 ????0 ???0.85" 0.82" ???5.9 11.4 ???7.9 ?7.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.79 ?20.4 ?6.8 ?OT=0.80
> ?????2012-03-26T08:13:02 ?635780 ?r_SDSS ???????0.81",11 ?0.75", 7 ?0.66", 7 ?0.99",10 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????14.1 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:14:30 ?635780 ?r_SDSS ???????0.74",12 ?0.71", 8 ?0.62", 6 ?1.02",10 ????0 ???0.72" 0.73" ??18.8 16.5 ???7.1 ?7.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.77 ?19.1 ?6.9 ?OT=0.72
> ?????2012-03-26T08:16:38 ?635783 ?r_SDSS ???????0.88",17 ?0.83",11 ?0.61", 7 ?0.95",11 ????0 ???0.76" ?-- ????11.6 ??- ????9.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:18:04 ?635783 ?r_SDSS ???????0.80",15 ?0.75",10 ?0.61", 7 ?1.02",13 ????0 ???0.75" 0.76" ??17.6 14.6 ???8.8 ?9.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.77 ?18.0 ?7.4 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-26T08:20:12 ?635786 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67",12 ?0.63", 7 ?0.57", 6 ?1.12",14 ????0 ???0.70" ?-- ????29.2 ??- ????7.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:21:37 ?635786 ?r_SDSS ???????0.80",10 ?0.73", 7 ?0.68", 5 ?1.07",13 ????0 ???0.78" 0.74" ??20.3 24.8 ???6.9 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?19.3 ?7.4 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-26T08:23:41 ?635789 ?r_SDSS ???????0.71",10 ?0.68", 7 ?0.67", 6 ?1.17",16 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????25.9 ??- ????7.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:25:11 ?635789 ?r_SDSS ???????0.73",11 ?0.70", 6 ?0.68", 6 ?1.05",14 ????0 ???0.76" 0.77" ??19.9 22.9 ???6.9 ?7.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?19.9 ?7.4 ?OT=0.75
> ?????2012-03-26T08:27:13 ?635792 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67", 6 ?0.63", 4 ?0.66", 3 ?1.21",19 ????0 ???0.76" ?-- ????30.1 ??- ????6.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:28:38 ?635792 ?r_SDSS ???????0.69", 8 ?0.65", 5 ?0.64", 4 ?1.15",17 ????0 ???0.75" 0.76" ??28.2 29.2 ???6.5 ?6.6 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?21.2 ?7.3 ?OT=0.74
> ?????2012-03-26T08:30:44 ?635795 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67", 7 ?0.66", 6 ?0.65", 5 ?1.21",17 ????0 ???0.75" ?-- ????27.3 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:32:09 ?635795 ?r_SDSS ???????0.60", 7 ?0.59", 4 ?0.60", 3 ?1.28",18 ????0 ???0.72" 0.73" ??35.5 31.4 ???6.5 ?6.8 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?22.5 ?7.2 ?OT=0.72
> ?????2012-03-26T08:37:25 ?635798 ?r_SDSS ???????0.57", 4 ?0.55", 4 ?0.54", 3 ?1.12",16 ????0 ???0.67" ?-- ????37.8 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:38:54 ?635798 ?r_SDSS ???????0.67", 8 ?0.70", 7 ?0.65", 6 ?0.93",12 ????0 ???0.72" 0.70" ??13.4 25.6 ???6.4 ?6.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?22.9 ?7.1 ?OT=0.68
> ?????2012-03-26T08:40:55 ?635801 ?r_SDSS ???????0.54", 3 ?0.54", 4 ?0.58", 3 ?1.42",23 ????1 ???0.71" ?-- ????43.8 ??- ????6.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(635773) 
> ?????2012-03-26T08:42:20 ?635801 ?r_SDSS ???????0.49", 4 ?0.50", 4 ?0.55", 4 ?1.44",23 ????1 ???0.70" 0.70" ??48.5 46.1 ???7.2 ?7.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?25.2 ?7.1 ?OT=0.69
> ?????2012-03-26T08:44:20 ?635804 ?r_SDSS ???????0.56", 7 ?0.57", 4 ?0.60", 4 ?1.13",16 ????0 ???0.68" ?-- ????28.5 ??- ????6.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:45:49 ?635804 ?r_SDSS ???????0.50", 3 ?0.51", 4 ?0.55", 3 ?1.41",23 ????1 ???0.68" 0.68" ??46.0 37.3 ???7.3 ?6.9 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?26.3 ?7.1 ?OT=0.67
> ?????2012-03-26T08:47:47 ?635807 ?r_SDSS ???????0.57", 4 ?0.56", 4 ?0.60", 3 ?1.33",22 ????1 ???0.72" ?-- ????40.1 ??- ????6.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(635773) 
> ?????2012-03-26T08:49:15 ?635807 ?r_SDSS ???????0.61", 3 ?0.62", 5 ?0.67", 4 ?1.34",19 ????0 ???0.76" 0.74" ??33.1 36.6 ???7.3 ?7.1 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?27.1 ?7.1 ?OT=0.73
> ?????2012-03-26T08:51:18 ?635810 ?r_SDSS ???????0.57", 4 ?0.56", 4 ?0.61", 4 ?1.38",20 ????0 ???0.72" ?-- ????39.7 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:52:43 ?635810 ?r_SDSS ???????0.58", 2 ?0.58", 6 ?0.62", 5 ?1.39",20 ????1 ???0.75" 0.73" ??38.9 39.3 ???7.5 ?7.0 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.74 ?28.1 ?7.1 ?OT=0.72
> ?????2012-03-26T08:54:47 ?635813 ?r_SDSS ???????0.83", 3 ?0.81", 3 ?0.86", 3 ?1.26",14 ????0 ???0.91" ?-- ????18.5 ??- ????5.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:56:16 ?635813 ?r_SDSS ???????0.86", 4 ?0.87", 4 ?0.89", 3 ?1.27",15 ????0 ???0.95" 0.93" ??15.7 17.1 ???5.4 ?5.3 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.75 ?27.3 ?7.0 ?OT=0.91
> ?????2012-03-26T08:58:30 ?635816 ?r_SDSS ???????0.79", 4 ?0.84", 4 ?0.90", 3 ?1.38",17 ????0 ???0.95" ?-- ????16.7 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T08:59:56 ?635816 ?r_SDSS ???????0.72", 4 ?0.73", 4 ?0.76", 4 ?1.13",13 ????0 ???0.81" 0.88" ??17.6 17.1 ???5.3 ?5.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?26.6 ?6.9 ?OT=0.86
> ?????2012-03-26T09:02:09 ?635819 ?r_SDSS ???????0.68", 4 ?0.68", 4 ?0.70", 5 ?1.17",14 ????0 ???0.77" ?-- ????21.3 ??- ????5.8 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(635773) ?
> ?????2012-03-26T09:03:34 ?635819 ?r_SDSS ???????0.64", 5 ?0.66", 6 ?0.66", 5 ?1.14",15 ????0 ???0.74" 0.76" ??22.0 21.7 ???6.4 ?6.1 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(635773) ???1.4 ??0.76 ?26.3 ?6.8 ?OT=0.74
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????=========================================================================================================================================================
> 
> 
> 
> ??03/27/12 05:17:40 ????vst
> ?????As requested by S. Mieske I'm adding more OBs with IQ degradation. 
> ?????Regards
> ?????Carlos
> ?????The following is from 2012/03/22 night
> ?????===============================================================================================================================================
> ?????2012-03-23T06:33:03 ?736830 ?NB_659 ???????1.17",15 ?0.95", 6 ?0.93", 7 ?1.00", 9 ????0 ???1.01" ?-- ????13.5 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:35:48 ?736830 ?NB_659 ???????1.11",16 ?0.90", 7 ?0.92", 6 ?1.01", 6 ????0 ???0.98" ?-- ????13.2 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:38:31 ?736830 ?NB_659 ???????1.02",14 ?0.83", 7 ?0.84", 7 ?0.89", 9 ????0 ???0.89" 0.96" ??12.5 13.0 ???8.0 ?8.0 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??0.96 ?13.0 ?8.0 ?OT=0.91
> ?????2012-03-23T06:42:40 ?736833 ?NB_659 ???????1.22",16 ?0.85", 6 ?0.89", 6 ?1.00", 6 ????0 ???1.00" ?-- ????24.9 ??- ????8.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:45:24 ?736833 ?NB_659 ???????1.26",10 ?1.07",10 ?1.07", 9 ?1.12", 8 ????0 ???1.13" ?-- ????10.3 ??- ????9.0 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:48:08 ?736833 ?NB_659 ???????1.26",15 ?1.02", 5 ?1.05", 5 ?1.17", 5 ????0 ???1.11" 1.08" ??15.6 16.9 ???7.4 ?8.4 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.02 ?15.0 ?8.2 ?OT=1.02
> ?????2012-03-23T06:51:24 ?736836 ?NB_659 ???????1.20", 8 ?1.08", 4 ?1.11", 5 ?1.17", 5 ????0 ???1.14" ?-- ?????7.8 ??- ????5.5 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:54:08 ?736836 ?NB_659 ???????1.24",14 ?0.96", 4 ?0.99", 5 ?1.07", 4 ????0 ???1.06" ?-- ????15.9 ??- ????6.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T06:56:51 ?736836 ?NB_659 ???????1.33",13 ?1.17", 4 ?1.21", 7 ?1.23", 7 ????0 ???1.23" 1.14" ???7.5 10.4 ???6.7 ?6.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.06 ?13.4 ?7.5 ?OT=1.07
> ?????2012-03-23T07:03:27 ?736839 ?r_SDSS ???????1.14",12 ?0.94", 8 ?0.99",11 ?1.09",14 ????0 ???1.02" ?-- ?????9.8 ??- ????9.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T07:04:37 ?736839 ?r_SDSS ???????1.15",12 ?0.98", 6 ?1.00", 7 ?1.04",12 ????0 ???1.02" 1.02" ???5.0 ?7.4 ???7.7 ?8.6 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.05 ?11.9 ?7.8 ?OT=0.95
> ?????2012-03-23T07:06:20 ?736842 ?r_SDSS ???????1.29", 6 ?1.28",10 ?1.35",13 ?1.45",14 ????0 ???1.32" ?-- ?????2.5 ??- ????9.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T07:07:29 ?736842 ?r_SDSS ???????1.12", 6 ?0.99", 8 ?1.05", 6 ?1.10", 8 ????0 ???1.04" 1.18" ???6.0 ?4.2 ???6.3 ?8.1 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.08 ?10.4 ?7.8 ?OT=1.09
> ?????2012-03-23T07:09:11 ?736845 ?r_SDSS ???????1.43",17 ?1.21", 9 ?1.24",10 ?1.24",12 ????0 ???1.26" ?-- ?????5.4 ??- ???10.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(736829) ?
> ?????2012-03-23T07:10:20 ?736845 ?r_SDSS ???????1.18",11 ?0.96", 8 ?1.03",10 ?1.10",12 ????0 ???1.06" 1.16" ??12.5 ?9.0 ???9.1 10.0 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.09 ?10.2 ?8.2 ?OT=1.08
> ?????2012-03-23T07:15:09 ?736848 ?i_SDSS ???????1.23",21 ?0.71", 8 ?0.74",10 ?0.79", 8 ????1 ???0.88" ?-- ????33.9 ??- ???10.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736829) 
> ?????2012-03-23T07:16:20 ?736848 ?i_SDSS ???????1.14",20 ?0.71", 4 ?0.79", 6 ?0.81", 7 ????0 ???0.86" 0.87" ??26.3 30.1 ???7.8 ?9.2 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.06 ?13.0 ?8.3 ?OT=0.84
> ?????2012-03-23T07:18:08 ?736851 ?i_SDSS ???????1.17",21 ?0.87", 8 ?0.88",11 ?0.93",11 ????1 ???0.95" ?-- ????15.8 ??- ???11.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736829) 
> ?????2012-03-23T07:19:13 ?736851 ?i_SDSS ???????1.04",12 ?0.85",11 ?0.92",13 ?1.01",16 ????0 ???0.94" 0.94" ??10.0 12.9 ??11.6 11.3 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.04 ?13.0 ?8.7 ?OT=0.91
> ?????2012-03-23T07:20:54 ?736854 ?i_SDSS ???????1.20",21 ?0.81", 7 ?0.93",11 ?0.91", 9 ????1 ???0.95" ?-- ????18.0 ??- ???10.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(736829) 
> ?????2012-03-23T07:22:03 ?736854 ?i_SDSS ???????1.35",18 ?0.88", 8 ?0.90", 9 ?0.99",10 ????1 ???1.03" 0.99" ??27.5 22.7 ??11.5 10.8 ?????????A ?B ?B ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(736829) ???1.2 ??1.04 ?14.1 ?9.0 ?OT=0.95
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! C !!!
> ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!! Concatenation has >10% with bad image degradation. Give at least one OB a C !!!
> ?????===================================================================================================================================================
> ??03/27/12 07:01:53 ????vst
> ?????Hi, 
> ?????During the execution of OBID 607044. The AO stars were selected by hand and they were center OK. But during exposure #2 they started to drift.
> ?????So Coma increased a lot and guiding was lost.
> 
> ?????While the 3th exposure was running, I selected 2 new AO stars.
> ?????The files are:
> ?????ocmia.1813.fits
> ?????ocmia.1813.fits
> ?????ocmia.1814.fits
> ?????ocmia.1815.fits
> ?????ocmia.1817.fits
> 
> ?????under DETDATA at wocam
> ?????Regards
> ?????Carlos
> ??03/27/12 09:45:56 ????vst
> ?????Hi, 
> ?????The following is the Tech downtime per night since 22/03/2012 
> 
> ?????22/03/2012->00:52
> ?????23/03/2012->03:49
> ?????24/03/2012->01:15
> ?????25/03/2012->04:05
> ?????26/03/2012->02:38
> 
> ?????Total ?Tech Downtime= 12:36
> ?????Regards
> ?????Carlos
> ??03/27/12 10:50:17 ????smieske
> ?????As discussed with Carlos, the amount of OBs with IQ degradation is much higher than normal, and occurs in both open and closed loop. Therefore our interpretation is that there is something else happening, than just the typical occasional defocus. And hence we assign this as technical downtime until clarified. Does everything look normal at the phyiscal telescope/instrument interface? Is the AG/IA integration time OK (20-30s)?
> 
> ?????Thanks,
> ?????Steffen
> ??03/28/12 03:12:38 ????vst
> ?????HI:During this night I started with KIDS OBs and I got much ellipticity. and also image degradation
> ?????First of all always the automatic mode failed to acquire guiding and when doing it manually, the guide stars availables were not coincident with trhe red circles that shows well known ?catalogue guide stars. Then after every exposure the guiding was lost. Another strange behavior is related with IA stars. IA stars also were always selected manually and most of the time were stars far away from catalogue points (red circles) While the observation was running I could clearly see that the IA stars in the patch started to drift ending at a very corner of the square patch.
> ?????As a result of this images on science rtd were elongated most of the time.
> ?????Please consider this in your analysis.
> ?????Thanks
> ?????NJI
> ??03/28/12 04:26:03 ????smieske
> ?????Adding 01:04 for OB 607044 from night March 26/27 to downtime.
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/28/12 04:28:41 ????smieske
> ?????Adding 01:04 for OB 607044 from night March 26/27 to downtime.
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/28/12 04:35:35 ????smieske
> ?????Can somebody please look at this problem. Some issue with tracking or M2 motion? We are loosing several hours per night.
> ??03/28/12 11:11:11 ????sguisard
> ?????Sorry,
> 
> ?????No clue nor knowledge about this system. ?I prefer to reassign to the person who did the commissioning and acceptance of it for a quicker analysis and asolution.
> ?????If he needs specific help from Optics he can contact us.
> 
> ?????Stephane
> 
> ?????Assignee changed: tszeifer 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: sguisard 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 11:11:10 
> ?????Assignee changed: tszeifer 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: sguisard 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 11:11:10 
> ??03/28/12 12:59:04 ????smieske
> ?????Dear all,
> 
> ?????copy&paste of email from Pietro. I take the freedom to reassign to SW. Can you please have a look whether the pointing model parameters are currently applied. If you find that everything is OK, you can reassign to Thomas/myself.
> 
> ?????Cheers,
> ?????Steffen
> 
> 
> ?????Dear Steffen,
> 
> ?????I would also check the pointing model parameters loaded in the 3 LCUs (ltvaz, ltvalt, ltvadc).
> ?????The model is certainly still good, but we should check if it is currently applied.
> ?????The parameters are loaded from WS side, with the same VLT sw. ?An useful command might be GETTERM -> aztrkServer (or alttrkServer, rottrkServer).
> 
> ?????2-3 times I experienced that these parameters were not loaded correctly and the pointing became suddenly poor. The reason was that, if I remember well, the parameters are loaded only when the ws software (trkws) is initialized. If one LCU is not ready to receive the parameters (e.g. because it is switched off or is rebooting) in that moment, maybe afterward that axis will work without any pointing model. If you are in such conditions the automatic selection of guide stars will certainly fail and the stars will drift more than usual.
> 
> ?????If that is the case, the most radical way to recover should be:
> ?????1) reboot the 3 LCUs,
> ?????2) check the parameters on the 3 LCUs (I think they should be all 0)
> ?????3) send INIT - ONLINE to trkws
> ?????4) check the pointing model parameters again on the 3 LCUs.
> 
> ?????Anyway I would ask TCS staff in Paranal to perform this check.
> 
> ?????Hope this helps...
> 
> ?????Cheers,
> ?????Pietro
> 
> ?????PS:
> ?????- I would exclude any M2 motion
> ?????- of course if the stars in the IA boxes are drifting the IA will be poor and AO corrections ?will be bad
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Software 
> ?????Modified By: smieske 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 12:59:04 
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Software 
> ?????Modified By: smieske 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 12:59:04 
> ??03/28/12 13:58:04 ????ikastine
> ?????wtvst vstmgr:~ 1001 > msgSend ltvalt alttrkServer GETTERM ""
> ?????MESSAGEBUFFER:
> ?????ACEC: 0.000000,*ACES: 1.440000,*AN: -6.710000,*AW: -43.660000,*CA: 46.690000,ECEC: 0.000000,ECES: 0.000000,*IA: -250.220000,*IE: -359.340000,*NPAE: -0.190000,NRX: 0.000000,NRY: 0.000000,*TF: -37.500000,*TX: -3.190000
> 
> ?????MESSAGEBUFFER:
> ?????ACEC: 0.000000,*ACES: 1.440000,*AN: -6.710000,*AW: -43.660000,*CA: 46.690000,ECEC: 0.000000,ECES: 0.000000,*IA: -250.220000,*IE: -359.340000,*NPAE: -0.190000,NRX: 0.000000,NRY: 0.000000,*TF: -37.500000,*TX: -3.190000
> ?????wtvst vstmgr:~ 1003 > 
> 
> ?????wtvst vstmgr:~ 1003 > msgSend ltvadc rottrkServer GETTERM ""
> ?????MESSAGEBUFFER:
> ?????ACEC: 0.000000,*ACES: 1.440000,*AN: -6.710000,*AW: -43.660000,*CA: 46.690000,ECEC: 0.000000,ECES: 0.000000,*IA: -250.220000,*IE: -359.340000,*NPAE: -0.190000,NRX: 0.000000,NRY: 0.000000,*TF: -37.500000,*TX: -3.190000
> 
> 
> ?????Terms with "*" before them means that they are currently used by tracking. This means that axes are using same pointing model, so no problem in this side.
> ?????Note: as this IQ degration was reported after probe SW/HW was taken from simulation, we put back it simualtion (after talking with Sergio) if this make some difference tonight. 
> ?????Assignee changed: smieske 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: ikastine 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 13:58:04 
> ?????Assignee changed: smieske 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: ikastine 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-28 13:58:04 
> ??03/28/12 20:22:37 ????rparra
> ?????Tracking checked on daytime. Position error curves (az, alt, rot) during tracking ?don't differ from the ones measured previously.
> ?????In order to try to come back to the conditions before March 22nd and trying to discard possible failure factors, I disconnected the pickup mirror cable, in addition to the action of putting it on simulation.
> ??03/29/12 09:25:53 ????vst
> ?????2012-03-29
> 
> ?????Tonight i had degradation, here is some of them:
> 
> 
> ?????2012-03-29T07:37:47 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????1.06", 4 ?1.18", 6 ?1.12", 7 ?1.44",12 ????0 ???1.18" ?-- ?????8.9 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T07:39:14 ?639814 ?z_SDSS ???????1.06", 4 ?1.14", 3 ?1.17", 7 ?1.37",12 ????0 ???1.18" 1.18" ???4.3 ?6.6 ???6.6 ?7.3 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.18 ?6.6 ?7.3 ?OT=1.19
> ?????2012-03-29T07:41:17 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????1.04", 5 ?1.04", 4 ?1.04", 5 ?1.28",12 ????0 ???1.11" ?-- ????12.1 ??- ????7.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T07:42:45 ?639817 ?z_SDSS ???????0.99", 4 ?1.05", 4 ?1.02", 5 ?1.31",14 ????0 ???1.09" 1.10" ??10.9 11.5 ???7.0 ?7.5 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.14 ?9.0 ?7.4 ?OT=1.11
> ?????2012-03-29T07:44:46 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.84", 5 ?0.82", 4 ?0.85", 4 ?1.31",18 ????0 ???0.96" ?-- ????24.4 ??- ????7.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T07:46:15 ?639820 ?z_SDSS ???????0.81", 5 ?0.82", 4 ?0.90", 6 ?1.32",16 ????1 ???0.96" 0.96" ??19.6 22.0 ???8.3 ?7.8 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.08 ?13.4 ?7.5 ?OT=0.97
> ?????2012-03-29T07:48:11 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.87", 6 ?0.80", 3 ?0.83", 5 ?1.35",17 ????1 ???0.97" ?-- ????31.8 ??- ????8.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> ?????2012-03-29T07:49:37 ?639823 ?z_SDSS ???????0.86", 6 ?0.75", 4 ?0.79", 5 ?1.52",24 ????2 ???0.96" 0.96" ??41.8 36.8 ???9.9 ?9.2 ?????????A ?D ?A ?A ?A ?A ????D ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.05 ?19.2 ?8.0 ?OT=0.97
> ?????2012-03-29T07:56:32 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.95", 5 ?0.87", 5 ?0.88", 4 ?1.26",15 ????1 ???1.00" ?-- ????27.1 ??- ????8.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?B ?- ?- ?- ????B ?????(639813) 
> ?????2012-03-29T07:58:02 ?639826 ?z_SDSS ???????0.88", 5 ?0.83", 5 ?0.82", 5 ?1.22",17 ????1 ???0.95" 0.97" ??25.5 26.3 ???8.3 ?8.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?20.6 ?8.0 ?OT=0.98
> ?????2012-03-29T08:00:09 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????0.90", 5 ?0.93", 4 ?0.95", 4 ?1.32",17 ????0 ???1.03" ?-- ????16.3 ??- ????7.2 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:01:34 ?639829 ?z_SDSS ???????1.10", 6 ?1.08", 4 ?1.07", 4 ?1.40",15 ????0 ???1.14" 1.08" ??13.2 14.7 ???7.1 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?19.6 ?7.9 ?OT=1.09
> ?????2012-03-29T08:03:42 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.94", 7 ?0.95", 4 ?0.94", 5 ?1.23",13 ????0 ???1.01" ?-- ????13.0 ??- ????6.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:05:08 ?639832 ?z_SDSS ???????0.93", 5 ?0.95", 4 ?0.94", 6 ?1.29",13 ????0 ???1.02" 1.02" ??16.7 14.8 ???7.9 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?19.0 ?7.8 ?OT=1.02
> ?????2012-03-29T08:07:17 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.98", 9 ?0.91", 5 ?0.91", 3 ?1.23",15 ????0 ???0.99" ?-- ????16.5 ??- ????8.3 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:08:46 ?639835 ?z_SDSS ???????0.85", 8 ?0.92", 6 ?0.88", 6 ?1.13",13 ????0 ???0.93" 0.96" ???8.9 12.7 ???9.0 ?8.7 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.03 ?18.2 ?7.9 ?OT=0.96
> ?????2012-03-29T08:14:48 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????1.02", 7 ?1.09", 5 ?1.02", 6 ?1.22", 7 ????0 ???1.09" ?-- ?????7.2 ??- ????6.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:16:14 ?639838 ?z_SDSS ???????0.94", 7 ?0.96", 4 ?0.97", 6 ?1.32",16 ????0 ???1.04" 1.06" ??12.9 10.0 ???7.7 ?7.2 ?????????A ?B ?A ?A ?A ?A ????B ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.03 ?17.3 ?7.8 ?OT=1.07
> ?????2012-03-29T08:18:19 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????1.02", 4 ?0.99", 4 ?1.01", 4 ?1.23",11 ????0 ???1.06" ?-- ????10.0 ??- ????6.4 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:19:48 ?639841 ?z_SDSS ???????1.01", 5 ?1.03", 4 ?0.99", 3 ?1.24",12 ????0 ???1.06" 1.06" ???9.3 ?9.6 ???5.5 ?6.0 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?16.5 ?7.6 ?OT=1.06
> ?????2012-03-29T08:21:59 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????0.98", 6 ?1.02", 5 ?0.99", 3 ?1.16", 9 ????0 ???1.02" ?-- ?????4.4 ??- ????5.6 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:23:24 ?639844 ?z_SDSS ???????1.06", 4 ?1.03", 5 ?1.00", 6 ?1.17", 8 ????0 ???1.05" 1.04" ???6.7 ?5.6 ???5.8 ?5.7 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?15.5 ?7.5 ?OT=1.04
> ?????2012-03-29T08:25:34 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????1.08", 6 ?1.11", 5 ?1.04", 4 ?1.19",12 ????0 ???1.09" ?-- ?????4.5 ??- ????6.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:27:02 ?639847 ?z_SDSS ???????0.99", 6 ?1.07", 3 ?1.02", 5 ?1.16", 8 ????0 ???1.06" 1.08" ???1.8 ?3.2 ???5.6 ?5.8 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.04 ?14.5 ?7.3 ?OT=1.08
> ?????2012-03-29T08:29:13 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????1.05", 7 ?1.16", 4 ?1.05", 4 ?1.19", 8 ????0 ???1.10" ?-- ?????2.3 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:30:42 ?639850 ?z_SDSS ???????1.11", 5 ?1.19", 5 ?1.11", 4 ?1.17", 7 ????0 ???1.14" 1.12" ???2.1 ?2.2 ???6.0 ?6.0 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.05 ?13.5 ?7.2 ?OT=1.12
> ?????2012-03-29T08:32:53 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????1.11", 6 ?1.17", 5 ?1.14", 4 ?1.29", 7 ????0 ???1.16" ?-- ?????2.0 ??- ????5.9 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:34:19 ?639853 ?z_SDSS ???????1.26", 4 ?1.25", 5 ?1.25", 6 ?1.36", 5 ????0 ???1.27" 1.21" ???3.4 ?2.7 ???5.3 ?5.6 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.06 ?12.8 ?7.1 ?OT=1.22
> ?????2012-03-29T08:36:26 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????1.09", 5 ?1.10", 5 ?1.12", 9 ?1.22", 5 ????0 ???1.15" ?-- ?????6.1 ??- ????7.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:37:52 ?639856 ?z_SDSS ???????1.20", 6 ?1.23", 6 ?1.23", 6 ?1.35", 6 ????0 ???1.25" 1.20" ???4.2 ?5.2 ???6.5 ?6.8 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.07 ?12.3 ?7.1 ?OT=1.20
> ?????2012-03-29T08:40:32 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????1.24", 5 ?1.26", 6 ?1.17", 5 ?1.28", 6 ????0 ???1.21" ?-- ?????2.8 ??- ????6.1 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:42:01 ?639859 ?z_SDSS ???????1.10", 3 ?1.17", 7 ?1.17", 7 ?1.33", 8 ????0 ???1.18" 1.19" ???2.5 ?2.6 ???6.9 ?6.5 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.08 ?11.7 ?7.0 ?OT=1.20
> ?????2012-03-29T08:44:07 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????1.16", 5 ?1.14", 4 ?1.14", 4 ?1.32",10 ????0 ???1.18" ?-- ?????5.6 ??- ????5.7 ??- ??????????- ?- ?- ?- ?- ?- ????- ?????(639813) ?
> ?????2012-03-29T08:45:34 ?639862 ?z_SDSS ???????1.12", 4 ?1.12", 4 ?1.10", 4 ?1.28", 8 ????0 ???1.16" 1.17" ???7.2 ?6.4 ???5.2 ?5.5 ?????????A ?A ?A ?A ?A ?A ????A ?????(639813) ???1.4 ??1.08 ?11.3 ?6.9 ?OT=1.17
> 
> ?????I also took some plots to the rotators velocity in this position and there are in vstmgr/rotatorplot.samp and vstmgr/dummy.txt
> 
> ?????But checking the behavior of these OBs the degradation its kind of random, in the sense that with AO sometimes had this problem sometimes not, and without AO same thing, also these programs are executed very close to the meridian ( half an hour after until one hour) and low airmass, but the IQ degradation get better with a higher airmass than 1.2, and i do remember that the image quality of the VST and the focus had some problems or lets say was not very good in this positions during the commissioning even after the intervention. and the magnitud of the problem was different if you use a differents filters, maybe this is the problem. So i think that a good test could be try to executed this programs below airmass 1.2 or from airmass 1.2 abnd also do the AO correction more often, now is after 5 Obs or more, maybe it will better after 3 Obs.
> 
> ?????Regards
> 
> ?????CRR
> ??03/29/12 19:15:59 ????vst
> ?????Only some defocussed corners of the field of view were showing
> ?????astigmatism (elipses pointing to the center of the field of view).
> 
> ?????- first I found that the relative filter offsets on locics1 were all
> ???????at 0 but the filter offsets are read from wocins (can't cause
> ???????problems)
> 
> ?????- I can exclude that the M1 shape (high oder aberration) can cause the
> ?????problem.
> 
> ?????- I exclude rotation.
> 
> ?????- It can be tilt in M1 or M2:
> 
> ???????- M2 tilt configuration parameters were checked (214.56,-369.90).
> 
> ???????- there was a M2 error reported in PPRS-044431. The image quality
> ???????degradation coinsidently started at the same time (about on 
> ???????March 22 UT 01h)
> 
> 
> ?????=> I'd strongly suggest to investigate M2 PMAC, positions,... 
> ?????reboot (initialize) M2 unit after M2 error (possibly steps were
> ?????lost).
> 
> ?????Thomas Szeifert
> 
> ?????Assignee changed: rparra 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Electronic 
> ?????Modified By: vst 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-29 19:15:59 
> ?????Assignee changed: rparra 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Electronic 
> ?????Modified By: vst 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-03-29 19:15:59 
> ??03/29/12 20:06:54 ????vst
> ?????M2 problems of last week discarded - the M2 was rebooted yesterday according to Ricardo Parra. TSz
> ??03/30/12 02:59:29 ????vst
> ?????The pointing was 35 arcseconds (far away) from the expected position - according to the IA stars. At alt 66, azim. 121 Actual Rotator 56 - same size of offset in another field found later. (no automatic AG star acquisition should be used).
> 
> ?????Images quality gradients observed relatively quickly after the IA - in open loop observations. We closed the loop when the IQ degradation over the field was permanently > 10%. Required to keep a look in due time on the QC logs.
> 
> ?????TSz
> 
> 
> 
> ??03/30/12 11:42:10 ????rparra
> ?????Just a comment: In fact I didn't reboot the M2 yet, waiting for instructions from INAF on the right way to do it. There is some risk on doing the wrong way.
> ?????Now I got the answer from Pietro and would proceed accordingly.
> ??03/30/12 20:39:37 ????rparra
> ?????After R. Huerta made a backup of HCU, both, HCU and ltvm12 have been rebooted and initialized today. 
> ?????If some of their parameters were corrupted causing a mirror to be wrongly tilted, this should restore parameters to their original values.
> ??03/31/12 02:42:41 ????vst
> ?????Steffen found that the PSF anisotropy plots look far worse then in the past.
> 
> ?????I still believe in a focal plane tilt. The last item what 
> ?????was not checked is the tilt of M1 which was put as far as I remember at the start of the efforts to correct the
> ?????focal plane tilt of the telescope.
> 
> ?????Could there be something lost after the VLT-SW 2010 tests about 3 weeks ago?
> ??03/31/12 03:19:30 ????vst
> ?????Pointing offset is about 23" tonight. (110-120 pixel), almost as large as yesterday. Therefore, automatic IA/GS selection cannot be done. Such a systematic offset seems consistent with the hypothesis of a small tilt....
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/31/12 03:29:57 ????vst
> ?????Final note for today: the 'tilt' effect is strong around the meridian, and weaker at higher airmass. This has always been the case qualitatively, but is more pronounced now. I will send around a few anisotropy plots.
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/31/12 16:29:20 ????vst
> ?????PPRS 44590 created for night March 30/31 for another 01:40 loss due to degradation. That loss is logged in the PPRS 44590.
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/31/12 16:37:26 ????vst
> ?????I add the 01:20 (corrected) downtime of PPRS 44590 here, and put 0 downtime to PPRS 44590
> ?????-Steffen
> ??03/31/12 16:52:48 ????rparra
> ?????Today, according to Pietro's suggestion, ALT, AZ and ROT lcu's were rebooted, initialized and Pointing model applied.
> ?????Main mirror fixed points positions have been checked and found OK.
> ?????Probe has been connected back and ?enabled in order to allow the test suggested by Pietro : "I would check the pointing model presetting a star and putting the probe in the center of the field. If presetting several stars, the pointing is visually very bad or even you cannot see the stars in the TCCD window, there is definitely something wrong".
> ??04/01/12 03:52:11 ????vst
> ?????I have checked the pointing offset on the telescope AG - it was as well at >30 arcsecs offset.
> 
> ?????reference pixel x,y: 197, 181
> 
> ?????at alt 56deg az 132deg rot ?42 deg:	AG offsets -29, 2 ??M2 offset delta, eps -40, 50
> ?????at alt 60deg az ?28deg rot 138 deg:	AG offsets ?14,18 ??M2 offset delta, eps -10, 50
> ?????at alt 44deg az ?85deg rot ?74 deg:	AG offsets -19,14 ??M2 offset delta, eps -25, 40
> 
> ?????Then I did a focus sequence at two rotator angles:
> 
> ?????-rw-rw-r-- ?1 archeso vlt 576567360 Apr ?1 01:09 OMEGACAM_IMG_OBS092_0001.fits
> ?????-rw-rw-r-- ?1 archeso vlt 576570240 Apr ?1 01:11 OMEGACAM_IMG_FOCUS092_0001.fits
> ?????-rw-rw-r-- ?1 archeso vlt 576567360 Apr ?1 01:19 OMEGACAM_IMG_OBS092_0003.fits
> ?????-rw-rw-r-- ?1 archeso vlt 576570240 Apr ?1 01:22 OMEGACAM_IMG_FOCUS092_0003.fits
> 
> ?????The psf anisotropy shows that the degradation rotates on the images. It's locked with the telescope.
> 
> ?????I have decided to check the image quality at the M2 tilt angle as indicated by the pointing
> ?????offset (~-25 arcsec in delta and 47 arcsec in epsilon)
> 
> ?????The focus sequence is unfotunately useless - too much out of focus.
> 
> ?????We (with Steffen) have anyway checked the PSF anisotropy and found the PSF very much improved with the
> ?????change M2 tilt angles delta and epsilon.
> 
> ?????I have change the M2 tilt on the M2 configuration GUI from (214.56, -369.90) to (189.56, -324.90)
> ?????and we continued with this configuration for the night, with a critical eye on the data.
> 
> ?????Tilt of M2 improves the problem (even though it can be as well M1 or OMEGACAM which is tilted)
> ?????Unlikely that OMEGACAM is tilted - nobody touched it. M2 has had an error/problem a week ago!!!
> 
> ?????Thomas Szeifert
> ??04/01/12 11:56:23 ????rparra
> ?????With all this additional information the ticket is reassigned to Optics.
> 
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Optical 
> ?????Modified By: rparra 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-04-01 11:56:23 
> ?????Assignee changed: ?
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Optical 
> ?????Modified By: rparra 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-04-01 11:56:23 
> ??04/02/12 12:10:52 ????rparra
> ?????I add here comments from Pietro Schipani:
> 
> ?????1) We should really be sure of when exactly this problem has started, to find out what has happened immediately before.
> ?????The earthquake happened on 19/3. No problem was signaled immediately after: we are assuming the problems started on 22/3. If the problem has been really the new INIT of M2 after the leg#3 failure, we should see a difference in the images during the 21/3 night, before and after the INIT time of the hexapod. Did somebody check it? I would start from the images (please remember I cannot access them, somebody should carefully check).
> 
> 
> ?????2) Hexapod legs errors: it had already happened very sporadically, not necessarily on leg#3. I think it is a following error > threshold for a given leg (that can be real, or "apparent" i.e. due to a wrong instantaneous reading of the encoder: we had this problem before commissioning and applied a patch to the PLC PMAC code to discard wrong values; but maybe sometimes that patch is not enough).
> ?????The recovering procedure is to execute again M2 INIT - ONLINE from the M2 panel.
> ?????I think the error occurred is not significant in the context of our discussion. If the new INIT has produced a new zero position for the M2 because something (a switch used in the INIT?) had moved in the meantime because of the earthquake (that is very unlikely, but we are doing brainstorming), the problem could have been the new INIT. But first we should demonstrate it (see previous item).
> 
> 
> ?????3) If the M2 "zero" position is now different, we should have an approximately constant offset in the telescope pointing. This might be revealed building a new pointing model and analyzing carefully the data. If you send me the pointing model output (including the error file) I am available to cross-check from here.
> ?????If you do it, before starting the procedure from the pomStart gui, please remember to compute the "center of rotation" pixel (we do it usually offsetting the rotator by 180? and computing the middle point between initial and final pixels) and overwrite the "reference pixel" value in the DB for the duration of the pointing model procedure. It is in the table:
> 
> ?????@wtvst:Appl_data:TCS:msw:insData.data( )
> 
> ?????and should be (196,178).
> ?????Afterward, restore the old value for the reference pixel (that is the pixel where the guide star has to be in order to maximize the illumination of the Shack-Hartmann too; close to the center of rotation but not perfectly coincident).
> 
> ?????As large pointing errors have been reported, I would build a new pointing model at least to compare it with the current one.
> 
> 
> ?????4) The TIOs have also talked about drifting stars:
> 
> ?????"2012-03-27 07:01:53 ??vst
> ??????????Hi,
> ??????????During the execution of OBID 607044. The AO stars were selected by hand and they were center OK. But during exposure #2 they started to drift.
> ??????????So Coma increased a lot and guiding was lost."
> 
> ?????"2012-03-28 03:12:38 ??vst
> ?????While the observation was running I could clearly see that the IA stars in the patch started to drift ending at a very corner of the square patch.
> ??????????As a result of this images on science rtd were elongated most of the time."
> 
> ?????Of course, also these things have produced a bad image quality and this looks a different problem.
> 
> ?????If autoguiding was active (I do not know) this behaviour is not normal, even though the M2 would be in another place. If it was not active, in those cases we could conclude this was not the right choice.
> ?????Please consider I do not know how the OBs were built and cannot be sure. 
> ?????I would just suggest to check how the telescope was operated and/or if autoguiding works well for all the allowed star magnitudes.
> 
> ?????In my experience with TCS autoguiding, the guide was poor with bad autoguiding control parameters (PII autoguiding controller) or because of stars too faint (depending on the combination magnitude/integration time).
> ?????I do not know how these parameters are taken into account on camera AG, so there I cannot help.
> 
> 
> ?????5) I have read the M2 was tilted and then the IQ looked to be better.
> ?????It would be fine, but there are several warnings (more specifically, there is a lot of work to do, if the alignment is changed!).
> 
> ?????5.1) ?We would change the alignment of the telescope; new tests should assess the off-axis astigmatism gets better, approximately as it should be from theory (now it should be worse, if we are suddenly in misalignment condition, although we do not know why).
> ?????We did many tests measuring the astigmatism with the Shack-Hartmann at 40 arcminutes from the center in four 90deg spaced positions (up-down-left-right) and then we post-processed the data. I can help you with the procedure.
> ??????Another parallel test is just to look at the images, but so far this can be just a qualitative analysis and gives us no numbers.
> ?????5.2) The delta,epsilon values in the M2 panel are the rotation angles of M2 around the axes of its reference system, in arcsecs; they have nothing to do with the pointing offsets in arcsecs on the focal plane
> ?????5.3) Changing the initial position of M2, the ONECAL table for coma shall be updated
> ?????5.4) Changing the initial position of M2, the pointing model shall be updated
> 
> ?????It is much work. I would suggest you to do all of this, only if you are definitely sure that the problem is solved realigning the M2. Maybe 5.1 can help to decide.
> 
> ?????Generally speaking, I cannot verify your assumptions; anyway maybe I can help you further to repeat analysis done during commissioning.
> 
> ??04/02/12 22:46:20 ????vst
> ?????I'd like to add that the bad observations with PSFs degraded in the corners were done in any combination of open and closed loop wave front sensing and auto guiding. The pointing model was very bad (40 arcsecs) in any position of the sky.
> 
> ?????Sure - the telescope was misaligned and the M2 tilt should be measured with the IA (SH sensor) over the full field of view. There is no established procedure (like for UTs). 
> 
> ?????I'm appologizing for the fast hack of the M2 configuration, but with the M2 error 10 days ago and the pointing offset and the tilt of the focal plane, I have had a very good indication in which direction to move and no alternative on the short term either. Still I don't know what has changed physically.
> 
> ?????Mind that the parameters are not archived. Thomas Szeifert
> ??04/03/12 03:28:50 ????vst
> ?????For the record:
> 
> ?????Tonight Thomas made a few checks on the telescope, and then we started an observation with the original M2 tilts. One could immediately appreciate the pointing offset, and we got 15-20% IQ variatino. When correcting the M2 parameters to the tilt values found 2 days ago, the pointing got accurate and IQ variation decreased below 10%.
> 
> ?????Steffen
> ??04/09/12 18:37:02 ????tszeifer
> ?????VST Image quality problems since about March 22, 2012
> ?????-----------------------------------------------------
> 
> ?????We have received reports about strong image degradation at the VST with
> ?????OMEGACAM (PPRS 44520 issued on March 26). The FWHM degrade toward one or
> ?????two corners. 	see OMEGACAM_IMG_OBS091_0062.psfanisotropy.png
> 
> ?????There was as well a degradation of the pointing model at the same time,
> ?????such that I have started to ivestigate based on the working hypotesis
> ?????that one of the two mirrors may be tilted. 
> 
> ?????Pointing offsets:
> ?????-----------------
> 
> ?????	to center the AG on the patch of the SH sensor I have to send
> ?????	either an AG offset (see below) or an M2 tiltpos around
> ?????	the coma free point:
> 
> ?????					AG offset	M2 tiltpos
> ?????	at alt 56deg az 132deg rot 42: ?-29,2.1		-40, 50arcsec
> ?????	???	60deg 	28 ?	138	14,18.4	-10, 50
> ?????		44deg	85deg	74deg	-19,14		-25, 40	
> 
> 
> ?????First correction of M2 in a rush 
> ?????--------------------------------
> ?????	(all images were badly distorted until then)
> ?????	OMEGACAM_IMG_OBS091_0062.psfanisotropy.png
> 
> ?????	I have then corrected a tiltpos at the M2 configuration panel
> ?????	of -25 and 47 arcsecs:
> 
> ?????	??????old value:	new value:
> ?????	X ?????4.350		4.350
> ?????	Y ?????0.5342		0.5342		
> ?????	Z ?????0.700		0.700
> ?????	delta ?214.56		189.56
> ?????	eps ???-369.90		-322.90		
> 
> ?????	This is an absolute rotation of M2 (not around the coma free point)
> ?????	but I presume that the image analyzes would correct the coma
> ?????	introduced by this change (small angle).'
> 
> 
> ?????Pointing models:
> ?????----------------
> 
> ?????tszeifer at pc015434$ more 2011-07-30_VSTv_CA_2-model.dat 
> ?????VLT VSTv CA pointing error file
> ?????T ??48 ??1.2194 ??43.019 ?-0.0479
> ???????IA ??????+247.0246 ????2.47123
> ???????IE ??????+338.4534 ???14.21910
> ???????CA ???????-43.0515 ????4.06020
> ???????AN ????????+6.3089 ????0.24021
> ???????AW ???????+40.7186 ????0.20165
> ???????NPAE ??????+0.4503 ????3.53862
> ???????TF ???????+35.8879 ????2.60760
> ???????ECES ?????+18.7656 ???13.47056
> ???????ACES ??????-1.3801 ????0.43242
> ???????TX ????????-2.9534 ????3.75066
> 
> ?????The following pointing model was taken after the reference pixel was
> ?????changed to the center of rotation (which is far off the SH patch which
> ?????is the usual reference).
> 
> ?????tszeifer at pc015434$ more 2012-04-05_UTv_CA_3-model.dat ?
> ?????VLT UTv CA pointing error file
> ?????T ??40 ??1.8934 ??42.002 ?-0.0484
> ??????=IE ??????+350.8897
> ??????=IA ??????+251.4713
> ??????=CA ???????-77.7675
> ??????=AN ????????+8.0035
> ??????=AW ???????+41.9898
> ??????=NPAE ??????+1.1769
> ??????=TX ????????+3.2583
> ??????=TF ???????+39.4159
> ??????=ACES ??????+0.6101
> 
> ?????IE index error in elevation	(+12 arcsecs)
> ?????IA index error in azimuth	(+4 arcsec)
> ?????CA nonperpendicularity of elevation and pointing axes	(-34 arcsecs!)
> 
> 
> ?????reference pixels:
> ?????-----------------
> ?????	on AG TCCD of VST:
> 
> ?????	center of SH sensor:	196, 178
> ?????	center of rotation:	252, 181
> 
> ?????	?
> ?????measurement of the off-axes aberrations with the VST SH sensor:
> ?????---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ??????- the field dependent astigmatism correction was enabled
> ??????- I have switched off the M1 M2 corrections
> ??????- I did combined offsets (offsets TCS main are not considered by the
> ????????probe absolute position setup)
> ??????- 3 measurements averaged to one value
> 
> ?????The mirrors were corrected before, but the setup of the measurements took
> ?????a while and I was appearently off the best M1,M2 position when I started
> ?????the sequence:
> 
> ????????		?f	??coma		astigm		absrot
> ?????		?----	??----------	---------
> ?????+2400" North	?1263	??501 -109deg	297 ??86deg	-172deg
> ?????0 ?????		?449	??467 ??15deg	280 ?112deg	
> ?????-2400" South	?1367	??726 ??48deg	197 ?120deg	-166deg
> ?????+2400" East	?1633	??571 ?-22deg	191 ?142deg	-163deg
> ?????-2400" West	?1371	??385 ?126deg	167 -153deg	-156deg
> ?????0 ?????		?564	??330 ??17deg ?226 ?104deg	-154deg
> 
> ?????mean astigmatism corrected:
> ?????---------------------------
> ?????(I would need some time to think if the following calculation makes sense.)
> 
> ?????		original	corrected central value	focus offset
> ?????	Z5 (2cos) Z6 (2sin)	Z5 (cos) Z6 sin	
> ?????+2400N	?42 	-294		242	-144		756
> ?????-2400S	-98 ???-171		102	?-21		860
> ?????+2400E	?46	-185		246	?-35		1127
> ?????-2400W	?98	135		298	??98		865
> ?????0	-201	-195		-1	?-45		-57
> ?????0	-200	-106	?????????0	??44		58
> 
> ?????	-> the two values in the center of the field of view indicate
> ?????	about a cos/sin(2alpha) term of -200, 	-150
> 
> 
> 
> ?????Focus (defocus) sequences:
> ?????--------------------------
> 
> ?????	March 31/April 1:
> 
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0001	old config	0deg rotator
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0003	old config	about += 50 deg rotation
> 
> 
> ?????	April 3/4:
> ?????	
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0001	new config	126deg rotator
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0002	new config	-139deg (no ao)
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0003	new config	139deg (after ao)
> 
> ?????	donuts:
> ?????	-------
> 
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0004	new config	-125deg rotator
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0005	new config	150deg (no ao)
> ?????	OMEGACAM*OBS_0006	new config	156deg (after ao)
> ?????	
> ?????	
> 
> ?????	April 4/5:
> 
> ?????	new configuration (but with some decenter of M2 according to
> ?????	the tiltpos of -25, 47 converted to M2 motion around the coma
> ?????	free point.
> 
> ?????	Two files with 0 and 90 rotation on sky.	
> 
> ?????	
> ?????comments received from Pietro Schippani:
> 
> ?????Dear Thomas / Steffen / all,
> 
> ?????thanks a lot.
> 
> ?????Thus, apparently the night of leg#3 error something has happened. Maybe something had already happened (the earthquake of 19/3?) and we could see the effects only after the next M2 INIT.
> ?????I think we should still check the last images immediately before and the first immediately after the leg error. This should confirm that the problems started after the leg#3 error and new INIT of the hexapod.
> 
> ?????Your results seems to be consistent, because a change in CA term should mean a left-right displacement, which should be produced by a tilt of M2 around Y-axis (eps).
> 
> ?????The average tilt you are applying to move the star closer to the previous position is indeed larger around Y:
> ?????delta=-25, eps=47
> 
> ?????I also looked at your astigmatism measures. I attach a Matlab script with some self-explaining comments:
> ?????- I added the field astigmatism (because in 1st version of my report I missed to write their subtraction should have been disabled)
> ?????- I removed the rather large astigmatism measured in the center of the field (average of 2 measures)
> ?????- I fit the results to M2 TILTPOS angles
> 
> ?????The results of the fit are delta=-29, eps=12, but I would not trust them ?(I am not 100% sure about the signs, about the positions in which the SH was, the starting wavefront error was significant, and there is measurement noise).
> 
> ?????If you are reasonably satisfied with the new M2 position that you have found experimentally, maybe the quickest way is that you start from there, try to improve it slightly if possible (I would use the procedure described in my document, taking also images with the camera for a visual cross-check), and then you build a new pointing model and verify if the ONECAL table for coma is still as good as it was before (I would say the 1st measure of coma after ONECAL should never be much larger than 1000nm).
> 
> ?????Indeed, I would benefit from this problem to remove the TILTPOS movement in the ONECAL (see warning no.4, last section of my document). Filling with all zeros the table in the db (see warning no.4) , that movement will end immediately, saving a (little) time, and the interpretation of M2 position after ONECAL will be easier.
> 
> ?????Cheers,
> ?????Pietro
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ?????Comments from Steffen Mieske:
> 
> ?????Hi,
> 
> ?????so I checked the images taken directly before and after the failure. Last image before the failure was taken in the night before.
> 
> ?????last image before M2 failure:
> ?????OMEGA.2012-03-21T09:11:18.177.fits and images before: 40-50 pixel pointing error
> 
> ?????first image after M2 failure:
> ?????OMEGA.2012-03-22T01:37:50.229.fits and images after: ~220-230 pixel pointing error
> 
> ?????This narrows down the event more, I guess there is not much doubt that it must have been the M2 failure.
> 
> ?????Best regards,
> ?????Steffen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ?????CONCLUSION:
> 
> ?????The problem was traced down to a mechanical change of the M2 position either:
> 
> ???????- the problem occured during the failure of M2 in PPRS 44431 on March 21/22
> 
> ??????- or the problem was detected after the init fiollowing the M2 failure on March 21/22
> 
> ????????-> which could have been originated by an earthqquake (reported by various people a few days before the image degradation).
> 
> 
> ?????It is very alarming! There is no recovery procedure for this case! (You need some kind of a standby LAN Chile ticket for telescope scientists or opticians in case of >~xx m/s**2 earthquake if this is true).
> 
> ?????Pending action:
> 
> ??????- new pointing model (with M2 at new position PPRS 44652 but for the reference pixel set to center of rotatioon - to be correct for OMEGACAM and not the SH sensor).
> ??04/10/12 13:38:05 ????tszeifer
> ?????The earthquake was only 3cm/s**2 (classified no risk):
> 
> ?????http://odyssey5.pl.eso.org/paranal/engineering/earthquake/2012-03-19-21-52-22.htm
> ??04/22/12 14:01:22 ????sguisard
> ?????Status Changed: On Hold 
> ?????Modified By: sguisard 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-04-22 14:01:22 
> ?????Status Changed: On Hold 
> ?????Modified By: sguisard 
> ?????Modified Date: 2012-04-22 14:01:22 
> ??05/12/12 15:42:46 ????vst
> ?????We did a pointing model with the old and new M2 configuration paramters:
> 
> ?????old M2 position:
> 
> ?????tszeifer at pc015434$ more 2012-04-05_UTv_CA_3-model.dat ?
> ?????VLT UTv CA pointing error file
> ?????T ??40 ??1.8934 ??42.002 ?-0.0484
> ??????=IE ??????+350.8897
> ??????=IA ??????+251.4713
> ??????=CA ???????-77.7675
> ??????=AN ????????+8.0035
> ??????=AW ???????+41.9898
> ??????=NPAE ??????+1.1769
> ??????=TX ????????+3.2583
> ??????=TF ???????+39.4159
> ??????=ACES ??????+0.6101
> 
> ?????new M2 position:
> 
> ?????Pointing model on 40 stars, the result is:
> 
> ????????????coeff ??????change ????value ???sigma
> 
> ???????1 ????IA ????????+0.000 ??+262.67 ???5.463
> ???????2 ????IE ????????+0.000 ??+363.87 ???1.104
> ???????3 ????CA ????????-0.000 ???-50.87 ??10.956
> ???????4 ????AN ????????-0.000 ????+8.14 ???0.375
> ???????5 ????AW ????????-0.000 ???+43.27 ???0.304
> ???????6 ????NPAE ??????+0.000 ???+21.43 ???9.892
> ???????7 ????TF ????????+0.000 ???+30.08 ???8.071
> ???????8 ????TX ????????-0.000 ????+9.79 ???5.039
> ???????9 ????ACES ??????-0.000 ????-1.25 ???0.921
> 
> ?????Sky RMS = ??1.51
> ?????Popn SD = ??1.79
> 
> 
> ?????The pointing model was needed due to the modified M2 zero points as already discussed above:
> 
> ?????	??????old value:	new value:
> ?????	X ?????4.350		4.350
> ?????	Y ?????0.5342		0.5342		
> ?????	Z ?????0.700		0.700
> ?????	delta ?214.56		189.56
> ?????	eps ???-369.90		-322.90		
> ??04/03/14 12:49:07 ????phaguena
> ?????Assignee changed: tszeifer 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: phaguena 
> ?????Modified Date: 2014-04-03 12:49:07 
> ?????Assignee changed: tszeifer 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Science Operations 
> ?????Modified By: phaguena 
> ?????Modified Date: 2014-04-03 12:49:07 
> ??05/12/14 00:15:07 ????tszeifer
> ?????!!!MASTER TICKET!!!
> ??08/11/14 22:05:11 ????tszeifer
> ?????Status Changed: Assigned 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 2014-08-11 22:05:11 
> ?????Status Changed: Assigned 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 2014-08-11 22:05:11 
> ??05/05/15 21:15:14 ????tszeifer
> ?????M2 hexapod is more stable now. M2 tilt is corrected by the OMEGACAM IA. I put this on hold for the time being. In theory it should not happen anymore.
> 
> ?????Status Changed: On Hold 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 2015-05-05 21:15:13 
> ?????Status Changed: On Hold 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 2015-05-05 21:15:13 
> ??08/01/15 20:29:30 ????tszeifer
> ?????From my point of view it can be closed now, TSz
> 
> ?????Assignee changed: rhuerta 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Electronic 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 08/01/15 20:29:30 
> ?????Assignee changed: rhuerta 
> ?????Assigned to Group Changed: Electronic 
> ?????Modified By: tszeifer 
> ?????Modified Date: 08/01/15 20:29:30 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 139763 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.astro-wise.org/pipermail/comm2011/attachments/20150805/af09b865/attachment-0001.bin>