[KIDS] visual inspection: fixed-format comments

[Gijs Verdoes Kleijn]

Dear John, Lino et al.,

Thanks for your comments proposal lists. I have compiled a proposed 
final list out of them. See top of:
http://wiki.astro-wise.org/projects:kids:qualitycontrol:kids_qc_comments_glossary

Let's finalize it at the telecon today. After which  John can add it to 
QWise interface.

Best wishes, Gijs



> Dear Jelte,
>
> we partially completed the exercise on coadds. Attached you will find a
> sample of the comments that are the starting point to create an homogeneous
> list of comments. They are quite inhomogeneous and a first order
> distillation is the following:
>
>
> ST: satellite track
> TBars vignetting: vignetting due to Tbars on big horizontal gaps
> reflections: additional light with sharp edges
> straylight: additional diffused light
> inhomogeneous background: structures in background (may be due to residual
> fringing, residual stars in flatfield)
> pattern in background: mosaic structure still visible
> weight map too noisy: some ccd shows excess noise
> trends in FWHM: trends visible in FWHM vs RA and/or DEC
> FF not properly done: (i.e. still visible rhomboidal structure in u band
> images)
> MB not properly done (i.e. still visible bias structure in ccd68)
>
> We propose to put in the coadd qualitywise page the masterflat mosaic png
> (in order to identify easily a certain class of problems in the master
> flat). Furthermore as you see it would be useful to add comment on the
> weight map and on the FWHM behavior.  The average FHWM for each exposure
> that contribute to a mosaic would be very useful too.
> Now, how do we want to proceed? Do we put in the db the comments we have
> collected or we wait for John to finish the tool to add fixed comments?
>
> ciao
>
> Lino


Op 16-4-2012 16:04, J.P. Mc Farland schreef:
> Hi Jelte,
>
> Here are my fixed comments distilled from those on the page below:
>
> star trails
> electronic noise
> excessive pixel noise
> straylight
> reflections
> satellite tracks
> fringe residuals
> weightmap unusual
> stars in calibration frame
> extended background artifacts
> low-level background variation
> systematic background variation
>
> Optionally, these can be extended or supplemented by other comments in the interface.  The final form has not yet been reached.  At the moment, there are two comment fields: free and fixed, and both give a separate comment.  I can easily add a switch to combine them into one comment if that is desirable.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> -=John
>
> On Apr 4, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Gijs Verdoes Kleijn wrote:
>
>> http://wiki.astro-wise.org/projects:kids:qualitycontrol:kids_qc_comments_glossary

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|dr Gijs Verdoes Kleijn         |   astronomer                     |
|e-mail: verdoes at astro.rug.nl   |   OmegaCEN / Kapteyn Institute / |
|www: www.astro.rug.nl/~verdoes |   Target                         |
|tel: +31-50-3638326            |   University of Groningen        |
|mobile: +31-654658050          |   postal address:                |
|                               |   Kapteyn Astronomical Institute |
|                               |   Postbus 800, 9700 AV, Groningen|
|                               |   The Netherlands                |
--------------------------------------------------------------------