[KIDS] KIDSCAT mag lim implementation
Gijs Verdoes Kleijn
verdoes at astro.rug.nl
Thu Nov 22 06:44:34 CET 2012
Dear Francesco et al,
Many thanks for the input Francesco. I bring this conversation now into
the mailinglist space to ease following the discussion.
On 11/21/2012 09:42 AM, Francesco La Barbera wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I just finished to implement the limiting mag computation for KIDS
> catalogs within
> KIDSCAT. I'm including Gijs and Jelte in cc here so that they are
> real-time updated, and
> can contribute to the discussion/provide comments of course.
>
> I ran the procedure for all 52 fields. The procedure produces a single
> plot, with SNR as a function
> of 2'' diameter mag. One example is attached here, for the
> field KIDS_185.0_1.5.r.
> Black points are all good (flag==0) objects in the field. In red you
> can see the median trend, while
> the blue curve is the analytic fit
> p_1*flux/(p_2*flux+p_3)
> where p_1, p_2, and p_3 are free fitting parameters.
Looks good! Could you share the script you are using? Then Hugo and I
will make a python version of it as part of the QC script for sourcelists.
The series of 4 (5?) curves are due to discrete steps in integration
times due to the dither pattern, right?
The displacement in magnitude seem in rough agreement with that idea:
>>> -2.5*math.log10(4/5.)
0.24227503252014099
>>> -2.5*math.log10(3/5.)
0.55462187404089092
>>> -2.5*math.log10(1/5.)
1.7474250108400469
>>> -2.5*math.log10(2/5.)
0.99485002168009395
>
> The analytic fit is used to compute the typical mag corresponding to
> SNR_LIMIT=5 (see dashed and
> solid black lines in the plot). This is our limiting mag.
> The procedure also computes the same kind of limit but for different
> SNR_LIMIT(i.e. 10 and 15). These
> values are stored in an ascii file (MLIM.dat), into the subdirectory
> OUTPUT_RES.
Good. Please store the analytic fit parameters as well. Those will come
in handy.
>
> I made some tests according to what we mentioned some time ago:
> 1) I can confirm that computing SNR from either FLUXERR or MAGERR
> doesn't make any difference at all (just a sanity check);
Good.
> 2) using different detection tresholds does not change significantly
> the mag lim estimates; the second attached plot
> shows the effect of decreasing DETECT_TRESH from 2.5 to 2.0 for the
> same fit as in the example. The mag lim goes
> from 24.77 to 24.78!!
Good to know MAG_APER at 2" diameter is very insensitive to this change
in DETECT_THRESH. That might be different for e..g, MAG_ISO. For now I
think it is enough to restrict the lim. mag. analysis to MAG_APER with
2". For those we have predictions we can compare to (in KiDS proposal).
KiDS team meeting is a good opportunity if/how we need to extend the
lim. mag. analysis.
Best wishes, Gijs
>
> Pls, lemme know whatever comment/suggestion you have. Also, do we
> want/need compute other limiting mags
> (e.g. using MAGAUTO/different apertures)???
>
> Cheers,
> Francesco
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|dr Gijs Verdoes Kleijn | astronomer |
|e-mail:verdoes at astro.rug.nl | OmegaCEN / Kapteyn Institute / |
|www:www.astro.rug.nl/~verdoes | Target |
|tel: +31-50-3638326 | University of Groningen |
|mobile: +31-654658050 | postal address: |
| | Kapteyn Astronomical Institute |
| | Postbus 800, 9700 AV, Groningen|
| | The Netherlands |
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: MLIM.ps
Type: application/postscript
Size: 413320 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listman.astro-wise.org/pipermail/kids/attachments/20121122/b3e62c99/attachment-0002.ps
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: MLIM_KIDS_185.0_1.5.r_detect_tresh_2sigma.ps
Type: application/postscript
Size: 528090 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listman.astro-wise.org/pipermail/kids/attachments/20121122/b3e62c99/attachment-0003.ps
More information about the KiDS
mailing list